使用针关节镜进行肘关节镜检查时的能见度:一项尸体研究。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-14 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671251351326
Sho Yamauchi, Tetsuya Takenaga, Atsushi Tsuchiya, Satoshi Takeuchi, Keishi Takaba, Jumpei Inoue, Tomoya Ono, Kaisei Kuboya, Masahiro Nozaki, Hiroaki Fukushima, Hideki Murakami, Masahito Yoshida
{"title":"使用针关节镜进行肘关节镜检查时的能见度:一项尸体研究。","authors":"Sho Yamauchi, Tetsuya Takenaga, Atsushi Tsuchiya, Satoshi Takeuchi, Keishi Takaba, Jumpei Inoue, Tomoya Ono, Kaisei Kuboya, Masahiro Nozaki, Hiroaki Fukushima, Hideki Murakami, Masahito Yoshida","doi":"10.1177/23259671251351326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The visibility of the elbow joint during needle arthroscopy with 0° viewing is unknown. Moreover, the surgeon's level of experience required to perform needle arthroscopy with adequate proficiency has not been established.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To clarify visibility during elbow needle arthroscopy and investigate how the surgeon's experience affects it.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Descriptive laboratory study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty elbow specimens from 11 cadavers were used. A 1.9-mm needle arthroscope with a 0º viewing angle was inserted into 4 standard portals (anterolateral [ALP], anteromedial [AMP], lateral [LP], and posterior [PP]) to observe 18 different anatomic landmarks. The procedure was performed by 3 surgeons with >15 years of experience (ME) and 3 surgeons with lesser experience (LE) in elbow arthroscopy, defined as having performed ≤5 procedures. Each examiner evaluated 10 elbows. The observation times of all checkpoints from each portal were recorded and the mean durations compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of each structure that was adequately visualized using the ALP and AMP were 100% for each group. Successful visualization of structures through the LP was 100% in the ME group and ranged from 86.7% to 100% in the LE group. Visualization through the PP ranged from 56.7% to 86.7% in the ME group and from 53.3% to 83.3% in the LE group. The percentage of visibility for the posterior aspect of the lateral epicondyle was significantly lower in the ME group (56.7%; <i>P</i> = .008), and that for the border between the trochlear cartilage (56.7%; <i>P</i> = .008) and olecranon fossa (53.3%; <i>P</i> = .003) was significantly lower in the LE group. No significant differences in visibility rates were observed between the ME and LE groups across all 18 checkpoints. The mean observation times were not significantly different between groups for all portals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The needle arthroscope is a valuable tool for the arthroscopic examination of the anterior joint space and humeroulnar joints; however, visualizing the posterior joint space can be challenging, regardless of the surgeon's experience level. No significant difference was observed in the visibility probability based on experience.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The needle arthroscope can be beneficial for the management of elbow diseases in the anterior joint space and humeroulnar joints, regardless of the surgeon's experience level, and enables more precise diagnosis and treatment planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"13 8","pages":"23259671251351326"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12357031/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visibility During Elbow Arthroscopy Using Needle Arthroscope: A Cadaveric Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sho Yamauchi, Tetsuya Takenaga, Atsushi Tsuchiya, Satoshi Takeuchi, Keishi Takaba, Jumpei Inoue, Tomoya Ono, Kaisei Kuboya, Masahiro Nozaki, Hiroaki Fukushima, Hideki Murakami, Masahito Yoshida\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23259671251351326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The visibility of the elbow joint during needle arthroscopy with 0° viewing is unknown. Moreover, the surgeon's level of experience required to perform needle arthroscopy with adequate proficiency has not been established.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To clarify visibility during elbow needle arthroscopy and investigate how the surgeon's experience affects it.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Descriptive laboratory study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty elbow specimens from 11 cadavers were used. A 1.9-mm needle arthroscope with a 0º viewing angle was inserted into 4 standard portals (anterolateral [ALP], anteromedial [AMP], lateral [LP], and posterior [PP]) to observe 18 different anatomic landmarks. The procedure was performed by 3 surgeons with >15 years of experience (ME) and 3 surgeons with lesser experience (LE) in elbow arthroscopy, defined as having performed ≤5 procedures. Each examiner evaluated 10 elbows. The observation times of all checkpoints from each portal were recorded and the mean durations compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The percentage of each structure that was adequately visualized using the ALP and AMP were 100% for each group. Successful visualization of structures through the LP was 100% in the ME group and ranged from 86.7% to 100% in the LE group. Visualization through the PP ranged from 56.7% to 86.7% in the ME group and from 53.3% to 83.3% in the LE group. The percentage of visibility for the posterior aspect of the lateral epicondyle was significantly lower in the ME group (56.7%; <i>P</i> = .008), and that for the border between the trochlear cartilage (56.7%; <i>P</i> = .008) and olecranon fossa (53.3%; <i>P</i> = .003) was significantly lower in the LE group. No significant differences in visibility rates were observed between the ME and LE groups across all 18 checkpoints. The mean observation times were not significantly different between groups for all portals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The needle arthroscope is a valuable tool for the arthroscopic examination of the anterior joint space and humeroulnar joints; however, visualizing the posterior joint space can be challenging, regardless of the surgeon's experience level. No significant difference was observed in the visibility probability based on experience.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The needle arthroscope can be beneficial for the management of elbow diseases in the anterior joint space and humeroulnar joints, regardless of the surgeon's experience level, and enables more precise diagnosis and treatment planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\"13 8\",\"pages\":\"23259671251351326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12357031/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671251351326\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671251351326","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:0°关节镜下肘关节的可见性尚不清楚。此外,外科医生的经验水平需要足够熟练地进行针关节镜检查还没有确定。目的:阐明肘关节针镜检时的可视性,探讨术者经验对其的影响。研究设计:描述性实验室研究。方法:采用11具尸体20例肘部标本。将1.9 mm关节镜以0º视角置入4个标准关节门(前外侧[ALP]、前内侧[AMP]、外侧[LP]和后侧[PP]),观察18个不同的解剖标志。手术由3名具有15年以上经验(ME)的外科医生和3名具有较少肘关节镜经验(LE)的外科医生进行,定义为进行了≤5次手术。每位考官评估10个肘部。记录每个入口所有检查点的观察时间,并比较平均持续时间。结果:ALP和AMP对各组各结构的充分显像率均为100%。在ME组中,LP的结构可视化成功率为100%,在LE组中为86.7%至100%。通过PP显像,ME组为56.7% ~ 86.7%,LE组为53.3% ~ 83.3%。ME组外上髁后侧面的可见度明显低于ME组(56.7%,P = 0.008), LE组滑车软骨与鹰嘴窝交界处的可见度明显低于ME组(56.7%,P = 0.008)。在所有18个检查点中,观察到ME组和LE组之间的可见度没有显着差异。各组平均观察时间差异无统计学意义。结论:关节针镜是关节镜检查前关节间隙和肱骨尺关节的一种有价值的工具;然而,无论外科医生的经验水平如何,观察后关节间隙都具有挑战性。基于经验的可见概率无显著差异。临床意义:无论外科医生的经验水平如何,针状关节镜对于肘关节前间隙和肱骨尺关节疾病的治疗都是有益的,并且可以实现更精确的诊断和治疗计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Visibility During Elbow Arthroscopy Using Needle Arthroscope: A Cadaveric Study.

