真实世界心脏病专家表现(RWCP)评分对射频消融后房颤复发风险的预测价值

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yangyang Wang, Jingchao He, Yang Shao, Tong Liu, Aolin Ding, Guohua Xue, Yubing Guo, Pengyu Wu, Yunfei Gu, Hao Wang
{"title":"真实世界心脏病专家表现(RWCP)评分对射频消融后房颤复发风险的预测价值","authors":"Yangyang Wang, Jingchao He, Yang Shao, Tong Liu, Aolin Ding, Guohua Xue, Yubing Guo, Pengyu Wu, Yunfei Gu, Hao Wang","doi":"10.1111/jce.70067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the predictive value of Real-world Cardiologist Performance (RWCP) score for atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence risk after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with nonvalvular AF who underwent first-time RFCA at Luoyang Central Hospital affiliated to Zhengzhou University between October 2021 and June 2023 were included in this study. Detailed ablation data were exported from CARTO®3 system (Biosense Webster, USA), based on which, four parameters, including discharge time proportion, Catheter Contact Force Stability (C3-FOT proportion), Ablation Index Consistency (SURPOINT/TOP-4 proportion) and fragmented points proportion, were calculated. Then, the RWCP score was calculated from these parameters for each patient. Predictive value of the RWCP score for AF recurrence risk were assessed using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 148 AF patients were enrolled, including 68 males and 80 females. During follow-up, 30 patients (20.3%) experienced AF recurrence. The RWCP score was calculated using Cox regression coefficients: RWCP score = (left ring discharge time ratio × 2.853) - (left C3-FOT proportion × 0.91) + (left SURPOINT/TOP4 × 2.943) + (left fragmented points proportion × 0.423) - (right ring discharge time ratio × 4.039) - (right C3-FOT proportion × 6.159) - (right SURPOINT/TOP4 × 1.312) - (right points fragmented proportion × 4.425). It was found that patients with higher RWCP scores (-12.53 to 5.79) had higher recurrence risk than those with low scores (-28.68 to -12.76) (HR = 5.55, 95% CI: 2.23-13.80, p = 0.0002). Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed this (p<sub>log-rank</sub> < 0.001). To simplify the operation of RWCP, an online calculator was explored using shiny platform (https://doctorwanghao.shinyapps.io/RWCP_English/).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The RWCP score shows promise as a tool for evaluating ablation completeness, assessing cardiologist performance and predicting AF recurrence risk after ablation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Predictive Value of Real-World Cardiologist Performance (RWCP) Score in Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Risk After Radiofrequency Ablation.\",\"authors\":\"Yangyang Wang, Jingchao He, Yang Shao, Tong Liu, Aolin Ding, Guohua Xue, Yubing Guo, Pengyu Wu, Yunfei Gu, Hao Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jce.70067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the predictive value of Real-world Cardiologist Performance (RWCP) score for atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence risk after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with nonvalvular AF who underwent first-time RFCA at Luoyang Central Hospital affiliated to Zhengzhou University between October 2021 and June 2023 were included in this study. Detailed ablation data were exported from CARTO®3 system (Biosense Webster, USA), based on which, four parameters, including discharge time proportion, Catheter Contact Force Stability (C3-FOT proportion), Ablation Index Consistency (SURPOINT/TOP-4 proportion) and fragmented points proportion, were calculated. Then, the RWCP score was calculated from these parameters for each patient. Predictive value of the RWCP score for AF recurrence risk were assessed using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 148 AF patients were enrolled, including 68 males and 80 females. During follow-up, 30 patients (20.3%) experienced AF recurrence. The RWCP score was calculated using Cox regression coefficients: RWCP score = (left ring discharge time ratio × 2.853) - (left C3-FOT proportion × 0.91) + (left SURPOINT/TOP4 × 2.943) + (left fragmented points proportion × 0.423) - (right ring discharge time ratio × 4.039) - (right C3-FOT proportion × 6.159) - (right SURPOINT/TOP4 × 1.312) - (right points fragmented proportion × 4.425). It was found that patients with higher RWCP scores (-12.53 to 5.79) had higher recurrence risk than those with low scores (-28.68 to -12.76) (HR = 5.55, 95% CI: 2.23-13.80, p = 0.0002). Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed this (p<sub>log-rank</sub> < 0.001). To simplify the operation of RWCP, an online calculator was explored using shiny platform (https://doctorwanghao.shinyapps.io/RWCP_English/).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The RWCP score shows promise as a tool for evaluating ablation completeness, assessing cardiologist performance and predicting AF recurrence risk after ablation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.70067\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.70067","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨Real-world Cardiologist Performance (RWCP)评分对射频导管消融(RFCA)后房颤(AF)复发风险的预测价值。方法:本研究纳入2021年10月至2023年6月在郑州大学附属洛阳中心医院首次行RFCA的非瓣膜性房颤患者。从CARTO®3系统(Biosense Webster, USA)导出详细的消融数据,并在此基础上计算4个参数,包括放电时间比例、导管接触力稳定性(C3-FOT比例)、消融指数一致性(SURPOINT/TOP-4比例)和碎片点比例。然后,根据这些参数计算每位患者的RWCP评分。采用Cox回归和Kaplan-Meier分析评估RWCP评分对房颤复发风险的预测价值。结果:共纳入148例房颤患者,其中男性68例,女性80例。随访期间,30例(20.3%)发生房颤复发。采用Cox回归系数计算RWCP评分:RWCP评分=(左环放电时间比× 2.853) -(左C3-FOT比例× 0.91) +(左SURPOINT/TOP4 × 2.943) +(左碎片点比例× 0.423) -(右环放电时间比× 4.039) -(右C3-FOT比例× 6.159) -(右SURPOINT/TOP4 × 1.312) -(右碎片点比例× 4.425)。RWCP评分较高的患者(-12.53 ~ 5.79)的复发风险高于评分较低的患者(-28.68 ~ -12.76)(HR = 5.55, 95% CI: 2.23 ~ 13.80, p = 0.0002)。Kaplan-Meier分析证实了这一结论(plog-rank): RWCP评分有望作为评估消融完整性、评估心脏科医生表现和预测消融后房颤复发风险的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Predictive Value of Real-World Cardiologist Performance (RWCP) Score in Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence Risk After Radiofrequency Ablation.

