TRPS1在er阴性或低表达远处转移性乳腺癌中的应用。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Pathology & Oncology Research Pub Date : 2025-08-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/pore.2025.1612138
Runze Zhang, Jing Liu, Lei Jiang, Zhiqiang Lang
{"title":"TRPS1在er阴性或低表达远处转移性乳腺癌中的应用。","authors":"Runze Zhang, Jing Liu, Lei Jiang, Zhiqiang Lang","doi":"10.3389/pore.2025.1612138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Traditional markers have various limitations in recognizing the breast origin of distant metastatic breast carcinoma (DMBC), especially in ER-negative or low expression cases. In recent years, TRPS1 has been reported as a breast marker with satisfactory sensitivity and specificity in triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC). We aimed to compare the expression of TRPS1, GATA3, and GCDFP-15 in ER-negative or low-ER-expressing DMBC, and to further evaluate the diagnostic value of TRPS1.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Immunohistochemical staining for TRPS1, GATA3, and GCDFP-15 was performed in 107 cases of ER-negative or low expression DMBC specimens. Nuclear staining was considered positive for TRPS1 and GATA3, and cytoplasmic staining was considered positive for GCDFP-15.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The positive rates for TRPS1, GATA3, and GCDFP-15 were 90.65% (97/107), 91.59% (98/107), and 42.99% (46/107), respectively. There was no significant difference in the expression rate and intensity between the first two markers (<i>p</i> = 0.929), but both rates were significantly higher than that of GCDFP-15 (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Among these, 6 cases showed positive expression for TRPS1 while GATA3 and GCDFP-15 were negative; 8 cases showed positive expression for GATA3 while TRPS1 and GCDFP-15 were negative.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TRPS1 is as effective as GATA3 in confirming breast origin for ER-negative or low expression DMBC, and the two markers exhibit excellent complementary effects, both outperforming GCDFP-15. The combined application of TRPS1 and GATA3 is the optimal method to confirm that ER-negative or low-expression distant metastatic carcinoma originates from the breast.</p>","PeriodicalId":19981,"journal":{"name":"Pathology & Oncology Research","volume":"31 ","pages":"1612138"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12355182/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of TRPS1 in ER-negative or low expression distant metastatic breast carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Runze Zhang, Jing Liu, Lei Jiang, Zhiqiang Lang\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/pore.2025.1612138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Traditional markers have various limitations in recognizing the breast origin of distant metastatic breast carcinoma (DMBC), especially in ER-negative or low expression cases. In recent years, TRPS1 has been reported as a breast marker with satisfactory sensitivity and specificity in triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC). We aimed to compare the expression of TRPS1, GATA3, and GCDFP-15 in ER-negative or low-ER-expressing DMBC, and to further evaluate the diagnostic value of TRPS1.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Immunohistochemical staining for TRPS1, GATA3, and GCDFP-15 was performed in 107 cases of ER-negative or low expression DMBC specimens. Nuclear staining was considered positive for TRPS1 and GATA3, and cytoplasmic staining was considered positive for GCDFP-15.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The positive rates for TRPS1, GATA3, and GCDFP-15 were 90.65% (97/107), 91.59% (98/107), and 42.99% (46/107), respectively. There was no significant difference in the expression rate and intensity between the first two markers (<i>p</i> = 0.929), but both rates were significantly higher than that of GCDFP-15 (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Among these, 6 cases showed positive expression for TRPS1 while GATA3 and GCDFP-15 were negative; 8 cases showed positive expression for GATA3 while TRPS1 and GCDFP-15 were negative.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TRPS1 is as effective as GATA3 in confirming breast origin for ER-negative or low expression DMBC, and the two markers exhibit excellent complementary effects, both outperforming GCDFP-15. The combined application of TRPS1 and GATA3 is the optimal method to confirm that ER-negative or low-expression distant metastatic carcinoma originates from the breast.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pathology & Oncology Research\",\"volume\":\"31 \",\"pages\":\"1612138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12355182/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pathology & Oncology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/pore.2025.1612138\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathology & Oncology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/pore.2025.1612138","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:传统标志物在识别远处转移性乳腺癌(DMBC)的乳腺起源方面存在各种局限性,特别是在er阴性或低表达病例中。近年来,TRPS1作为一种乳腺标志物在三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)中具有令人满意的敏感性和特异性。我们旨在比较TRPS1、GATA3和GCDFP-15在er阴性或低er表达DMBC中的表达,进一步评价TRPS1的诊断价值。方法:对107例er阴性或低表达DMBC标本进行TRPS1、GATA3、GCDFP-15免疫组化染色。核染色认为TRPS1和GATA3阳性,细胞质染色认为GCDFP-15阳性。结果:TRPS1、GATA3、GCDFP-15的阳性率分别为90.65%(97/107)、91.59%(98/107)、42.99%(46/107)。前两种标记物的表达率和表达强度差异无统计学意义(p = 0.929),但均显著高于GCDFP-15 (p < 0.05)。其中TRPS1阳性表达6例,GATA3、GCDFP-15阴性表达;GATA3阳性表达8例,TRPS1、GCDFP-15阴性。结论:TRPS1与GATA3对er阴性或低表达DMBC的乳腺来源的确认效果相同,且两者具有良好的互补效应,均优于GCDFP-15。联合应用TRPS1和GATA3是确定er阴性或低表达远处转移癌起源于乳腺的最佳方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Application of TRPS1 in ER-negative or low expression distant metastatic breast carcinoma.

