微创后路同种异体骨融合术治疗骶髂关节不良事件的回顾性分析。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain Practice Pub Date : 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1111/papr.70071
Kwasi Ampomah, Abigail T Tisler, Anuj Shah, Rosa Garcia, Yue Yin, Timothy R Deer
{"title":"微创后路同种异体骨融合术治疗骶髂关节不良事件的回顾性分析。","authors":"Kwasi Ampomah, Abigail T Tisler, Anuj Shah, Rosa Garcia, Yue Yin, Timothy R Deer","doi":"10.1111/papr.70071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction is a significant contributor to chronic low back pain. Between 70% and 85% of people will suffer from low back pain (LBP) at some stage in their lives, and 15%-30% of these individuals will experience pain associated with the SIJ. With the limitations of conservative treatments in addressing the underlying pain and dysfunction, minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion has emerged as a promising intervention. Robust studies targeted towards examining complications associated with posterior approach SIJ fusions are rare; thus, this study aims to assess the incidence of adverse events (AEs) associated with posterior approach SIJ fusions using a cadaveric graft joint stabilization system in a clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective single-site study was conducted reviewing 260 patients with chronic SIJ dysfunction refractory to conservative management. Patients underwent SIJ fusion using the almond-shaped bone allograft with bone window (LinQ system, Painteq, and Tampa Florida) and were monitored for AEs up to 6 months post procedure. Descriptive statistics and hierarchical generalized linear models were used to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort primarily consisted of females (70.27%) with a mean age of 65.21 years. The incidence of AEs was low, with 2.3% at 3 months and 1.9% at 6 months post intervention. No major serious adverse events occurred related to the surgery. Minor adverse events included superficial infection and limited hematoma. All events resolved without permanent harm. There were no device-related events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The posterior approach to minimally invasive SIJ fusion using a human bone allograft demonstrates a favorable safety profile with a low incidence of adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":"25 7","pages":"e70071"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Retrospective Evaluation of Adverse Events in Minimally Invasive Posterior Approach With Bone Allograft in Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.\",\"authors\":\"Kwasi Ampomah, Abigail T Tisler, Anuj Shah, Rosa Garcia, Yue Yin, Timothy R Deer\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/papr.70071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction is a significant contributor to chronic low back pain. Between 70% and 85% of people will suffer from low back pain (LBP) at some stage in their lives, and 15%-30% of these individuals will experience pain associated with the SIJ. With the limitations of conservative treatments in addressing the underlying pain and dysfunction, minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion has emerged as a promising intervention. Robust studies targeted towards examining complications associated with posterior approach SIJ fusions are rare; thus, this study aims to assess the incidence of adverse events (AEs) associated with posterior approach SIJ fusions using a cadaveric graft joint stabilization system in a clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective single-site study was conducted reviewing 260 patients with chronic SIJ dysfunction refractory to conservative management. Patients underwent SIJ fusion using the almond-shaped bone allograft with bone window (LinQ system, Painteq, and Tampa Florida) and were monitored for AEs up to 6 months post procedure. Descriptive statistics and hierarchical generalized linear models were used to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort primarily consisted of females (70.27%) with a mean age of 65.21 years. The incidence of AEs was low, with 2.3% at 3 months and 1.9% at 6 months post intervention. No major serious adverse events occurred related to the surgery. Minor adverse events included superficial infection and limited hematoma. All events resolved without permanent harm. There were no device-related events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The posterior approach to minimally invasive SIJ fusion using a human bone allograft demonstrates a favorable safety profile with a low incidence of adverse events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain Practice\",\"volume\":\"25 7\",\"pages\":\"e70071\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.70071\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.70071","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

骶髂关节(SIJ)功能障碍是慢性腰痛的重要诱因。70%到85%的人在一生中的某个阶段会遭受腰痛(LBP)的折磨,其中15%到30%的人会经历与腰痛相关的疼痛。由于保守治疗在解决潜在疼痛和功能障碍方面的局限性,微创骶髂关节融合术已成为一种有希望的干预措施。针对后路SIJ融合相关并发症的有力研究很少;因此,本研究旨在评估在临床环境中使用尸体移植关节稳定系统后路SIJ融合相关不良事件(ae)的发生率。方法:对260例难保守治疗的慢性SIJ功能障碍患者进行回顾性单点研究。患者使用带骨窗的杏仁形异体骨移植物进行SIJ融合(LinQ系统,Painteq和Tampa Florida),并在术后6个月监测ae。采用描述性统计和层次广义线性模型对数据进行分析。结果:该队列主要为女性(70.27%),平均年龄为65.21岁。ae的发生率较低,干预后3个月为2.3%,6个月为1.9%。未发生与手术相关的重大严重不良事件。次要不良事件包括浅表感染和有限血肿。所有的事情都解决了,没有永久性的伤害。没有与设备相关的事件。结论:采用同种异体人骨后路微创SIJ融合具有良好的安全性和较低的不良事件发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Retrospective Evaluation of Adverse Events in Minimally Invasive Posterior Approach With Bone Allograft in Sacroiliac Joint Fusion.

Introduction: Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction is a significant contributor to chronic low back pain. Between 70% and 85% of people will suffer from low back pain (LBP) at some stage in their lives, and 15%-30% of these individuals will experience pain associated with the SIJ. With the limitations of conservative treatments in addressing the underlying pain and dysfunction, minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion has emerged as a promising intervention. Robust studies targeted towards examining complications associated with posterior approach SIJ fusions are rare; thus, this study aims to assess the incidence of adverse events (AEs) associated with posterior approach SIJ fusions using a cadaveric graft joint stabilization system in a clinical setting.

Methods: A retrospective single-site study was conducted reviewing 260 patients with chronic SIJ dysfunction refractory to conservative management. Patients underwent SIJ fusion using the almond-shaped bone allograft with bone window (LinQ system, Painteq, and Tampa Florida) and were monitored for AEs up to 6 months post procedure. Descriptive statistics and hierarchical generalized linear models were used to analyze the data.

Results: The cohort primarily consisted of females (70.27%) with a mean age of 65.21 years. The incidence of AEs was low, with 2.3% at 3 months and 1.9% at 6 months post intervention. No major serious adverse events occurred related to the surgery. Minor adverse events included superficial infection and limited hematoma. All events resolved without permanent harm. There were no device-related events.

Conclusion: The posterior approach to minimally invasive SIJ fusion using a human bone allograft demonstrates a favorable safety profile with a low incidence of adverse events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Practice
Pain Practice ANESTHESIOLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Practice, the official journal of the World Institute of Pain, publishes international multidisciplinary articles on pain and analgesia that provide its readership with up-to-date research, evaluation methods, and techniques for pain management. Special sections including the Consultant’s Corner, Images in Pain Practice, Case Studies from Mayo, Tutorials, and the Evidence-Based Medicine combine to give pain researchers, pain clinicians and pain fellows in training a systematic approach to continuing education in pain medicine. Prior to publication, all articles and reviews undergo peer review by at least two experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信