阿片类药物和管理澳大利亚农村慢性非癌症疼痛的挑战:一项定性研究。

IF 8.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jessica A Thomas, Jill Benson, Philip Davidson, Paul R Ward
{"title":"阿片类药物和管理澳大利亚农村慢性非癌症疼痛的挑战:一项定性研究。","authors":"Jessica A Thomas, Jill Benson, Philip Davidson, Paul R Ward","doi":"10.5694/mja2.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate why rural general practitioners prescribe opioids for people with chronic non-cancer pain, with the aims of explaining geographic differences in opioid prescribing and improving pain management in rural areas.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Qualitative study; interviews with convenience sample of rural general practitioners.</p><p><strong>Setting, participants: </strong>Seventeen rural general practitioners who had prescribed opioids for people with chronic non-cancer pain during the preceding twelve months; the interviews were undertaken during 11 September 2023 - 31 May 2024.</p><p><strong>Major outcome measures: </strong>Contextual and individual factors that influence decision making by rural general practitioners about prescribing opioids for people with chronic non-cancer pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that rural opioid prescribing is influenced more by health care system deficiencies than lack of knowledge among practitioners. Two major themes were identified: systematic constraints (insufficient time for alternative management strategies and the influence of Medicare remuneration); and limited access to multidisciplinary pain management (limited availability of non-pharmaceutical treatments, colleagues for consultation, and referral pathways). Participants described feeling trapped between brief consultations and complex deprescribing requirements; Medicare remuneration schedules encourage shorter appointments (and therefore continuing current management) rather than comprehensive pain management. Implementing evidence-based guidelines was difficult in rural areas with limited resources. The limited availability of allied health services further restricted alternative pain management approaches. Participants reported greater psychological pressure to justify opioid deprescribing than prescribing. Doctors acknowledged that the evidence for the value of opioids for managing chronic pain was limited but felt caught between inadequate system resources and patient demands.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found a marked disparity between evidence-based guidelines for chronic pain management and the reality of rural medical practice. Rural doctors operating in a difficult context resort to prescribing opioids because of systemic inadequacies rather than lack of awareness of their limited value. Chronic pain management in rural areas could be improved by better Medicare support for longer pain management consultations, improved access to allied health, rural area-specific guidelines that take resource constraints into account, and improved support for general practitioners in pain management and deprescribing.</p>","PeriodicalId":18214,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Australia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opioids and the challenges of managing chronic non-cancer pain in rural Australia: a qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica A Thomas, Jill Benson, Philip Davidson, Paul R Ward\",\"doi\":\"10.5694/mja2.70022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate why rural general practitioners prescribe opioids for people with chronic non-cancer pain, with the aims of explaining geographic differences in opioid prescribing and improving pain management in rural areas.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Qualitative study; interviews with convenience sample of rural general practitioners.</p><p><strong>Setting, participants: </strong>Seventeen rural general practitioners who had prescribed opioids for people with chronic non-cancer pain during the preceding twelve months; the interviews were undertaken during 11 September 2023 - 31 May 2024.</p><p><strong>Major outcome measures: </strong>Contextual and individual factors that influence decision making by rural general practitioners about prescribing opioids for people with chronic non-cancer pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that rural opioid prescribing is influenced more by health care system deficiencies than lack of knowledge among practitioners. Two major themes were identified: systematic constraints (insufficient time for alternative management strategies and the influence of Medicare remuneration); and limited access to multidisciplinary pain management (limited availability of non-pharmaceutical treatments, colleagues for consultation, and referral pathways). Participants described feeling trapped between brief consultations and complex deprescribing requirements; Medicare remuneration schedules encourage shorter appointments (and therefore continuing current management) rather than comprehensive pain management. Implementing evidence-based guidelines was difficult in rural areas with limited resources. The limited availability of allied health services further restricted alternative pain management approaches. Participants reported greater psychological pressure to justify opioid deprescribing than prescribing. Doctors acknowledged that the evidence for the value of opioids for managing chronic pain was limited but felt caught between inadequate system resources and patient demands.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found a marked disparity between evidence-based guidelines for chronic pain management and the reality of rural medical practice. Rural doctors operating in a difficult context resort to prescribing opioids because of systemic inadequacies rather than lack of awareness of their limited value. Chronic pain management in rural areas could be improved by better Medicare support for longer pain management consultations, improved access to allied health, rural area-specific guidelines that take resource constraints into account, and improved support for general practitioners in pain management and deprescribing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of Australia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.70022\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.70022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨农村全科医生为慢性非癌性疼痛患者开具阿片类药物的原因,以解释阿片类药物处方的地理差异,改善农村地区的疼痛管理。研究设计:定性研究;方便样本农村全科医生访谈。背景,参与者:17名农村全科医生,他们在过去12个月内为患有慢性非癌症疼痛的人开过阿片类药物;访谈于2023年9月11日至2024年5月31日进行。主要结果测量:影响农村全科医生为慢性非癌性疼痛患者开阿片类药物处方决策的环境和个人因素。结果:我们发现农村阿片类药物处方更多地受到卫生保健系统缺陷的影响,而不是从业者缺乏知识。确定了两个主要主题:系统限制(没有足够的时间用于替代管理战略和医疗保险薪酬的影响);多学科疼痛管理的机会有限(非药物治疗、同事会诊和转诊途径有限)。参与者描述了在简短的咨询和复杂的描述需求之间陷入困境的感觉;医疗保险薪酬计划鼓励更短的预约(因此继续当前的管理),而不是全面的疼痛管理。在资源有限的农村地区很难实施循证指南。联合保健服务的有限性进一步限制了其他疼痛管理方法。参与者报告了更大的心理压力来证明阿片类药物处方比处方。医生们承认,阿片类药物在治疗慢性疼痛方面的价值证据有限,但在系统资源不足和患者需求之间感到进退两难。结论:我们发现慢性疼痛管理的循证指南与农村医疗实践的现实存在显著差异。农村医生在困难的情况下使用阿片类药物,是因为系统性不足,而不是缺乏对其有限价值的认识。农村地区的慢性疼痛管理可以通过更好的医疗保险支持更长时间的疼痛管理咨询,改善获得联合医疗的机会,考虑到资源限制的农村地区特定指南,以及改善对全科医生疼痛管理和处方的支持来改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Opioids and the challenges of managing chronic non-cancer pain in rural Australia: a qualitative study.

