辅助医护人员在标准护理中添加IM肾上腺素以缩短儿科院外心脏骤停患者到达初始肾上腺素剂量的时间——一项模拟试验

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Jay Loosley, Maysaa Assaf, Katie McKenzie, Saoirse Cameron, Katelyn Gray, Matthew Davis, Facundo Garcia-Bournissen, Michael Miller, Janice A Tijssen
{"title":"辅助医护人员在标准护理中添加IM肾上腺素以缩短儿科院外心脏骤停患者到达初始肾上腺素剂量的时间——一项模拟试验","authors":"Jay Loosley, Maysaa Assaf, Katie McKenzie, Saoirse Cameron, Katelyn Gray, Matthew Davis, Facundo Garcia-Bournissen, Michael Miller, Janice A Tijssen","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2536223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Survival rates for pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (POHCA) are low at around 10%. Paramedic services administer critical interventions including epinephrine. While typically administered via intravenous (IV) or intraosseous (IO) routes, obtaining these access points in out-of-hospital emergencies is challenging. We aimed to evaluate the time to first dose epinephrine and dosing accuracy in a simulated POHCA event.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Paramedics were randomized to one of three epinephrine administration routes: 1) IV or IO; 2) intramuscular (IM) by autoinjector; or 3) IM by needle/syringe. Each participant was asked to provide resuscitation to a school-aged mannequin with asystole, including administration of epinephrine via their randomized route. Participants were not directly informed of the outcome variables. The primary outcome was time to initial epinephrine dose for each route. Our secondary outcomes were non-inferiority time to definitive dose epinephrine (i.e., by IV or IO), time to secure vascular access (either IO or IV), and administration of correct epinephrine dose (within 20% of correct dose).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty six paramedics participated. We demonstrated a significant reduction in time to initial dose of epinephrine of 1.5 min (<i>p</i> < 0.001) by the IM route using epinephrine autoinjectors compared to standard of care by IV or IO. We also demonstrated that using a needle and syringe to administer epinephrine by the IM route offered no benefit in time to initial epinephrine dose and led to more dosing errors for the definitive dose of epinephrine (i.e., by IV or IO) (<i>n</i> = 4). We demonstrated that time to secure vascular access after IM injection with an auto-injector was delayed by 1:07 min (<i>p</i> = 0.002) compared to IV/IO.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study to demonstrate that IM epinephrine by autoinjector is feasible in a simulated POHCA scenario and confers a significant advantage in time to initial dose of epinephrine. This study will inform future human trials of IM epinephrine for POHCA.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addition of Intramuscular Epinephrine to Standard of Care by Paramedics to Decrease Time-to-Initial Epinephrine Dose in Pediatric Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Simulation Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Jay Loosley, Maysaa Assaf, Katie McKenzie, Saoirse Cameron, Katelyn Gray, Matthew Davis, Facundo Garcia-Bournissen, Michael Miller, Janice A Tijssen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10903127.2025.2536223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Survival rates for pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (POHCA) are low at around 10%. Paramedic services administer critical interventions including epinephrine. While typically administered via intravenous (IV) or intraosseous (IO) routes, obtaining these access points in out-of-hospital emergencies is challenging. We aimed to evaluate the time to first dose epinephrine and dosing accuracy in a simulated POHCA event.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Paramedics were randomized to one of three epinephrine administration routes: 1) IV or IO; 2) intramuscular (IM) by autoinjector; or 3) IM by needle/syringe. Each participant was asked to provide resuscitation to a school-aged mannequin with asystole, including administration of epinephrine via their randomized route. Participants were not directly informed of the outcome variables. The primary outcome was time to initial epinephrine dose for each route. Our secondary outcomes were non-inferiority time to definitive dose epinephrine (i.e., by IV or IO), time to secure vascular access (either IO or IV), and administration of correct epinephrine dose (within 20% of correct dose).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty six paramedics participated. We demonstrated a significant reduction in time to initial dose of epinephrine of 1.5 min (<i>p</i> < 0.001) by the IM route using epinephrine autoinjectors compared to standard of care by IV or IO. We also demonstrated that using a needle and syringe to administer epinephrine by the IM route offered no benefit in time to initial epinephrine dose and led to more dosing errors for the definitive dose of epinephrine (i.e., by IV or IO) (<i>n</i> = 4). We demonstrated that time to secure vascular access after IM injection with an auto-injector was delayed by 1:07 min (<i>p</i> = 0.002) compared to IV/IO.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study to demonstrate that IM epinephrine by autoinjector is feasible in a simulated POHCA scenario and confers a significant advantage in time to initial dose of epinephrine. This study will inform future human trials of IM epinephrine for POHCA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2536223\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2536223","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:儿科院外心脏骤停(POHCA)的存活率很低,约为10%。护理人员服务管理包括肾上腺素在内的关键干预措施。虽然通常通过静脉(IV)或骨内(IO)途径给药,但在院外紧急情况下获得这些接入点是具有挑战性的。我们的目的是评估模拟POHCA事件中首次给药肾上腺素的时间和给药准确性。方法:将护理人员随机分为三种肾上腺素给药途径:1-静脉注射或IO, 2-肌肉注射(IM),或3-注射针/注射器。每个参与者都被要求为一个学龄的无搏停止人体模型提供复苏,包括通过随机途径给药肾上腺素。参与者没有被直接告知结果变量。主要观察指标为每条途径到达初始肾上腺素剂量的时间。我们的次要结局是非劣效性的时间到确定剂量的肾上腺素(即静脉注射或静脉注射),确保血管通路的时间(静脉注射或静脉注射),以及给药正确的肾上腺素剂量(在正确剂量的20%以内)。结果:66名护理人员参与。我们证明了初始剂量肾上腺素的时间显著缩短了1.5分钟(p)。结论:这是第一个证明在模拟POHCA场景中,自动注射器注射肾上腺素是可行的,并且在时间上比初始剂量肾上腺素有显著优势的研究。这项研究将为今后IM肾上腺素治疗POHCA的人体试验提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Addition of Intramuscular Epinephrine to Standard of Care by Paramedics to Decrease Time-to-Initial Epinephrine Dose in Pediatric Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Simulation Trial.

