肝硬化门静脉系统血栓CT增强扫描的漏诊率:某三级医院影像学报告回顾。

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Siqi Jia, Huiyuan Lu, Ting Wang, Wenhui Huo, Zhuang Liu, Yueying Shi, Libo Zhang, Xingshun Qi
{"title":"肝硬化门静脉系统血栓CT增强扫描的漏诊率:某三级医院影像学报告回顾。","authors":"Siqi Jia, Huiyuan Lu, Ting Wang, Wenhui Huo, Zhuang Liu, Yueying Shi, Libo Zhang, Xingshun Qi","doi":"10.1007/s11739-025-04076-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Portal venous system thrombosis (PVST) negatively influences the outcomes of cirrhotic patients. Its accurate diagnosis is essential for treatment selection and prognostic assessment, but it is usually missed in clinical practice. Overall, 684 contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) scans were performed in cirrhotic patients who were consecutively admitted from January 2015 to June 2023, and were retrospectively reviewed by two independent researchers. Weighted-kappa was calculated to estimate the consistency of the two researchers in the diagnosis of PVST. If their conclusions were inconsistent, a senior researcher would be invited to make a final diagnosis. Clinically significant PVST (CSPVST) was further identified. By comparing the researchers' diagnosis with the radiology reports, the missed diagnosis rate of PVST was calculated. The Kappa coefficient was 0.85, indicating almost perfect consistency in the diagnosis of PVST between the two researchers. In total, PVST was diagnosed by the researchers on 278 (40.64%) of the 684 scans; and among them, a diagnosis of PVST was not recorded in 168 radiology reports. Thus, the missed diagnosis rate of PVST was 60.43% (168/278). CSPVST was diagnosed by the researchers on 87 (12.72%) scans; and among them, a diagnosis of PVST was not recorded in 38 radiology reports. Thus, the missed diagnosis rate of CSPVST was 43.68% (38/87). If a diagnosis of PVST was made only according to the radiology reports, a very high proportion of PVST would be missed. Considering a high rate of PVST detection in cirrhosis, the radiologists should pay more attention to the diagnosis of PVST, especially CSPVST.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Missed diagnosis rate of portal venous system thrombosis in cirrhosis on contrast-enhanced CT scans: Review of radiology reports from a tertiary hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Siqi Jia, Huiyuan Lu, Ting Wang, Wenhui Huo, Zhuang Liu, Yueying Shi, Libo Zhang, Xingshun Qi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11739-025-04076-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Portal venous system thrombosis (PVST) negatively influences the outcomes of cirrhotic patients. Its accurate diagnosis is essential for treatment selection and prognostic assessment, but it is usually missed in clinical practice. Overall, 684 contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) scans were performed in cirrhotic patients who were consecutively admitted from January 2015 to June 2023, and were retrospectively reviewed by two independent researchers. Weighted-kappa was calculated to estimate the consistency of the two researchers in the diagnosis of PVST. If their conclusions were inconsistent, a senior researcher would be invited to make a final diagnosis. Clinically significant PVST (CSPVST) was further identified. By comparing the researchers' diagnosis with the radiology reports, the missed diagnosis rate of PVST was calculated. The Kappa coefficient was 0.85, indicating almost perfect consistency in the diagnosis of PVST between the two researchers. In total, PVST was diagnosed by the researchers on 278 (40.64%) of the 684 scans; and among them, a diagnosis of PVST was not recorded in 168 radiology reports. Thus, the missed diagnosis rate of PVST was 60.43% (168/278). CSPVST was diagnosed by the researchers on 87 (12.72%) scans; and among them, a diagnosis of PVST was not recorded in 38 radiology reports. Thus, the missed diagnosis rate of CSPVST was 43.68% (38/87). If a diagnosis of PVST was made only according to the radiology reports, a very high proportion of PVST would be missed. Considering a high rate of PVST detection in cirrhosis, the radiologists should pay more attention to the diagnosis of PVST, especially CSPVST.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal and Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal and Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-04076-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-04076-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

门静脉系统血栓形成(PVST)对肝硬化患者的预后有负面影响。它的准确诊断对治疗选择和预后评估至关重要,但在临床实践中往往被忽视。总体而言,在2015年1月至2023年6月期间连续入院的肝硬化患者中进行了684次对比增强计算机断层扫描(CE-CT),并由两位独立研究人员进行回顾性研究。计算加权kappa来估计两位研究者对PVST诊断的一致性。如果他们的结论不一致,将邀请一位高级研究员做出最终诊断。进一步确定有临床意义的PVST (CSPVST)。将研究者的诊断与影像学报告进行比较,计算PVST的漏诊率。Kappa系数为0.85,表明两位研究者对PVST的诊断几乎完全一致。总共684次扫描中,研究人员诊断出PVST的次数为278次(40.64%);其中,168例放射学报告未记录PVST诊断。PVST的漏诊率为60.43%(168/278)。研究人员在87次(12.72%)扫描中诊断出CSPVST;其中38例放射学报告未记录PVST诊断。CSPVST的漏诊率为43.68%(38/87)。如果仅根据影像学报告诊断PVST,将会有很大比例的PVST漏诊。鉴于肝硬化中PVST检出率较高,放射科医师应重视PVST的诊断,尤其是CSPVST。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Missed diagnosis rate of portal venous system thrombosis in cirrhosis on contrast-enhanced CT scans: Review of radiology reports from a tertiary hospital.

Portal venous system thrombosis (PVST) negatively influences the outcomes of cirrhotic patients. Its accurate diagnosis is essential for treatment selection and prognostic assessment, but it is usually missed in clinical practice. Overall, 684 contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) scans were performed in cirrhotic patients who were consecutively admitted from January 2015 to June 2023, and were retrospectively reviewed by two independent researchers. Weighted-kappa was calculated to estimate the consistency of the two researchers in the diagnosis of PVST. If their conclusions were inconsistent, a senior researcher would be invited to make a final diagnosis. Clinically significant PVST (CSPVST) was further identified. By comparing the researchers' diagnosis with the radiology reports, the missed diagnosis rate of PVST was calculated. The Kappa coefficient was 0.85, indicating almost perfect consistency in the diagnosis of PVST between the two researchers. In total, PVST was diagnosed by the researchers on 278 (40.64%) of the 684 scans; and among them, a diagnosis of PVST was not recorded in 168 radiology reports. Thus, the missed diagnosis rate of PVST was 60.43% (168/278). CSPVST was diagnosed by the researchers on 87 (12.72%) scans; and among them, a diagnosis of PVST was not recorded in 38 radiology reports. Thus, the missed diagnosis rate of CSPVST was 43.68% (38/87). If a diagnosis of PVST was made only according to the radiology reports, a very high proportion of PVST would be missed. Considering a high rate of PVST detection in cirrhosis, the radiologists should pay more attention to the diagnosis of PVST, especially CSPVST.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Internal and Emergency Medicine
Internal and Emergency Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
258
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信