Alvaro Zevallos Barboza, Sagori Mukhopadhyay, Karen Marie Puopolo, Di Shu, Jeffrey S Gerber, Dustin Daniel Flannery
{"title":"新生儿重症监护病房抗生素使用指标的比较。","authors":"Alvaro Zevallos Barboza, Sagori Mukhopadhyay, Karen Marie Puopolo, Di Shu, Jeffrey S Gerber, Dustin Daniel Flannery","doi":"10.1017/ice.2025.10233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare temporal trends, variation, and correlations between antibiotic use metrics across U.S. neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and assess associations with mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 438,156 infants admitted to 272 NICUs from 2017 to 2021 using the Premier Health Database. Antibiotic use rate (AUR), days of therapy (DOT), and antibiotic spectrum index (ASI) per 1,000 patient or therapy days were calculated both cumulatively by year and at the center level. Mixed-effects models adjusted for center-level characteristics were used for all analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three metrics declined over time: AUR by 16.8%, DOT by 19.0%, and ASI by 2.5%. AUR and DOT were highly correlated (<i>r</i> = 0.989, <i>P</i> < 0.001), while ASI showed weaker correlations with AUR (<i>r</i> = 0.247, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and DOT (<i>r</i> = 0.338, <i>P</i> < 0.001). None were significantly associated with center-level mortality. ASI had the least variability, indicating more uniform antibiotic selection and lower center-level discriminatory value.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DOT and AUR were comparable measures of antibiotic consumption, both showing significant declines. ASI exhibited the least variability, reflecting more consistency in antibiotic selection. The similarity in dispersion and decline between AUR and DOT suggests that neonatal antibiotic exposure is primarily influenced by initiation and discontinuation decisions rather than regimen complexity. Given its ease of calculation, AUR may be the most practical metric for evaluating the impact of antibiotic stewardship interventions at the center level.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of metrics of neonatal intensive care unit antibiotic use.\",\"authors\":\"Alvaro Zevallos Barboza, Sagori Mukhopadhyay, Karen Marie Puopolo, Di Shu, Jeffrey S Gerber, Dustin Daniel Flannery\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ice.2025.10233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare temporal trends, variation, and correlations between antibiotic use metrics across U.S. neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and assess associations with mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 438,156 infants admitted to 272 NICUs from 2017 to 2021 using the Premier Health Database. Antibiotic use rate (AUR), days of therapy (DOT), and antibiotic spectrum index (ASI) per 1,000 patient or therapy days were calculated both cumulatively by year and at the center level. Mixed-effects models adjusted for center-level characteristics were used for all analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three metrics declined over time: AUR by 16.8%, DOT by 19.0%, and ASI by 2.5%. AUR and DOT were highly correlated (<i>r</i> = 0.989, <i>P</i> < 0.001), while ASI showed weaker correlations with AUR (<i>r</i> = 0.247, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and DOT (<i>r</i> = 0.338, <i>P</i> < 0.001). None were significantly associated with center-level mortality. ASI had the least variability, indicating more uniform antibiotic selection and lower center-level discriminatory value.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DOT and AUR were comparable measures of antibiotic consumption, both showing significant declines. ASI exhibited the least variability, reflecting more consistency in antibiotic selection. The similarity in dispersion and decline between AUR and DOT suggests that neonatal antibiotic exposure is primarily influenced by initiation and discontinuation decisions rather than regimen complexity. Given its ease of calculation, AUR may be the most practical metric for evaluating the impact of antibiotic stewardship interventions at the center level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2025.10233\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2025.10233","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:比较美国新生儿重症监护病房(NICUs)抗生素使用指标的时间趋势、变化和相关性,并评估其与死亡率的关系。方法:我们使用Premier Health数据库对2017年至2021年272个新生儿重症监护病房收治的438,156名婴儿进行了回顾性队列研究。抗生素使用率(AUR)、治疗天数(DOT)和每1000名患者或治疗天数的抗生素谱指数(ASI)按年累积计算,并在中心水平计算。所有分析均采用调整中心水平特征的混合效应模型。结果:所有三个指标随着时间的推移而下降:AUR下降了16.8%,DOT下降了19.0%,ASI下降了2.5%。AUR与DOT高度相关(r = 0.989, P < 0.001), ASI与AUR (r = 0.247, P < 0.001)、DOT相关性较弱(r = 0.338, P < 0.001)。没有一个与中心水平死亡率显著相关。ASI变异性最小,表明抗生素选择更均匀,中心水平判别值更低。结论:DOT和AUR是抗生素消耗的可比指标,两者均显示显着下降。ASI表现出最小的变异性,反映了抗生素选择的一致性。AUR和DOT在分散和下降方面的相似性表明,新生儿抗生素暴露主要受开始和停止决定的影响,而不是方案的复杂性。鉴于其易于计算,AUR可能是评估抗生素管理干预措施在中心层面影响的最实用指标。
Comparison of metrics of neonatal intensive care unit antibiotic use.
Objective: To compare temporal trends, variation, and correlations between antibiotic use metrics across U.S. neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and assess associations with mortality.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 438,156 infants admitted to 272 NICUs from 2017 to 2021 using the Premier Health Database. Antibiotic use rate (AUR), days of therapy (DOT), and antibiotic spectrum index (ASI) per 1,000 patient or therapy days were calculated both cumulatively by year and at the center level. Mixed-effects models adjusted for center-level characteristics were used for all analyses.
Results: All three metrics declined over time: AUR by 16.8%, DOT by 19.0%, and ASI by 2.5%. AUR and DOT were highly correlated (r = 0.989, P < 0.001), while ASI showed weaker correlations with AUR (r = 0.247, P < 0.001) and DOT (r = 0.338, P < 0.001). None were significantly associated with center-level mortality. ASI had the least variability, indicating more uniform antibiotic selection and lower center-level discriminatory value.
Conclusions: DOT and AUR were comparable measures of antibiotic consumption, both showing significant declines. ASI exhibited the least variability, reflecting more consistency in antibiotic selection. The similarity in dispersion and decline between AUR and DOT suggests that neonatal antibiotic exposure is primarily influenced by initiation and discontinuation decisions rather than regimen complexity. Given its ease of calculation, AUR may be the most practical metric for evaluating the impact of antibiotic stewardship interventions at the center level.
期刊介绍:
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology provides original, peer-reviewed scientific articles for anyone involved with an infection control or epidemiology program in a hospital or healthcare facility. Written by infection control practitioners and epidemiologists and guided by an editorial board composed of the nation''s leaders in the field, ICHE provides a critical forum for this vital information.