{"title":"西欧和北欧人群胃萎缩的患病率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Eoghan Burke, Patricia Harkins, Mayilone Arumugasamy","doi":"10.1007/s12029-025-01291-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastric atrophy (GA) is a pre-neoplastic condition leading to gastric cancer (GC). Early GA detection is critical for guiding surveillance and preventing advanced GC. Histology is the current gold standard for GA diagnosis, but is considered not cost-effective for routine screening in Western populations. Serological methods offer a potentially affordable alternative. Understanding GA prevalence, symptom impact, and optimal detection strategies in low-risk Western populations is essential before integrating GA screening into GC prevention programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed GA prevalence in Northern and Western European populations. Key outcomes included GA prevalence (any topographical distribution in the stomach and corpus-specific), effects of symptomatology on prevalence, and differences between serological and histological prevalence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two cross-sectional studies (n = 62,520) were included; 13 used histology and 9 used serology. Overall GA prevalence of any topographical distribution was 13% (95% confidence interval (CI) 7-18%). Histology-based studies reported 21% (95% CI 11-30%) versus 5% (95% CI 3-7%) by serology. Corpus-involving GA had a pooled prevalence of 6% (95% CI 4-9%), with histology detecting higher rates (10-15%) than serology (4-5%). In symptomatic populations, GA prevalence rose to 47%, compared to 6-10% in asymptomatic groups. Corpus GA reached 20% in symptomatic patients versus 6-8% in asymptomatic ones.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GA, especially corpus-involving GA, is more prevalent in Western and Northern European populations than previously thought. These findings suggest that screening for GA in these populations may be a viable route to increasing early GC detection rates and improving outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"56 1","pages":"174"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12364980/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Prevalence of Gastric Atrophy in Western and Northern European Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Eoghan Burke, Patricia Harkins, Mayilone Arumugasamy\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12029-025-01291-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastric atrophy (GA) is a pre-neoplastic condition leading to gastric cancer (GC). Early GA detection is critical for guiding surveillance and preventing advanced GC. Histology is the current gold standard for GA diagnosis, but is considered not cost-effective for routine screening in Western populations. Serological methods offer a potentially affordable alternative. Understanding GA prevalence, symptom impact, and optimal detection strategies in low-risk Western populations is essential before integrating GA screening into GC prevention programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed GA prevalence in Northern and Western European populations. Key outcomes included GA prevalence (any topographical distribution in the stomach and corpus-specific), effects of symptomatology on prevalence, and differences between serological and histological prevalence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-two cross-sectional studies (n = 62,520) were included; 13 used histology and 9 used serology. Overall GA prevalence of any topographical distribution was 13% (95% confidence interval (CI) 7-18%). Histology-based studies reported 21% (95% CI 11-30%) versus 5% (95% CI 3-7%) by serology. Corpus-involving GA had a pooled prevalence of 6% (95% CI 4-9%), with histology detecting higher rates (10-15%) than serology (4-5%). In symptomatic populations, GA prevalence rose to 47%, compared to 6-10% in asymptomatic groups. Corpus GA reached 20% in symptomatic patients versus 6-8% in asymptomatic ones.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GA, especially corpus-involving GA, is more prevalent in Western and Northern European populations than previously thought. These findings suggest that screening for GA in these populations may be a viable route to increasing early GC detection rates and improving outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12364980/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-025-01291-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-025-01291-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:胃萎缩(GA)是导致胃癌(GC)的肿瘤前病变。早期遗传变异检测对于指导监测和预防晚期遗传变异至关重要。组织学是目前GA诊断的金标准,但在西方人群中,常规筛查被认为不具有成本效益。血清学方法提供了一种可能负担得起的替代方法。在将GA筛查纳入GC预防计划之前,了解低风险西方人群的GA患病率,症状影响和最佳检测策略是必不可少的。方法:本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了北欧和西欧人群中GA的患病率。主要结果包括GA患病率(胃和体特异性的任何地形分布),症状学对患病率的影响,以及血清学和组织学患病率之间的差异。结果:纳入22项横断面研究(n = 62,520);组织学13例,血清学9例。任何地形分布的总体GA患病率为13%(95%置信区间(CI) 7-18%)。基于组织学的研究报告血清学为21% (95% CI 11-30%),而血清学为5% (95% CI 3-7%)。涉及语料库的GA总患病率为6% (95% CI为4-9%),组织学检出率(10-15%)高于血清学检出率(4-5%)。在有症状人群中,GA患病率上升至47%,而在无症状人群中为6-10%。在有症状的患者中,语料库GA达到20%,而在无症状的患者中为6-8%。结论:GA,特别是涉及语料库的GA,在西欧和北欧人群中比以前认为的更为普遍。这些发现表明,在这些人群中筛查GA可能是提高早期GC检出率和改善预后的可行途径。
