V Heinz, N Pilz, T Lindner, H F Brandt, Oliver Opatz, L Fesseler, A Patzak, T L Bothe
{"title":"Apple Watch在ems支持运动中能量消耗估算的准确性。","authors":"V Heinz, N Pilz, T Lindner, H F Brandt, Oliver Opatz, L Fesseler, A Patzak, T L Bothe","doi":"10.1088/1361-6579/adfcaf","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>Wearable devices are becoming increasingly prevalent, offering the capability to estimate energy expenditure. Among these devices, the Apple Watch has demonstrated notable results in estimating energy expenditure during physical activity, especially compared to other wearable devices. Its accuracy in determining energy expenditure during electromyostimulation (EMS) training remains unexplored and is investigated in this work.<i>Methods.</i>35 young, healthy adults completed two stepwise increasing bike ergometer protocols (50/30/3 protocol) until the maximum physical load was reached with and without EMS support. Energy expenditure estimates from the Apple Watch Series 7 (Apple Inc., Cupertino, California, USA) were compared against gold-standard spirometric calorimetry measurements.<i>Results.</i>The Apple Watch Series 7 underestimated energy expenditure compared to spirometric calorimetry for all data (mean difference: -27.4 kcal, LoA: 62.2 kcal), for ergometer exercise without EMS (mean difference: -28.8 kcal, LoA: 62.8 kcal), and for ergometer exercise with EMS (mean difference: -26.0 kcal, LoA: 62.4 kcal) data. We observed strong correlations between the Apple Watch Series 7 and spirometric calorimetry, with<i>r</i>= 0.93 (<i>p</i>< 0.001) for all data,<i>r</i>= 0.93 (<i>p</i>< 0.001) for exercise without EMS, and<i>r</i>= 0.93 (<i>p</i>< 0.001) for exercise with EMS.<i>Conclusion.</i>The Apple Watch Series 7 showed consistent accuracy in estimating energy expenditure during ergometer exercise, both with and without EMS. These findings suggest that the device can reliably monitor energy expenditure during EMS training, exhibiting similar accuracy limitations to conventional exercise settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":20047,"journal":{"name":"Physiological measurement","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of energy expenditure estimation by the Apple Watch in EMS-supported exercise.\",\"authors\":\"V Heinz, N Pilz, T Lindner, H F Brandt, Oliver Opatz, L Fesseler, A Patzak, T L Bothe\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6579/adfcaf\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>Wearable devices are becoming increasingly prevalent, offering the capability to estimate energy expenditure. Among these devices, the Apple Watch has demonstrated notable results in estimating energy expenditure during physical activity, especially compared to other wearable devices. Its accuracy in determining energy expenditure during electromyostimulation (EMS) training remains unexplored and is investigated in this work.<i>Methods.</i>35 young, healthy adults completed two stepwise increasing bike ergometer protocols (50/30/3 protocol) until the maximum physical load was reached with and without EMS support. Energy expenditure estimates from the Apple Watch Series 7 (Apple Inc., Cupertino, California, USA) were compared against gold-standard spirometric calorimetry measurements.<i>Results.</i>The Apple Watch Series 7 underestimated energy expenditure compared to spirometric calorimetry for all data (mean difference: -27.4 kcal, LoA: 62.2 kcal), for ergometer exercise without EMS (mean difference: -28.8 kcal, LoA: 62.8 kcal), and for ergometer exercise with EMS (mean difference: -26.0 kcal, LoA: 62.4 kcal) data. We observed strong correlations between the Apple Watch Series 7 and spirometric calorimetry, with<i>r</i>= 0.93 (<i>p</i>< 0.001) for all data,<i>r</i>= 0.93 (<i>p</i>< 0.001) for exercise without EMS, and<i>r</i>= 0.93 (<i>p</i>< 0.001) for exercise with EMS.<i>Conclusion.