Heather Law, Huamao M Lin, Eileen Curran, Annette Szumski, Jacinta Wiens, Jennifer Blender, Emily S Venanzi, Erin L Schenk, Jessica J Lin, Jennifer C King
{"title":"生活质量在ALK+ NSCLC患者日常功能、与护理团队沟通和治疗决策中的作用","authors":"Heather Law, Huamao M Lin, Eileen Curran, Annette Szumski, Jacinta Wiens, Jennifer Blender, Emily S Venanzi, Erin L Schenk, Jessica J Lin, Jennifer C King","doi":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study investigated quality of life (QoL) and its role in treatment decision making among patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (<i>ALK</i>)+ NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with self-reported <i>ALK</i>+ NSCLC residing in the United States from the Lung Cancer Registry from GO2 for Lung Cancer were included. Measures included a core patient survey derived from Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 items (QLQ-C30) and QLQ - lung cancer module 29 items domains and an <i>ALK+</i> NSCLC module (ALK module). Associations were assessed between key domains and module questions using polyserial or Spearman's correlations and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-one patients with <i>ALK</i>+ NSCLC completed the ALK module. Most patients (85%) felt their current therapy helped stop cancer growth, helped them live longer, and was worth taking despite side effects; however, 80% reported some cancer scan-related anxiety and only 32% reported having received \"quite a bit\" or \"very much\" mental health support information from their care team. Most patients (75%) reported QoL as a top concern in treatment decisions, regardless of responses to other ALK module questions (all associations <i>p</i> ≥ 0.50). Although most patients (87%) perceived their physicians as interested in their QoL, only 51% reported their physicians discussed QoL as a top concern in treatment decisions. QLQ-C30 composite global health status-QoL score had significant moderate to strong correlations with all other QLQ-C30 and lung cancer module 29 items domains (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.004) and some components of communication with care teams, treatment confidence, and impact on daily life.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>QoL is important in treatment decision making for patients with <i>ALK+</i> NSCLC. These findings highlight areas for improvement in mental health support and patient-provider communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":17675,"journal":{"name":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","volume":"6 9","pages":"100863"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12354805/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of Quality of Life in Daily Functioning, Communication with Care Teams, and Treatment Decisions in Patients with <i>ALK</i>+ NSCLC.\",\"authors\":\"Heather Law, Huamao M Lin, Eileen Curran, Annette Szumski, Jacinta Wiens, Jennifer Blender, Emily S Venanzi, Erin L Schenk, Jessica J Lin, Jennifer C King\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100863\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study investigated quality of life (QoL) and its role in treatment decision making among patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (<i>ALK</i>)+ NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult patients with self-reported <i>ALK</i>+ NSCLC residing in the United States from the Lung Cancer Registry from GO2 for Lung Cancer were included. Measures included a core patient survey derived from Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 items (QLQ-C30) and QLQ - lung cancer module 29 items domains and an <i>ALK+</i> NSCLC module (ALK module). Associations were assessed between key domains and module questions using polyserial or Spearman's correlations and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-one patients with <i>ALK</i>+ NSCLC completed the ALK module. Most patients (85%) felt their current therapy helped stop cancer growth, helped them live longer, and was worth taking despite side effects; however, 80% reported some cancer scan-related anxiety and only 32% reported having received \\\"quite a bit\\\" or \\\"very much\\\" mental health support information from their care team. Most patients (75%) reported QoL as a top concern in treatment decisions, regardless of responses to other ALK module questions (all associations <i>p</i> ≥ 0.50). Although most patients (87%) perceived their physicians as interested in their QoL, only 51% reported their physicians discussed QoL as a top concern in treatment decisions. QLQ-C30 composite global health status-QoL score had significant moderate to strong correlations with all other QLQ-C30 and lung cancer module 29 items domains (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.004) and some components of communication with care teams, treatment confidence, and impact on daily life.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>QoL is important in treatment decision making for patients with <i>ALK+</i> NSCLC. These findings highlight areas for improvement in mental health support and patient-provider communication.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JTO Clinical and Research Reports\",\"volume\":\"6 9\",\"pages\":\"100863\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12354805/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JTO Clinical and Research Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100863\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtocrr.2025.100863","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Role of Quality of Life in Daily Functioning, Communication with Care Teams, and Treatment Decisions in Patients with ALK+ NSCLC.
Introduction: This study investigated quality of life (QoL) and its role in treatment decision making among patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)+ NSCLC.
Methods: Adult patients with self-reported ALK+ NSCLC residing in the United States from the Lung Cancer Registry from GO2 for Lung Cancer were included. Measures included a core patient survey derived from Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 items (QLQ-C30) and QLQ - lung cancer module 29 items domains and an ALK+ NSCLC module (ALK module). Associations were assessed between key domains and module questions using polyserial or Spearman's correlations and Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests.
Results: Seventy-one patients with ALK+ NSCLC completed the ALK module. Most patients (85%) felt their current therapy helped stop cancer growth, helped them live longer, and was worth taking despite side effects; however, 80% reported some cancer scan-related anxiety and only 32% reported having received "quite a bit" or "very much" mental health support information from their care team. Most patients (75%) reported QoL as a top concern in treatment decisions, regardless of responses to other ALK module questions (all associations p ≥ 0.50). Although most patients (87%) perceived their physicians as interested in their QoL, only 51% reported their physicians discussed QoL as a top concern in treatment decisions. QLQ-C30 composite global health status-QoL score had significant moderate to strong correlations with all other QLQ-C30 and lung cancer module 29 items domains (p ≤ 0.004) and some components of communication with care teams, treatment confidence, and impact on daily life.
Conclusions: QoL is important in treatment decision making for patients with ALK+ NSCLC. These findings highlight areas for improvement in mental health support and patient-provider communication.