Objective: To explore the predictive value of Real-world Cardiologist Performance (RWCP) score for atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence risk after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA).

Methods: Patients with nonvalvular AF who underwent first-time RFCA at Luoyang Central Hospital affiliated to Zhengzhou University between October 2021 and June 2023 were included in this study. Detailed ablation data were exported from CARTO®3 system (Biosense Webster, USA), based on which, four parameters, including discharge time proportion, Catheter Contact Force Stability (C3-FOT proportion), Ablation Index Consistency (SURPOINT/TOP-4 proportion) and fragmented points proportion, were calculated. Then, the RWCP score was calculated from these parameters for each patient. Predictive value of the RWCP score for AF recurrence risk were assessed using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses.

Results: A total of 148 AF patients were enrolled, including 68 males and 80 females. During follow-up, 30 patients (20.3%) experienced AF recurrence. The RWCP score was calculated using Cox regression coefficients: RWCP score = (left ring discharge time ratio × 2.853) - (left C3-FOT proportion × 0.91) + (left SURPOINT/TOP4 × 2.943) + (left fragmented points proportion × 0.423) - (right ring discharge time ratio × 4.039) - (right C3-FOT proportion × 6.159) - (right SURPOINT/TOP4 × 1.312) - (right points fragmented proportion × 4.425). It was found that patients with higher RWCP scores (-12.53 to 5.79) had higher recurrence risk than those with low scores (-28.68 to -12.76) (HR = 5.55, 95% CI: 2.23-13.80, p = 0.0002). Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed this (plog-rank < 0.001). To simplify the operation of RWCP, an online calculator was explored using shiny platform (https://doctorwanghao.shinyapps.io/RWCP_English/).

Conclusion: The RWCP score shows promise as a tool for evaluating ablation completeness, assessing cardiologist performance and predicting AF recurrence risk after ablation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信