</i>The Apple Watch Series 7 showed consistent accuracy in estimating energy expenditure during ergometer exercise, both with and without EMS. These findings suggest that the device can reliably monitor energy expenditure during EMS training, exhibiting similar accuracy limitations to conventional exercise settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiological measurement\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiological measurement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/adfcaf\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological measurement","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/adfcaf","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:可穿戴设备正变得越来越普遍,提供了估计能量消耗的能力。在这些设备中,Apple Watch在估算身体活动期间的能量消耗方面表现出了显著的效果,尤其是与其他可穿戴设备相比。它在确定肌电刺激(EMS)训练期间能量消耗的准确性仍未得到探索,本研究对此进行了调查。方法:35名年轻健康的成年人完成了两种逐步增加的自行车测力仪方案(50/30/3方案),直到在有和没有EMS支持的情况下达到最大物理负荷。Apple Watch Series 7 (Apple Inc., Cupertino, California, USA)的能量消耗估算值与金标准的肺活量热法测量值进行了比较。
;结果:
;与肺活量热法测量值相比,Apple Watch Series 7低估了所有数据的能量消耗(平均差值:-27.4 kcal, LoA: 62.2 kcal),对于没有EMS的劳力计运动(平均差值:-28.8 kcal, LoA: 62.8 kcal),以及对于使用EMS的劳力计运动(平均差值:-26.0 kcal, LoA)。62.4千卡)数据。我们观察到Apple Watch Series 7与肺量热法之间存在很强的相关性,所有数据的r = 0.93 (p < 0.001),不使用EMS时的r = 0.93 (p < 0.001),使用EMS时的r = 0.93 (p < 0.001)。结论:无论是否使用EMS, Apple Watch Series 7在估算测力仪运动期间的能量消耗方面都显示出一致的准确性。这些发现表明,该设备可以可靠地监测EMS训练期间的能量消耗,显示出与传统运动设置相似的准确性限制。
。
Accuracy of energy expenditure estimation by the Apple Watch in EMS-supported exercise.
Objective.Wearable devices are becoming increasingly prevalent, offering the capability to estimate energy expenditure. Among these devices, the Apple Watch has demonstrated notable results in estimating energy expenditure during physical activity, especially compared to other wearable devices. Its accuracy in determining energy expenditure during electromyostimulation (EMS) training remains unexplored and is investigated in this work.Methods.35 young, healthy adults completed two stepwise increasing bike ergometer protocols (50/30/3 protocol) until the maximum physical load was reached with and without EMS support. Energy expenditure estimates from the Apple Watch Series 7 (Apple Inc., Cupertino, California, USA) were compared against gold-standard spirometric calorimetry measurements.Results.The Apple Watch Series 7 underestimated energy expenditure compared to spirometric calorimetry for all data (mean difference: -27.4 kcal, LoA: 62.2 kcal), for ergometer exercise without EMS (mean difference: -28.8 kcal, LoA: 62.8 kcal), and for ergometer exercise with EMS (mean difference: -26.0 kcal, LoA: 62.4 kcal) data. We observed strong correlations between the Apple Watch Series 7 and spirometric calorimetry, withr= 0.93 (p< 0.001) for all data,r= 0.93 (p< 0.001) for exercise without EMS, andr= 0.93 (p< 0.001) for exercise with EMS.Conclusion.The Apple Watch Series 7 showed consistent accuracy in estimating energy expenditure during ergometer exercise, both with and without EMS. These findings suggest that the device can reliably monitor energy expenditure during EMS training, exhibiting similar accuracy limitations to conventional exercise settings.
期刊介绍:
Physiological Measurement publishes papers about the quantitative assessment and visualization of physiological function in clinical research and practice, with an emphasis on the development of new methods of measurement and their validation.
Papers are published on topics including:
applied physiology in illness and health
electrical bioimpedance, optical and acoustic measurement techniques
advanced methods of time series and other data analysis
biomedical and clinical engineering
in-patient and ambulatory monitoring
point-of-care technologies
novel clinical measurements of cardiovascular, neurological, and musculoskeletal systems.
measurements in molecular, cellular and organ physiology and electrophysiology
physiological modeling and simulation
novel biomedical sensors, instruments, devices and systems
measurement standards and guidelines.