Delaney B McKone, Karolyn S Duprey, Hayley M Hall, Abigail Leonhard, Aric Schadler, Kristina W Naseman
{"title":"2型糖尿病患者加用替西帕肽与西马鲁肽或杜拉鲁肽后胰岛素用量的比较。","authors":"Delaney B McKone, Karolyn S Duprey, Hayley M Hall, Abigail Leonhard, Aric Schadler, Kristina W Naseman","doi":"10.2337/ds24-0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate insulin dose requirements after the addition of the dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide/glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist tirzepatide compared with the GLP-1 receptor agonists injectable semaglutide and dulaglutide in people with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study using chart review of electronic health records to identify patients from a single academic medical center with type 2 diabetes who were initiated on tirzepatide, injectable semaglutide, or dulaglutide from 1 July 2021 to 31 May 2023 while on concomitant insulin therapy (basal with or without bolus or premixed insulin).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 135 patients were included in the study. The median percentage change in insulin requirement was 0% at 4-6 weeks (<i>P</i> = 0.286), -16.67% at 3 months (<i>P</i> <0.001), -51.03% at 6 months (<i>P</i> <0.001), and -58.33% at 12 months (<i>P</i> = 0.013) for the tirzepatide group (<i>n</i> = 45) and 0% at 4-6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months and -12.50% at 12 months in the combined dulaglutide and semaglutide group (<i>n</i> = 90). Mean change in weight at 6 months was -8.5813 kg in the tirzepatide group and -3.4111 kg in the dulaglutide and semaglutide group (<i>P</i> <0.001). The most commonly reported adverse events in the tirzepatide group were decreased appetite, nausea, and vomiting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with type 2 diabetes who were also on insulin, tirzepatide led to significantly lower insulin requirements after 3, 6, and 12 months of use compared with dulaglutide and semaglutide. Tirzepatide also led to significantly more weight loss compared with dulaglutide and semaglutide and yielded a larger decrease in A1C overall without increasing side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":39737,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Spectrum","volume":"38 3","pages":"266-273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12357194/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Insulin Dosage After the Addition of Tirzepatide Compared With Semaglutide or Dulaglutide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Delaney B McKone, Karolyn S Duprey, Hayley M Hall, Abigail Leonhard, Aric Schadler, Kristina W Naseman\",\"doi\":\"10.2337/ds24-0035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate insulin dose requirements after the addition of the dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide/glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist tirzepatide compared with the GLP-1 receptor agonists injectable semaglutide and dulaglutide in people with type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study using chart review of electronic health records to identify patients from a single academic medical center with type 2 diabetes who were initiated on tirzepatide, injectable semaglutide, or dulaglutide from 1 July 2021 to 31 May 2023 while on concomitant insulin therapy (basal with or without bolus or premixed insulin).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 135 patients were included in the study. The median percentage change in insulin requirement was 0% at 4-6 weeks (<i>P</i> = 0.286), -16.67% at 3 months (<i>P</i> <0.001), -51.03% at 6 months (<i>P</i> <0.001), and -58.33% at 12 months (<i>P</i> = 0.013) for the tirzepatide group (<i>n</i> = 45) and 0% at 4-6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months and -12.50% at 12 months in the combined dulaglutide and semaglutide group (<i>n</i> = 90). Mean change in weight at 6 months was -8.5813 kg in the tirzepatide group and -3.4111 kg in the dulaglutide and semaglutide group (<i>P</i> <0.001). The most commonly reported adverse events in the tirzepatide group were decreased appetite, nausea, and vomiting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with type 2 diabetes who were also on insulin, tirzepatide led to significantly lower insulin requirements after 3, 6, and 12 months of use compared with dulaglutide and semaglutide. Tirzepatide also led to significantly more weight loss compared with dulaglutide and semaglutide and yielded a larger decrease in A1C overall without increasing side effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes Spectrum\",\"volume\":\"38 3\",\"pages\":\"266-273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12357194/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes Spectrum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2337/ds24-0035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/ds24-0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of Insulin Dosage After the Addition of Tirzepatide Compared With Semaglutide or Dulaglutide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate insulin dose requirements after the addition of the dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide/glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist tirzepatide compared with the GLP-1 receptor agonists injectable semaglutide and dulaglutide in people with type 2 diabetes.
Research design and methods: This was a retrospective cohort study using chart review of electronic health records to identify patients from a single academic medical center with type 2 diabetes who were initiated on tirzepatide, injectable semaglutide, or dulaglutide from 1 July 2021 to 31 May 2023 while on concomitant insulin therapy (basal with or without bolus or premixed insulin).
Results: A total of 135 patients were included in the study. The median percentage change in insulin requirement was 0% at 4-6 weeks (P = 0.286), -16.67% at 3 months (P <0.001), -51.03% at 6 months (P <0.001), and -58.33% at 12 months (P = 0.013) for the tirzepatide group (n = 45) and 0% at 4-6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months and -12.50% at 12 months in the combined dulaglutide and semaglutide group (n = 90). Mean change in weight at 6 months was -8.5813 kg in the tirzepatide group and -3.4111 kg in the dulaglutide and semaglutide group (P <0.001). The most commonly reported adverse events in the tirzepatide group were decreased appetite, nausea, and vomiting.
Conclusion: In patients with type 2 diabetes who were also on insulin, tirzepatide led to significantly lower insulin requirements after 3, 6, and 12 months of use compared with dulaglutide and semaglutide. Tirzepatide also led to significantly more weight loss compared with dulaglutide and semaglutide and yielded a larger decrease in A1C overall without increasing side effects.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Diabetes Spectrum: From Research to Practice is to assist health care professionals in the development of strategies to individualize treatment and diabetes self-management education for improved quality of life and diabetes control. These goals are achieved by presenting review as well as original, peer-reviewed articles on topics in clinical diabetes management, professional and patient education, nutrition, behavioral science and counseling, educational program development, and advocacy. In each issue, the FROM RESEARCH TO PRACTICE section explores, in depth, a diabetes care topic and provides practical application of current research findings.