物种丰富的开花植物豆科的系统发育解决与冲突。

IF 5.7 1区 生物学 Q1 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Rong Zhang, Gregory W Stull, Jian-Jun Jin, Yin-Huan Wang, Ying Guo, Zhi-Yun Yang, Hong-Tao Li, Kai-Lun An, Joseph L M Charboneau, Ryan A Folk, Domingos Cardoso, Luciano P de Queiroz, Anne Bruneau, Pamela S Soltis, Douglas E Soltis, Stephen A Smith, De-Zhu Li, Ting-Shuang Yi
{"title":"物种丰富的开花植物豆科的系统发育解决与冲突。","authors":"Rong Zhang, Gregory W Stull, Jian-Jun Jin, Yin-Huan Wang, Ying Guo, Zhi-Yun Yang, Hong-Tao Li, Kai-Lun An, Joseph L M Charboneau, Ryan A Folk, Domingos Cardoso, Luciano P de Queiroz, Anne Bruneau, Pamela S Soltis, Douglas E Soltis, Stephen A Smith, De-Zhu Li, Ting-Shuang Yi","doi":"10.1093/sysbio/syaf057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Tree of Life is central to evolutionary biology, yet resolving deep, recalcitrant phylogenetic relationships remains challenging due to complex processes such as incomplete lineage sorting (ILS), hybridization, and polyploidization. Although previous phylogenetic studies have advanced our understanding of Leguminosae (Fabaceae), a species-rich and ecologically diverse family, many deep relationships at the tribal and higher levels remain unresolved. Incorporating newly generated genome skimming data for 231 species with previously issued plastid genomic, mitochondrial genomic and transcriptomic data, we reconstructed a phylogeny of the family using whole plastomes, 39 mitochondrial genes, and 1559 low-copy nuclear genes, achieving dense taxonomic sampling across almost all recognized tribes and major unplaced lineages. Our results supported the monophyly of the six subfamilies and 49 recognized tribes, identified ten clades worthy of recognition as new tribes in subfamily Papilionoideae, and clarified many contentious relationships. However, nuclear-nuclear and cytonuclear conflicts persist at multiple nodes among trees inferred from different datasets and analytical methods. We proposed the most probable resolution for 22 contentious nodes by applying nuclear gene-tree quartet analysis with corroboration from support of nuclear Maximum Likelihood (ML) and ASTRAL trees. Our results indicate ILS significantly contributes to observed phylogenetic conflicts, while gene flow represents an additional and previously underappreciated factor that mainly contributes to cytonuclear conflicts, particularly along the branches of the Angylocalyceae + Dipterygeae + Amburaneae (ADA) clade and Wisterieae. These processes likely underlie recalcitrant phylogenetic relationships, such as those within the 50-kb inversion clade of Papilionoideae. Our study uses multiple data partitions and analytical methods to resolve contentious phylogenetic relationships in Leguminosae, resulting in a robust phylogenomic framework to guide further investigations in this economically important and exceptionally diverse family.</p>","PeriodicalId":22120,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phylogenetic Resolution and Conflict in the Species-Rich Flowering Plant Family Leguminosae.\",\"authors\":\"Rong Zhang, Gregory W Stull, Jian-Jun Jin, Yin-Huan Wang, Ying Guo, Zhi-Yun Yang, Hong-Tao Li, Kai-Lun An, Joseph L M Charboneau, Ryan A Folk, Domingos Cardoso, Luciano P de Queiroz, Anne Bruneau, Pamela S Soltis, Douglas E Soltis, Stephen A Smith, De-Zhu Li, Ting-Shuang Yi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/sysbio/syaf057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Tree of Life is central to evolutionary biology, yet resolving deep, recalcitrant phylogenetic relationships remains challenging due to complex processes such as incomplete lineage sorting (ILS), hybridization, and polyploidization. Although previous phylogenetic studies have advanced our understanding of Leguminosae (Fabaceae), a species-rich and ecologically diverse family, many deep relationships at the tribal and higher levels remain unresolved. Incorporating newly generated genome skimming data for 231 species with previously issued plastid genomic, mitochondrial genomic and transcriptomic data, we reconstructed a phylogeny of the family using whole plastomes, 39 mitochondrial genes, and 1559 low-copy nuclear genes, achieving dense taxonomic sampling across almost all recognized tribes and major unplaced lineages. Our results supported the monophyly of the six subfamilies and 49 recognized tribes, identified ten clades worthy of recognition as new tribes in subfamily Papilionoideae, and clarified many contentious relationships. However, nuclear-nuclear and cytonuclear conflicts persist at multiple nodes among trees inferred from different datasets and analytical methods. We proposed the most probable resolution for 22 contentious nodes by applying nuclear