美国部落附属注射器服务项目:简要报告。

IF 4 2区 社会学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Sean T Allen, Edmund Keane, Clinton Alexander, Sharon Day, Philomena Kebec, Andrea Medley, Frank Johnson, Pam Hughes, Brooklynn Barney, Melissa Walls
{"title":"美国部落附属注射器服务项目:简要报告。","authors":"Sean T Allen, Edmund Keane, Clinton Alexander, Sharon Day, Philomena Kebec, Andrea Medley, Frank Johnson, Pam Hughes, Brooklynn Barney, Melissa Walls","doi":"10.1186/s12954-025-01296-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few studies have examined the implementation of syringe services programs (SSPs) that serve Indigenous people who inject drugs in the United States (US). There are 574 Federally-recognized tribes in the US, each characterized by unique traditions, values, and customs. Given the diversity of tribes, better understanding SSP implementation in Native contexts first requires examining the degree to which tribes in the US implemented these programs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This research describes the number of SSPs that are affiliated with Federally-recognized tribes in the US.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From July to September 2022, we conducted an online search of all 574 Federally-recognized tribes to determine how many had affiliated SSPs. We downloaded a list of Federally-recognized tribes from the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and conducted Boolean searches on Google for the name of each tribe and SSPs. Our searches included several synonyms for SSPs, including \"needle exchange,\" \"syringe exchange,\" and \"harm reduction.\" In instances where \"harm reduction programs\" were identified, we reviewed website contents to determine if the program was inclusive of a SSP. We considered SSPs to be affiliated with Federally-recognized tribe(s) if they were housed in a tribal health clinic or tribal organization, or via an explicit partnership with a Federally-recognized tribe.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 21 SSPs that were affiliated with Federally-recognized tribes. The majority (85.7%) of SSPs were affiliated with a single tribe. Eight of the SSPs also offered medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) on-site (e.g., the SSPs operated out of health clinics that offered MOUD).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study demonstrate that there are at least 21 SSPs that are affiliated with Federally-recognized tribes in the US, with some serving multiple tribes. This research makes a noteworthy contribution to the public health literature given that no systematic exploration of the number of SSPs affiliated with tribes has been conducted. The scale of substance use inequities among Indigenous people underscores the critical importance of communities implementing and managing their own comprehensive harm reduction programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12922,"journal":{"name":"Harm Reduction Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"143"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12362947/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tribally-affiliated syringe services programs in the United States: a brief report.\",\"authors\":\"Sean T Allen, Edmund Keane, Clinton Alexander, Sharon Day, Philomena Kebec, Andrea Medley, Frank Johnson, Pam Hughes, Brooklynn Barney, Melissa Walls\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12954-025-01296-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few studies have examined the implementation of syringe services programs (SSPs) that serve Indigenous people who inject drugs in the United States (US). There are 574 Federally-recognized tribes in the US, each characterized by unique traditions, values, and customs. Given the diversity of tribes, better understanding SSP implementation in Native contexts first requires examining the degree to which tribes in the US implemented these programs.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This research describes the number of SSPs that are affiliated with Federally-recognized tribes in the US.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From July to September 2022, we conducted an online search of all 574 Federally-recognized tribes to determine how many had affiliated SSPs. We downloaded a list of Federally-recognized tribes from the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and conducted Boolean searches on Google for the name of each tribe and SSPs. Our searches included several synonyms for SSPs, including \\\"needle exchange,\\\" \\\"syringe exchange,\\\" and \\\"harm reduction.\\\" In instances where \\\"harm reduction programs\\\" were identified, we reviewed website contents to determine if the program was inclusive of a SSP. We considered SSPs to be affiliated with Federally-recognized tribe(s) if they were housed in a tribal health clinic or tribal organization, or via an explicit partnership with a Federally-recognized tribe.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 21 SSPs that were affiliated with Federally-recognized tribes. The majority (85.7%) of SSPs were affiliated with a single tribe. Eight of the SSPs also offered medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) on-site (e.g., the SSPs operated out of health clinics that offered MOUD).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study demonstrate that there are at least 21 SSPs that are affiliated with Federally-recognized tribes in the US, with some serving multiple tribes. This research makes a noteworthy contribution to the public health literature given that no systematic exploration of the number of SSPs affiliated with tribes has been conducted. The scale of substance use inequities among Indigenous people underscores the critical importance of communities implementing and managing their own comprehensive harm reduction programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harm Reduction Journal\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12362947/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harm Reduction Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-025-01296-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harm Reduction Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-025-01296-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在美国,很少有研究调查了为注射毒品的土著人提供服务的注射器服务项目(ssp)的实施情况。美国有574个联邦承认的部落,每个部落都有独特的传统、价值观和习俗。考虑到部落的多样性,更好地理解本地环境下SSP的实施首先需要检查美国部落实施这些计划的程度。目的:本研究描述了隶属于联邦承认的部落在美国ssp的数量。方法:从2022年7月到9月,我们对所有574个联邦承认的部落进行了在线搜索,以确定有多少部落有附属的ssp。我们从印第安事务局(BIA)下载了一份联邦承认的部落名单,并在谷歌上进行了布尔搜索,以查找每个部落和ssp的名称。我们的搜索包括几个ssp的同义词,包括“针头交换”、“注射器交换”和“减少危害”。在确定了“减少伤害计划”的情况下,我们审查了网站内容,以确定该计划是否包括SSP。如果ssp被安置在部落诊所或部落组织中,或者与联邦承认的部落有明确的合作关系,我们认为ssp隶属于联邦承认的部落。结果:我们确定了21个隶属于联邦承认的部落的ssp。大多数ssp(85.7%)隶属于单一部落。8个特别服务提供者还在现场提供治疗阿片类药物使用障碍的药物(例如,特别服务提供者在提供阿片类药物使用障碍的保健诊所外运作)。结论:本研究结果表明,在美国至少有21个ssp隶属于联邦认可的部落,其中一些服务于多个部落。这项研究对公共卫生文献做出了值得注意的贡献,因为没有对隶属于部落的ssp的数量进行系统的探索。土著人民药物使用不平等的程度凸显了社区实施和管理其自身的综合减少危害方案的极端重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tribally-affiliated syringe services programs in the United States: a brief report.

