评估肌腱转移在不可修复的肩袖撕裂:临床结果和失败率的系统回顾。

IF 1.1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Marc Daniel Bouchard, Nikhil Aman Patel, Carl Keogh, Danielle Dagher, Brooke Mackinnon, Sophia Argyropoulos, David Slawaska-Eng, Moin Khan, Bashar Alolabi
{"title":"评估肌腱转移在不可修复的肩袖撕裂:临床结果和失败率的系统回顾。","authors":"Marc Daniel Bouchard, Nikhil Aman Patel, Carl Keogh, Danielle Dagher, Brooke Mackinnon, Sophia Argyropoulos, David Slawaska-Eng, Moin Khan, Bashar Alolabi","doi":"10.1177/17585732251368884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCTs) pose a clinical challenge, particularly in younger patients. Tendon transfers (TTs) have emerged as a joint-preserving surgical option. However, the clinical outcomes, failure rates, and complication profiles associated with different TTs remain incompletely defined. This systematic review evaluates outcomes across various TT techniques used to manage IRCTs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Emcare databases was conducted for studies involving adults with diagnosed IRCTs reporting patient-reported outcomes and failure rates following TT. Non-English studies, conference abstracts, case reports, and studies with <12 months follow-up were excluded. Descriptive summaries and pooled analyses were performed by tendon type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty studies (980 patients, 994 shoulders) were included. The mean patient age was 58.9 years, with a mean follow-up of 44.7 months. Latissimus dorsi (LD) transfers were most commonly reported. All tendon types showed significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes. Teres major transfers exhibited the highest Constant-Murley Score improvement (+40) and greatest pain reduction (VAS-5.6), although based on a single study. Failure rates ranged from 4.2% to 14.1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TTs improve pain and function in IRCTs. LD transfers remain the most widely used. Variability in techniques and outcomes highlights the need for standardized protocols and further high-quality research.</p>","PeriodicalId":36705,"journal":{"name":"Shoulder and Elbow","volume":" ","pages":"17585732251368884"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12354401/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating tendon transfers in irreparable rotator cuff tears: A systematic review of clinical outcomes and failure rates.\",\"authors\":\"Marc Daniel Bouchard, Nikhil Aman Patel, Carl Keogh, Danielle Dagher, Brooke Mackinnon, Sophia Argyropoulos, David Slawaska-Eng, Moin Khan, Bashar Alolabi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17585732251368884\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCTs) pose a clinical challenge, particularly in younger patients. Tendon transfers (TTs) have emerged as a joint-preserving surgical option. However, the clinical outcomes, failure rates, and complication profiles associated with different TTs remain incompletely defined. This systematic review evaluates outcomes across various TT techniques used to manage IRCTs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Emcare databases was conducted for studies involving adults with diagnosed IRCTs reporting patient-reported outcomes and failure rates following TT. Non-English studies, conference abstracts, case reports, and studies with <12 months follow-up were excluded. Descriptive summaries and pooled analyses were performed by tendon type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty studies (980 patients, 994 shoulders) were included. The mean patient age was 58.9 years, with a mean follow-up of 44.7 months. Latissimus dorsi (LD) transfers were most commonly reported. All tendon types showed significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes. Teres major transfers exhibited the highest Constant-Murley Score improvement (+40) and greatest pain reduction (VAS-5.6), although based on a single study. Failure rates ranged from 4.2% to 14.1%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TTs improve pain and function in IRCTs. LD transfers remain the most widely used. Variability in techniques and outcomes highlights the need for standardized protocols and further high-quality research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Shoulder and Elbow\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17585732251368884\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12354401/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Shoulder and Elbow\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732251368884\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shoulder and Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732251368884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不可修复的肩袖撕裂(irct)是一个临床挑战,特别是在年轻患者中。肌腱转移(TTs)已成为一种保留关节的手术选择。然而,临床结果、失败率和与不同TTs相关的并发症仍然不完全确定。本系统综述评估了用于管理irct的各种TT技术的结果。方法:对MEDLINE、Embase和Emcare数据库进行系统检索,研究涉及诊断为irct的成人,报告患者报告的TT后的结果和失败率。非英语研究、会议摘要、病例报告和有结果的研究:纳入了30项研究(980例患者,994例肩部)。患者平均年龄58.9岁,平均随访44.7个月。背阔肌转移是最常见的报道。所有肌腱类型在患者报告的预后方面均有显著改善。尽管基于单一研究,但泰瑞斯大转移表现出最高的Constant-Murley评分改善(+40)和最大的疼痛减轻(VAS-5.6)。失败率从4.2%到14.1%不等。结论:TTs可改善irct患者的疼痛和功能。LD转换仍然是最广泛使用的。技术和结果的可变性突出了标准化方案和进一步高质量研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating tendon transfers in irreparable rotator cuff tears: A systematic review of clinical outcomes and failure rates.

Background: Irreparable rotator cuff tears (IRCTs) pose a clinical challenge, particularly in younger patients. Tendon transfers (TTs) have emerged as a joint-preserving surgical option. However, the clinical outcomes, failure rates, and complication profiles associated with different TTs remain incompletely defined. This systematic review evaluates outcomes across various TT techniques used to manage IRCTs.

Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Emcare databases was conducted for studies involving adults with diagnosed IRCTs reporting patient-reported outcomes and failure rates following TT. Non-English studies, conference abstracts, case reports, and studies with <12 months follow-up were excluded. Descriptive summaries and pooled analyses were performed by tendon type.

Results: Thirty studies (980 patients, 994 shoulders) were included. The mean patient age was 58.9 years, with a mean follow-up of 44.7 months. Latissimus dorsi (LD) transfers were most commonly reported. All tendon types showed significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes. Teres major transfers exhibited the highest Constant-Murley Score improvement (+40) and greatest pain reduction (VAS-5.6), although based on a single study. Failure rates ranged from 4.2% to 14.1%.

Conclusions: TTs improve pain and function in IRCTs. LD transfers remain the most widely used. Variability in techniques and outcomes highlights the need for standardized protocols and further high-quality research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Shoulder and Elbow
Shoulder and Elbow Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信