Objective: To investigate why rural general practitioners prescribe opioids for people with chronic non-cancer pain, with the aims of explaining geographic differences in opioid prescribing and improving pain management in rural areas.

Study design: Qualitative study; interviews with convenience sample of rural general practitioners.

Setting, participants: Seventeen rural general practitioners who had prescribed opioids for people with chronic non-cancer pain during the preceding twelve months; the interviews were undertaken during 11 September 2023 - 31 May 2024.

Major outcome measures: Contextual and individual factors that influence decision making by rural general practitioners about prescribing opioids for people with chronic non-cancer pain.

Results: We found that rural opioid prescribing is influenced more by health care system deficiencies than lack of knowledge among practitioners. Two major themes were identified: systematic constraints (insufficient time for alternative management strategies and the influence of Medicare remuneration); and limited access to multidisciplinary pain management (limited availability of non-pharmaceutical treatments, colleagues for consultation, and referral pathways). Participants described feeling trapped between brief consultations and complex deprescribing requirements; Medicare remuneration schedules encourage shorter appointments (and therefore continuing current management) rather than comprehensive pain management. Implementing evidence-based guidelines was difficult in rural areas with limited resources. The limited availability of allied health services further restricted alternative pain management approaches. Participants reported greater psychological pressure to justify opioid deprescribing than prescribing. Doctors acknowledged that the evidence for the value of opioids for managing chronic pain was limited but felt caught between inadequate system resources and patient demands.

Conclusion: We found a marked disparity between evidence-based guidelines for chronic pain management and the reality of rural medical practice. Rural doctors operating in a difficult context resort to prescribing opioids because of systemic inadequacies rather than lack of awareness of their limited value. Chronic pain management in rural areas could be improved by better Medicare support for longer pain management consultations, improved access to allied health, rural area-specific guidelines that take resource constraints into account, and improved support for general practitioners in pain management and deprescribing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Australia
Medical Journal of Australia 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
410
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) stands as Australia's foremost general medical journal, leading the dissemination of high-quality research and commentary to shape health policy and influence medical practices within the country. Under the leadership of Professor Virginia Barbour, the expert editorial team at MJA is dedicated to providing authors with a constructive and collaborative peer-review and publication process. Established in 1914, the MJA has evolved into a modern journal that upholds its founding values, maintaining a commitment to supporting the medical profession by delivering high-quality and pertinent information essential to medical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信