gene-tree quartet analysis with corroboration from support of nuclear Maximum Likelihood (ML) and ASTRAL trees. Our results indicate ILS significantly contributes to observed phylogenetic conflicts, while gene flow represents an additional and previously underappreciated factor that mainly contributes to cytonuclear conflicts, particularly along the branches of the Angylocalyceae + Dipterygeae + Amburaneae (ADA) clade and Wisterieae. These processes likely underlie recalcitrant phylogenetic relationships, such as those within the 50-kb inversion clade of Papilionoideae. Our study uses multiple data partitions and analytical methods to resolve contentious phylogenetic relationships in Leguminosae, resulting in a robust phylogenomic framework to guide further investigations in this economically important and exceptionally diverse family.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systematic Biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systematic Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syaf057\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syaf057","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生命之树是进化生物学的核心,但由于复杂的过程,如不完全谱系分类(ILS)、杂交和多倍体化,解决深层的、顽固的系统发育关系仍然具有挑战性。虽然以前的系统发育研究提高了我们对豆科(豆科)这一物种丰富、生态多样的科的认识,但在部落和更高层次上的许多深层关系仍未得到解决。结合新生成的231个物种的基因组略读数据和先前发布的质体基因组、线粒体基因组和转录组数据,我们利用整个质体、39个线粒体基因和1559个低拷贝核基因重建了该家族的系统发育,在几乎所有已知的部落和主要未被发现的谱系中实现了密集的分类抽样。本研究结果支持了6个亚科和49个已确认的部落的单一性,确定了10个值得确认为新部落的分支,并澄清了许多有争议的关系。然而,从不同的数据集和分析方法推断出的树中,核冲突和细胞核冲突在多个节点上持续存在。我们通过核基因树四重奏分析提出了22个争议节点的最可能解决方案,并得到核最大似然树(ML)和ASTRAL树的支持。我们的研究结果表明,ILS显著有助于观察到的系统发育冲突,而基因流动是一个额外的、以前未被重视的因素,主要有助于细胞核冲突,特别是沿着Angylocalyceae + Dipterygeae + Amburaneae (ADA)分支和Wisterieae的分支。这些过程可能是顽固的系统发育关系的基础,例如在凤蝶科的50 kb倒置分支中。我们的研究使用多个数据分区和分析方法来解决豆科植物中有争议的系统发育关系,从而形成一个强大的系统基因组框架,以指导对这个经济上重要且异常多样化的家庭的进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phylogenetic Resolution and Conflict in the Species-Rich Flowering Plant Family Leguminosae.

The Tree of Life is central to evolutionary biology, yet resolving deep, recalcitrant phylogenetic relationships remains challenging due to complex processes such as incomplete lineage sorting (ILS), hybridization, and polyploidization. Although previous phylogenetic studies have advanced our understanding of Leguminosae (Fabaceae), a species-rich and ecologically diverse family, many deep relationships at the tribal and higher levels remain unresolved. Incorporating newly generated genome skimming data for 231 species with previously issued plastid genomic, mitochondrial genomic and transcriptomic data, we reconstructed a phylogeny of the family using whole plastomes, 39 mitochondrial genes, and 1559 low-copy nuclear genes, achieving dense taxonomic sampling across almost all recognized tribes and major unplaced lineages. Our results supported the monophyly of the six subfamilies and 49 recognized tribes, identified ten clades worthy of recognition as new tribes in subfamily Papilionoideae, and clarified many contentious relationships. However, nuclear-nuclear and cytonuclear conflicts persist at multiple nodes among trees inferred from different datasets and analytical methods. We proposed the most probable resolution for 22 contentious nodes by applying nuclear gene-tree quartet analysis with corroboration from support of nuclear Maximum Likelihood (ML) and ASTRAL trees. Our results indicate ILS significantly contributes to observed phylogenetic conflicts, while gene flow represents an additional and previously underappreciated factor that mainly contributes to cytonuclear conflicts, particularly along the branches of the Angylocalyceae + Dipterygeae + Amburaneae (ADA) clade and Wisterieae. These processes likely underlie recalcitrant phylogenetic relationships, such as those within the 50-kb inversion clade of Papilionoideae. Our study uses multiple data partitions and analytical methods to resolve contentious phylogenetic relationships in Leguminosae, resulting in a robust phylogenomic framework to guide further investigations in this economically important and exceptionally diverse family.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Systematic Biology
Systematic Biology 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
70
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Biology is the bimonthly journal of the Society of Systematic Biologists. Papers for the journal are original contributions to the theory, principles, and methods of systematics as well as phylogeny, evolution, morphology, biogeography, paleontology, genetics, and the classification of all living things. A Points of View section offers a forum for discussion, while book reviews and announcements of general interest are also featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信