在轻度至中度体位依赖性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(POSA)患者的日间嗜睡方面,睡姿治疗与气道正压治疗相比的非劣效性:一项多中心随机交叉试验的研究方案。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2025-08-18 DOI:10.1186/s13063-025-09007-1
Nina Timmesfeld, Anja Neumann, Frederik Valbert, Jürgen Wasem, Alexandra Spillner, Christoph Schöbel
{"title":"在轻度至中度体位依赖性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(POSA)患者的日间嗜睡方面,睡姿治疗与气道正压治疗相比的非劣效性:一项多中心随机交叉试验的研究方案。","authors":"Nina Timmesfeld, Anja Neumann, Frederik Valbert, Jürgen Wasem, Alexandra Spillner, Christoph Schöbel","doi":"10.1186/s13063-025-09007-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>First-line therapy for patients with clinically relevant obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is positive airway pressure therapy (PAP). At least one half of patients with mild to moderate OSA (apnoea-hypopnoea-index (AHI) 5-30/h) have positional OSA (POSA), where apnoea occurs mostly in supine sleep. These patients might benefit from sleep-position therapy (SPT) which should reduce sleeping time spent in a supine position. Until now, it is unclear whether SPT is non-inferior to PAP therapy for symptom relief in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a multicentre, non-inferiority, open-label randomised, cross-over clinical trial. Patients with mild to moderate POSA and daytime sleepiness (according to Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) > 10 points) will be randomised with a 1:1 allocation ratio, stratified by centre and AHI, to start with either PAP therapy or SPT and treated for 12 weeks. After a wash-out period of two weeks, they will switch to the other therapy for 12 weeks. The primary outcome is daytime sleepiness measured by the ESS at the end of each treatment phase. Analysis will be done in the intention-to-treat population using a linear mixed-effects model containing the intervention, the phase, the interaction between therapy and phase (including the carry-over effect) and the baseline measurement of the ESS and AHI as fixed effect, and centre and patient as random effects. A one-sided test at significant level of 2.5% will be used to test the non-inferiority of SPT with a non-inferiority margin of 1.35. Based on a sample size calculation with a one-sided one-sample t-test at significant level of 2.5%, assuming a standard deviation of 4, a total of 418 patients should be included to reach 80% power when SPT is only slightly inferior to PAP therapy (difference 0.8 resulting in a delta of 0.55 (1.35-0.8)). Assuming a 5% drop-out rate, 220 patients per sequence should be included. Possible futility stopping is planned at an interim analysis after 300 patients.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The recruitment of patients with mild to moderate POSA is feasible with the planned centres. Both certified interventions (PAP and SPT) are covered by the statutory health insurance companies as part of the trial guideline.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>DRKS00033048 registered 17. June 2024, http://www.drks.de .</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"26 1","pages":"295"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12363012/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-inferiority of sleep position therapy compared to positive airway pressure therapy with regard to daytime sleepiness in patients with mild to moderate position-dependent obstructive sleep apnoea (POSA): study protocol for a multicentre randomised cross-over trial.\",\"authors\":\"Nina Timmesfeld, Anja Neumann, Frederik Valbert, Jürgen Wasem, Alexandra Spillner, Christoph Schöbel\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13063-025-09007-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>First-line therapy for patients with clinically relevant obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is positive airway pressure therapy (PAP). At least one half of patients with mild to moderate OSA (apnoea-hypopnoea-index (AHI) 5-30/h) have positional OSA (POSA), where apnoea occurs mostly in supine sleep. These patients might benefit from sleep-position therapy (SPT) which should reduce sleeping time spent in a supine position. Until now, it is unclear whether SPT is non-inferior to PAP therapy for symptom relief in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a multicentre, non-inferiority, open-label randomised, cross-over clinical trial. Patients with mild to moderate POSA and daytime sleepiness (according to Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) > 10 points) will be randomised with a 1:1 allocation ratio, stratified by centre and AHI, to start with either PAP therapy or SPT and treated for 12 weeks. After a wash-out period of two weeks, they will switch to the other therapy for 12 weeks. The primary outcome is daytime sleepiness measured by the ESS at the end of each treatment phase. Analysis will be done in the intention-to-treat population using a linear mixed-effects model containing the intervention, the phase, the interaction between therapy and phase (including the carry-over effect) and the baseline measurement of the ESS and AHI as fixed effect, and centre and patient as random effects. A one-sided test at significant level of 2.5% will be used to test the non-inferiority of SPT with a non-inferiority margin of 1.35. Based on a sample size calculation with a one-sided one-sample t-test at significant level of 2.5%, assuming a standard deviation of 4, a total of 418 patients should be included to reach 80% power when SPT is only slightly inferior to PAP therapy (difference 0.8 resulting in a delta of 0.55 (1.35-0.8)). Assuming a 5% drop-out rate, 220 patients per sequence should be included. Possible futility stopping is planned at an interim analysis after 300 patients.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The recruitment of patients with mild to moderate POSA is feasible with the planned centres. Both certified interventions (PAP and SPT) are covered by the statutory health insurance companies as part of the trial guideline.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>DRKS00033048 registered 17. June 2024, http://www.drks.de .</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trials\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"295\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12363012/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-09007-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-09007-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:临床相关阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者的一线治疗是气道正压治疗(PAP)。至少有一半的轻中度OSA(呼吸暂停-低通气指数(AHI) 5-30/h)患者为体位性OSA (POSA),其中呼吸暂停主要发生在仰卧睡眠中。这些患者可能受益于睡眠姿势疗法(SPT),它可以减少仰卧姿势的睡眠时间。到目前为止,尚不清楚SPT在缓解这些患者症状方面是否优于PAP治疗。方法:这是一项多中心、非劣效性、开放标签、随机、交叉临床试验。轻度至中度POSA和白天嗜睡(根据Epworth嗜睡量表(ESS) bbb10分)的患者将按1:1的分配比例随机分组,按中心和AHI分层,开始接受PAP治疗或SPT治疗,治疗12周。在两周的洗脱期后,他们将切换到另一种治疗12周。主要结果是在每个治疗阶段结束时用ESS测量白天嗜睡。将在意向治疗人群中使用线性混合效应模型进行分析,该模型包含干预、阶段、治疗与阶段之间的相互作用(包括携带效应)以及ESS和AHI的基线测量作为固定效应,中心和患者作为随机效应。采用显著水平为2.5%的单侧检验检验SPT的非劣效性,非劣效性边际为1.35。根据在2.5%显著水平下单侧单样本t检验的样本量计算,假设标准差为4,当SPT仅略低于PAP治疗(差异0.8导致δ为0.55(1.35-0.8))时,应纳入418例患者以达到80%的功率。假设退出率为5%,则每个序列应包括220例患者。在对300名患者进行中期分析后,计划可能的无效停止。讨论:在计划的中心招募轻度至中度POSA患者是可行的。作为试验指导方针的一部分,法定健康保险公司涵盖经认证的干预措施(PAP和SPT)。试验注册:DRKS00033048注册17。2024年6月,http://www.drks.de。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Non-inferiority of sleep position therapy compared to positive airway pressure therapy with regard to daytime sleepiness in patients with mild to moderate position-dependent obstructive sleep apnoea (POSA): study protocol for a multicentre randomised cross-over trial.

