{"title":"肝硬化门静脉系统血栓CT增强扫描的漏诊率:某三级医院影像学报告回顾。","authors":"Siqi Jia, Huiyuan Lu, Ting Wang, Wenhui Huo, Zhuang Liu, Yueying Shi, Libo Zhang, Xingshun Qi","doi":"10.1007/s11739-025-04076-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Portal venous system thrombosis (PVST) negatively influences the outcomes of cirrhotic patients. Its accurate diagnosis is essential for treatment selection and prognostic assessment, but it is usually missed in clinical practice. Overall, 684 contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) scans were performed in cirrhotic patients who were consecutively admitted from January 2015 to June 2023, and were retrospectively reviewed by two independent researchers. Weighted-kappa was calculated to estimate the consistency of the two researchers in the diagnosis of PVST. If their conclusions were inconsistent, a senior researcher would be invited to make a final diagnosis. Clinically significant PVST (CSPVST) was further identified. By comparing the researchers' diagnosis with the radiology reports, the missed diagnosis rate of PVST was calculated. The Kappa coefficient was 0.85, indicating almost perfect consistency in the diagnosis of PVST between the two researchers. In total, PVST was diagnosed by the researchers on 278 (40.64%) of the 684 scans; and among them, a diagnosis of PVST was not recorded in 168 radiology reports. Thus, the missed diagnosis rate of PVST was 60.43% (168/278). CSPVST was diagnosed by the researchers on 87 (12.72%) scans; and among them, a diagnosis of PVST was not recorded in 38 radiology reports. Thus, the missed diagnosis rate of CSPVST was 43.68% (38/87). If a diagnosis of PVST was made only according to the radiology reports, a very high proportion of PVST would be missed. Considering a high rate of PVST detection in cirrhosis, the radiologists should pay more attention to the diagnosis of PVST, especially CSPVST.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Missed diagnosis rate of portal venous system thrombosis in cirrhosis on contrast-enhanced CT scans: Review of radiology reports from a tertiary hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Siqi Jia, Huiyuan Lu, Ting Wang, Wenhui Huo, Zhuang Liu, Yueying Shi, Libo Zhang, Xingshun Qi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11739-025-04076-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Portal venous system thrombosis (PVST) negatively influences the outcomes of cirrhotic patients. Its accurate diagnosis is essential for treatment selection and prognostic assessment, but it is usually missed in clinical practice. Overall, 684 contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) scans were performed in cirrhotic patients who were consecutively admitted from January 2015 to June 2023, and were retrospectively reviewed by two independent researchers. Weighted-kappa was calculated to estimate the consistency of the two researchers in the diagnosis of PVST. If their conclusions were inconsistent, a senior researcher would be invited to make a final diagnosis. Clinically significant PVST (CSPVST) was further identified. By comparing the researchers' diagnosis with the radiology reports, the missed diagnosis rate of PVST was calculated. The Kappa coefficient was 0.85, indicating almost perfect consistency in the diagnosis of PVST between the two researchers. In total, PVST was diagnosed by the researchers on 278 (40.64%) of the 684 scans; and among them, a diagnosis of PVST was not recorded in 168 radiology reports. Thus, the missed diagnosis rate of PVST was 60.43% (168/278). CSPVST was diagnosed by the researchers on 87 (12.72%) scans; and among them, a diagnosis of PVST was not recorded in 38 radiology reports. Thus, the missed diagnosis rate of CSPVST was 43.68% (38/87). If a diagnosis of PVST was made only according to the radiology reports, a very high proportion of PVST would be missed. Considering a high rate of PVST detection in cirrhosis, the radiologists should pay more attention to the diagnosis of PVST, especially CSPVST.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal and Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal and Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-04076-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-04076-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Missed diagnosis rate of portal venous system thrombosis in cirrhosis on contrast-enhanced CT scans: Review of radiology reports from a tertiary hospital.
Portal venous system thrombosis (PVST) negatively influences the outcomes of cirrhotic patients. Its accurate diagnosis is essential for treatment selection and prognostic assessment, but it is usually missed in clinical practice. Overall, 684 contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) scans were performed in cirrhotic patients who were consecutively admitted from January 2015 to June 2023, and were retrospectively reviewed by two independent researchers. Weighted-kappa was calculated to estimate the consistency of the two researchers in the diagnosis of PVST. If their conclusions were inconsistent, a senior researcher would be invited to make a final diagnosis. Clinically significant PVST (CSPVST) was further identified. By comparing the researchers' diagnosis with the radiology reports, the missed diagnosis rate of PVST was calculated. The Kappa coefficient was 0.85, indicating almost perfect consistency in the diagnosis of PVST between the two researchers. In total, PVST was diagnosed by the researchers on 278 (40.64%) of the 684 scans; and among them, a diagnosis of PVST was not recorded in 168 radiology reports. Thus, the missed diagnosis rate of PVST was 60.43% (168/278). CSPVST was diagnosed by the researchers on 87 (12.72%) scans; and among them, a diagnosis of PVST was not recorded in 38 radiology reports. Thus, the missed diagnosis rate of CSPVST was 43.68% (38/87). If a diagnosis of PVST was made only according to the radiology reports, a very high proportion of PVST would be missed. Considering a high rate of PVST detection in cirrhosis, the radiologists should pay more attention to the diagnosis of PVST, especially CSPVST.
期刊介绍:
Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.