Dipesh, Supratik Sen, Sandeep Singh, Manindra Bhushan, Raj Pal Singh, Abhay Kumar Singh, Mahipal, Munish Gairola
{"title":"断层治疗中动态下颌宽度调整对全脑放疗海马保留及疗效的影响。","authors":"Dipesh, Supratik Sen, Sandeep Singh, Manindra Bhushan, Raj Pal Singh, Abhay Kumar Singh, Mahipal, Munish Gairola","doi":"10.1007/s12194-025-00951-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of dynamic jaw width adjustment in tomotherapy on hippocampal sparing, target dose conformity, and treatment efficiency in hippocampal-avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT), in accordance with RTOG 0933 guidelines. A retrospective study of 60 patients treated with HA-WBRT was conducted. CT-MRI fusion facilitated accurate hippocampal delineation. Treatment plans were created using Accuray Precision TPS and delivered on the Radixact Tomotherapy system with three jaw widths (1 cm, 2.5 cm, and 5 cm), fixed pitch (0.215), and modulation factor (3.0). The prescription dose was 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Evaluation metrics included PTV coverage (D98%, V95%, D2%, Dmax), homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), hippocampal and lens doses, and beam-on time (BOT). Plan verification was performed with ArcCHECK using 3%/3 mm and 3%/2 mm gamma criteria. The 1 cm jaw achieved the best PTV coverage (D98% = 29.22 Gy, V95% = 98.71%), with HI = 0.09, CI = 0.99, and superior hippocampal sparing (Dmax = 14.91 Gy, Dmin = 7.57 Gy), but had the longest BOT (1165 s). Wider jaws (2.5 cm, 5 cm) reduced BOT (480 s, 280 s) but slightly compromised conformity and increased OAR doses, all within limits. Jaw width selection in Helical Tomotherapy influences dose distribution characteristics and treatment delivery efficiency in hippocampus-sparing WBRT. A 1 cm jaw width provides superior dosimetric conformity and enhanced hippocampal sparing, albeit at the cost of increased BOT. In contrast, wider jaw widths (2.5 cm and 5 cm) improve delivery efficiency but result in modest reductions in dose precision and organ-at-risk sparing. Therefore, jaw width selection should be carefully individualized based on clinical objectives, balancing the trade-off between organ preservation and treatment efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":46252,"journal":{"name":"Radiological Physics and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of dynamic jaw width adjustment in tomotherapy on hippocampus sparing and treatment efficiency in whole-brain radiotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Dipesh, Supratik Sen, Sandeep Singh, Manindra Bhushan, Raj Pal Singh, Abhay Kumar Singh, Mahipal, Munish Gairola\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12194-025-00951-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of dynamic jaw width adjustment in tomotherapy on hippocampal sparing, target dose conformity, and treatment efficiency in hippocampal-avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT), in accordance with RTOG 0933 guidelines. A retrospective study of 60 patients treated with HA-WBRT was conducted. CT-MRI fusion facilitated accurate hippocampal delineation. Treatment plans were created using Accuray Precision TPS and delivered on the Radixact Tomotherapy system with three jaw widths (1 cm, 2.5 cm, and 5 cm), fixed pitch (0.215), and modulation factor (3.0). The prescription dose was 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Evaluation metrics included PTV coverage (D98%, V95%, D2%, Dmax), homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), hippocampal and lens doses, and beam-on time (BOT). Plan verification was performed with ArcCHECK using 3%/3 mm and 3%/2 mm gamma criteria. The 1 cm jaw achieved the best PTV coverage (D98% = 29.22 Gy, V95% = 98.71%), with HI = 0.09, CI = 0.99, and superior hippocampal sparing (Dmax = 14.91 Gy, Dmin = 7.57 Gy), but had the longest BOT (1165 s). Wider jaws (2.5 cm, 5 cm) reduced BOT (480 s, 280 s) but slightly compromised conformity and increased OAR doses, all within limits. Jaw width selection in Helical Tomotherapy influences dose distribution characteristics and treatment delivery efficiency in hippocampus-sparing WBRT. A 1 cm jaw width provides superior dosimetric conformity and enhanced hippocampal sparing, albeit at the cost of increased BOT. In contrast, wider jaw widths (2.5 cm and 5 cm) improve delivery efficiency but result in modest reductions in dose precision and organ-at-risk sparing. Therefore, jaw width selection should be carefully individualized based on clinical objectives, balancing the trade-off between organ preservation and treatment efficiency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiological Physics and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiological Physics and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-025-00951-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiological Physics and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-025-00951-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of dynamic jaw width adjustment in tomotherapy on hippocampus sparing and treatment efficiency in whole-brain radiotherapy.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of dynamic jaw width adjustment in tomotherapy on hippocampal sparing, target dose conformity, and treatment efficiency in hippocampal-avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT), in accordance with RTOG 0933 guidelines. A retrospective study of 60 patients treated with HA-WBRT was conducted. CT-MRI fusion facilitated accurate hippocampal delineation. Treatment plans were created using Accuray Precision TPS and delivered on the Radixact Tomotherapy system with three jaw widths (1 cm, 2.5 cm, and 5 cm), fixed pitch (0.215), and modulation factor (3.0). The prescription dose was 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Evaluation metrics included PTV coverage (D98%, V95%, D2%, Dmax), homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), hippocampal and lens doses, and beam-on time (BOT). Plan verification was performed with ArcCHECK using 3%/3 mm and 3%/2 mm gamma criteria. The 1 cm jaw achieved the best PTV coverage (D98% = 29.22 Gy, V95% = 98.71%), with HI = 0.09, CI = 0.99, and superior hippocampal sparing (Dmax = 14.91 Gy, Dmin = 7.57 Gy), but had the longest BOT (1165 s). Wider jaws (2.5 cm, 5 cm) reduced BOT (480 s, 280 s) but slightly compromised conformity and increased OAR doses, all within limits. Jaw width selection in Helical Tomotherapy influences dose distribution characteristics and treatment delivery efficiency in hippocampus-sparing WBRT. A 1 cm jaw width provides superior dosimetric conformity and enhanced hippocampal sparing, albeit at the cost of increased BOT. In contrast, wider jaw widths (2.5 cm and 5 cm) improve delivery efficiency but result in modest reductions in dose precision and organ-at-risk sparing. Therefore, jaw width selection should be carefully individualized based on clinical objectives, balancing the trade-off between organ preservation and treatment efficiency.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of the journal Radiological Physics and Technology is to provide a forum for sharing new knowledge related to research and development in radiological science and technology, including medical physics and radiological technology in diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy among many other radiological disciplines, as well as to contribute to progress and improvement in medical practice and patient health care.