Application of TRPS1 in ER-negative or low expression distant metastatic breast carcinoma.

Application of TRPS1 in ER-negative or low expression distant metastatic breast carcinoma.

Application of TRPS1 in ER-negative or low expression distant metastatic breast carcinoma.

Purpose: Traditional markers have various limitations in recognizing the breast origin of distant metastatic breast carcinoma (DMBC), especially in ER-negative or low expression cases. In recent years, TRPS1 has been reported as a breast marker with satisfactory sensitivity and specificity in triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC). We aimed to compare the expression of TRPS1, GATA3, and GCDFP-15 in ER-negative or low-ER-expressing DMBC, and to further evaluate the diagnostic value of TRPS1.

Methods: Immunohistochemical staining for TRPS1, GATA3, and GCDFP-15 was performed in 107 cases of ER-negative or low expression DMBC specimens. Nuclear staining was considered positive for TRPS1 and GATA3, and cytoplasmic staining was considered positive for GCDFP-15.

Results: The positive rates for TRPS1, GATA3, and GCDFP-15 were 90.65% (97/107), 91.59% (98/107), and 42.99% (46/107), respectively. There was no significant difference in the expression rate and intensity between the first two markers (p = 0.929), but both rates were significantly higher than that of GCDFP-15 (p < 0.05). Among these, 6 cases showed positive expression for TRPS1 while GATA3 and GCDFP-15 were negative; 8 cases showed positive expression for GATA3 while TRPS1 and GCDFP-15 were negative.

Conclusion: TRPS1 is as effective as GATA3 in confirming breast origin for ER-negative or low expression DMBC, and the two markers exhibit excellent complementary effects, both outperforming GCDFP-15. The combined application of TRPS1 and GATA3 is the optimal method to confirm that ER-negative or low-expression distant metastatic carcinoma originates from the breast.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
134
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pathology & Oncology Research (POR) is an interdisciplinary Journal at the interface of pathology and oncology including the preclinical and translational research, diagnostics and therapy. Furthermore, POR is an international forum for the rapid communication of reviews, original research, critical and topical reports with excellence and novelty. Published quarterly, POR is dedicated to keeping scientists informed of developments on the selected biomedical fields bridging the gap between basic research and clinical medicine. It is a special aim for POR to promote pathological and oncological publishing activity of colleagues in the Central and East European region. The journal will be of interest to pathologists, and a broad range of experimental and clinical oncologists, and related experts. POR is supported by an acknowledged international advisory board and the Arányi Fundation for modern pathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信