The Prevalence of Gastric Atrophy in Western and Northern European Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Background: Gastric atrophy (GA) is a pre-neoplastic condition leading to gastric cancer (GC). Early GA detection is critical for guiding surveillance and preventing advanced GC. Histology is the current gold standard for GA diagnosis, but is considered not cost-effective for routine screening in Western populations. Serological methods offer a potentially affordable alternative. Understanding GA prevalence, symptom impact, and optimal detection strategies in low-risk Western populations is essential before integrating GA screening into GC prevention programs.
Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed GA prevalence in Northern and Western European populations. Key outcomes included GA prevalence (any topographical distribution in the stomach and corpus-specific), effects of symptomatology on prevalence, and differences between serological and histological prevalence.
Results: Twenty-two cross-sectional studies (n = 62,520) were included; 13 used histology and 9 used serology. Overall GA prevalence of any topographical distribution was 13% (95% confidence interval (CI) 7-18%). Histology-based studies reported 21% (95% CI 11-30%) versus 5% (95% CI 3-7%) by serology. Corpus-involving GA had a pooled prevalence of 6% (95% CI 4-9%), with histology detecting higher rates (10-15%) than serology (4-5%). In symptomatic populations, GA prevalence rose to 47%, compared to 6-10% in asymptomatic groups. Corpus GA reached 20% in symptomatic patients versus 6-8% in asymptomatic ones.
Conclusion: GA, especially corpus-involving GA, is more prevalent in Western and Northern European populations than previously thought. These findings suggest that screening for GA in these populations may be a viable route to increasing early GC detection rates and improving outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer is a multidisciplinary medium for the publication of novel research pertaining to cancers arising from the gastrointestinal tract.The journal is dedicated to the most rapid publication possible.The journal publishes papers in all relevant fields, emphasizing those studies that are helpful in understanding and treating cancers affecting the esophagus, stomach, liver, gallbladder and biliary tree, pancreas, small bowel, large bowel, rectum, and anus. In addition, the Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer publishes basic and translational scientific information from studies providing insight into the etiology and progression of cancers affecting these organs. New insights are provided from diverse areas of research such as studies exploring pre-neoplastic states, risk factors, epidemiology, genetics, preclinical therapeutics, surgery, radiation therapy, novel medical therapeutics, clinical trials, and outcome studies.In addition to reports of original clinical and experimental studies, the journal also publishes: case reports, state-of-the-art reviews on topics of immediate interest or importance; invited articles analyzing particular areas of pancreatic research and knowledge; perspectives in which critical evaluation and conflicting opinions about current topics may be expressed; meeting highlights that summarize important points presented at recent meetings; abstracts of symposia and conferences; book reviews; hypotheses; Letters to the Editors; and other items of special interest, including:Complex Cases in GI Oncology: This is a new initiative to provide a forum to review and discuss the history and management of complex and involved gastrointestinal oncology cases. The format will be similar to a teaching case conference where a case vignette is presented and is followed by a series of questions and discussion points. A brief reference list supporting the points made in discussion would be expected.