Background: Few studies have examined the implementation of syringe services programs (SSPs) that serve Indigenous people who inject drugs in the United States (US). There are 574 Federally-recognized tribes in the US, each characterized by unique traditions, values, and customs. Given the diversity of tribes, better understanding SSP implementation in Native contexts first requires examining the degree to which tribes in the US implemented these programs.

Objective: This research describes the number of SSPs that are affiliated with Federally-recognized tribes in the US.

Methods: From July to September 2022, we conducted an online search of all 574 Federally-recognized tribes to determine how many had affiliated SSPs. We downloaded a list of Federally-recognized tribes from the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and conducted Boolean searches on Google for the name of each tribe and SSPs. Our searches included several synonyms for SSPs, including "needle exchange," "syringe exchange," and "harm reduction." In instances where "harm reduction programs" were identified, we reviewed website contents to determine if the program was inclusive of a SSP. We considered SSPs to be affiliated with Federally-recognized tribe(s) if they were housed in a tribal health clinic or tribal organization, or via an explicit partnership with a Federally-recognized tribe.

Results: We identified 21 SSPs that were affiliated with Federally-recognized tribes. The majority (85.7%) of SSPs were affiliated with a single tribe. Eight of the SSPs also offered medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) on-site (e.g., the SSPs operated out of health clinics that offered MOUD).

Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate that there are at least 21 SSPs that are affiliated with Federally-recognized tribes in the US, with some serving multiple tribes. This research makes a noteworthy contribution to the public health literature given that no systematic exploration of the number of SSPs affiliated with tribes has been conducted. The scale of substance use inequities among Indigenous people underscores the critical importance of communities implementing and managing their own comprehensive harm reduction programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Harm Reduction Journal
Harm Reduction Journal Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
126
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Harm Reduction Journal is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal whose focus is on the prevalent patterns of psychoactive drug use, the public policies meant to control them, and the search for effective methods of reducing the adverse medical, public health, and social consequences associated with both drugs and drug policies. We define "harm reduction" as "policies and programs which aim to reduce the health, social, and economic costs of legal and illegal psychoactive drug use without necessarily reducing drug consumption". We are especially interested in studies of the evolving patterns of drug use around the world, their implications for the spread of HIV/AIDS and other blood-borne pathogens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信