Non-inferiority of sleep position therapy compared to positive airway pressure therapy with regard to daytime sleepiness in patients with mild to moderate position-dependent obstructive sleep apnoea (POSA): study protocol for a multicentre randomised cross-over trial.

Non-inferiority of sleep position therapy compared to positive airway pressure therapy with regard to daytime sleepiness in patients with mild to moderate position-dependent obstructive sleep apnoea (POSA): study protocol for a multicentre randomised cross-over trial.

Background: First-line therapy for patients with clinically relevant obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is positive airway pressure therapy (PAP). At least one half of patients with mild to moderate OSA (apnoea-hypopnoea-index (AHI) 5-30/h) have positional OSA (POSA), where apnoea occurs mostly in supine sleep. These patients might benefit from sleep-position therapy (SPT) which should reduce sleeping time spent in a supine position. Until now, it is unclear whether SPT is non-inferior to PAP therapy for symptom relief in these patients.

Methods: This is a multicentre, non-inferiority, open-label randomised, cross-over clinical trial. Patients with mild to moderate POSA and daytime sleepiness (according to Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) > 10 points) will be randomised with a 1:1 allocation ratio, stratified by centre and AHI, to start with either PAP therapy or SPT and treated for 12 weeks. After a wash-out period of two weeks, they will switch to the other therapy for 12 weeks. The primary outcome is daytime sleepiness measured by the ESS at the end of each treatment phase. Analysis will be done in the intention-to-treat population using a linear mixed-effects model containing the intervention, the phase, the interaction between therapy and phase (including the carry-over effect) and the baseline measurement of the ESS and AHI as fixed effect, and centre and patient as random effects. A one-sided test at significant level of 2.5% will be used to test the non-inferiority of SPT with a non-inferiority margin of 1.35. Based on a sample size calculation with a one-sided one-sample t-test at significant level of 2.5%, assuming a standard deviation of 4, a total of 418 patients should be included to reach 80% power when SPT is only slightly inferior to PAP therapy (difference 0.8 resulting in a delta of 0.55 (1.35-0.8)). Assuming a 5% drop-out rate, 220 patients per sequence should be included. Possible futility stopping is planned at an interim analysis after 300 patients.

Discussion: The recruitment of patients with mild to moderate POSA is feasible with the planned centres. Both certified interventions (PAP and SPT) are covered by the statutory health insurance companies as part of the trial guideline.

Trial registration: DRKS00033048 registered 17. June 2024, http://www.drks.de .

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信