Background: The visibility of the elbow joint during needle arthroscopy with 0° viewing is unknown. Moreover, the surgeon's level of experience required to perform needle arthroscopy with adequate proficiency has not been established.

Purpose: To clarify visibility during elbow needle arthroscopy and investigate how the surgeon's experience affects it.

Study design: Descriptive laboratory study.

Methods: Twenty elbow specimens from 11 cadavers were used. A 1.9-mm needle arthroscope with a 0º viewing angle was inserted into 4 standard portals (anterolateral [ALP], anteromedial [AMP], lateral [LP], and posterior [PP]) to observe 18 different anatomic landmarks. The procedure was performed by 3 surgeons with >15 years of experience (ME) and 3 surgeons with lesser experience (LE) in elbow arthroscopy, defined as having performed ≤5 procedures. Each examiner evaluated 10 elbows. The observation times of all checkpoints from each portal were recorded and the mean durations compared.

Results: The percentage of each structure that was adequately visualized using the ALP and AMP were 100% for each group. Successful visualization of structures through the LP was 100% in the ME group and ranged from 86.7% to 100% in the LE group. Visualization through the PP ranged from 56.7% to 86.7% in the ME group and from 53.3% to 83.3% in the LE group. The percentage of visibility for the posterior aspect of the lateral epicondyle was significantly lower in the ME group (56.7%; P = .008), and that for the border between the trochlear cartilage (56.7%; P = .008) and olecranon fossa (53.3%; P = .003) was significantly lower in the LE group. No significant differences in visibility rates were observed between the ME and LE groups across all 18 checkpoints. The mean observation times were not significantly different between groups for all portals.

Conclusion: The needle arthroscope is a valuable tool for the arthroscopic examination of the anterior joint space and humeroulnar joints; however, visualizing the posterior joint space can be challenging, regardless of the surgeon's experience level. No significant difference was observed in the visibility probability based on experience.

Clinical relevance: The needle arthroscope can be beneficial for the management of elbow diseases in the anterior joint space and humeroulnar joints, regardless of the surgeon's experience level, and enables more precise diagnosis and treatment planning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信