Objectives: Survival rates for pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (POHCA) are low at around 10%. Paramedic services administer critical interventions including epinephrine. While typically administered via intravenous (IV) or intraosseous (IO) routes, obtaining these access points in out-of-hospital emergencies is challenging. We aimed to evaluate the time to first dose epinephrine and dosing accuracy in a simulated POHCA event.

Methods: Paramedics were randomized to one of three epinephrine administration routes: 1) IV or IO; 2) intramuscular (IM) by autoinjector; or 3) IM by needle/syringe. Each participant was asked to provide resuscitation to a school-aged mannequin with asystole, including administration of epinephrine via their randomized route. Participants were not directly informed of the outcome variables. The primary outcome was time to initial epinephrine dose for each route. Our secondary outcomes were non-inferiority time to definitive dose epinephrine (i.e., by IV or IO), time to secure vascular access (either IO or IV), and administration of correct epinephrine dose (within 20% of correct dose).

Results: Sixty six paramedics participated. We demonstrated a significant reduction in time to initial dose of epinephrine of 1.5 min (p < 0.001) by the IM route using epinephrine autoinjectors compared to standard of care by IV or IO. We also demonstrated that using a needle and syringe to administer epinephrine by the IM route offered no benefit in time to initial epinephrine dose and led to more dosing errors for the definitive dose of epinephrine (i.e., by IV or IO) (n = 4). We demonstrated that time to secure vascular access after IM injection with an auto-injector was delayed by 1:07 min (p = 0.002) compared to IV/IO.

Conclusions: This is the first study to demonstrate that IM epinephrine by autoinjector is feasible in a simulated POHCA scenario and confers a significant advantage in time to initial dose of epinephrine. This study will inform future human trials of IM epinephrine for POHCA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信