Kai Michael Schubert, Anthony G Marson, Eugen Trinka, Marian Galovic
{"title":"癫痫作为一种动态疾病:走向可操作的、个体化的癫痫发作风险预测。","authors":"Kai Michael Schubert, Anthony G Marson, Eugen Trinka, Marian Galovic","doi":"10.1111/epi.18602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current definition of epilepsy allows diagnosis after a single unprovoked seizure if the estimated 10-year recurrence risk is ≥60%. While this framework is grounded in epidemiological evidence, it does not align with the shorter time horizons that guide many clinical and personal decisions. In acquired epilepsies, such as those following stroke, traumatic brain injury, or CNS infections, most recurrences occur within 1-2 years, with risk declining sharply thereafter. This temporal clustering challenges the use of static, long-term risk thresholds in isolation. Dynamic tools, such as the Chance of an Occurrence of a Seizure in the Next Year (COSY) and validated prognostic models (e.g., SeLECT, CAVE, RISE), offer recalculable, near-term estimates that reflect evolving patient status. These metrics can improve communication, inform treatment thresholds through Number Needed to Treat (NNT) calculations, and enhance clinical trial recruitment by targeting periods of highest risk. However, barriers remain, including limited integration into guidelines, gaps in external validation, and the \"Oedipus effect,\" where probabilistic predictions influence patient behavior, treatment decisions, and research outcomes. Incorporating individualized, time-sensitive risk prediction into clinical frameworks may better align diagnostic definitions with patient needs, reduce overtreatment, and optimize both everyday care and research in epilepsy prevention and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epilepsy as a dynamic disease: Toward actionable, individualized seizure risk prediction.\",\"authors\":\"Kai Michael Schubert, Anthony G Marson, Eugen Trinka, Marian Galovic\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/epi.18602\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The current definition of epilepsy allows diagnosis after a single unprovoked seizure if the estimated 10-year recurrence risk is ≥60%. While this framework is grounded in epidemiological evidence, it does not align with the shorter time horizons that guide many clinical and personal decisions. In acquired epilepsies, such as those following stroke, traumatic brain injury, or CNS infections, most recurrences occur within 1-2 years, with risk declining sharply thereafter. This temporal clustering challenges the use of static, long-term risk thresholds in isolation. Dynamic tools, such as the Chance of an Occurrence of a Seizure in the Next Year (COSY) and validated prognostic models (e.g., SeLECT, CAVE, RISE), offer recalculable, near-term estimates that reflect evolving patient status. These metrics can improve communication, inform treatment thresholds through Number Needed to Treat (NNT) calculations, and enhance clinical trial recruitment by targeting periods of highest risk. However, barriers remain, including limited integration into guidelines, gaps in external validation, and the \\\"Oedipus effect,\\\" where probabilistic predictions influence patient behavior, treatment decisions, and research outcomes. Incorporating individualized, time-sensitive risk prediction into clinical frameworks may better align diagnostic definitions with patient needs, reduce overtreatment, and optimize both everyday care and research in epilepsy prevention and management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18602\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18602","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Epilepsy as a dynamic disease: Toward actionable, individualized seizure risk prediction.
The current definition of epilepsy allows diagnosis after a single unprovoked seizure if the estimated 10-year recurrence risk is ≥60%. While this framework is grounded in epidemiological evidence, it does not align with the shorter time horizons that guide many clinical and personal decisions. In acquired epilepsies, such as those following stroke, traumatic brain injury, or CNS infections, most recurrences occur within 1-2 years, with risk declining sharply thereafter. This temporal clustering challenges the use of static, long-term risk thresholds in isolation. Dynamic tools, such as the Chance of an Occurrence of a Seizure in the Next Year (COSY) and validated prognostic models (e.g., SeLECT, CAVE, RISE), offer recalculable, near-term estimates that reflect evolving patient status. These metrics can improve communication, inform treatment thresholds through Number Needed to Treat (NNT) calculations, and enhance clinical trial recruitment by targeting periods of highest risk. However, barriers remain, including limited integration into guidelines, gaps in external validation, and the "Oedipus effect," where probabilistic predictions influence patient behavior, treatment decisions, and research outcomes. Incorporating individualized, time-sensitive risk prediction into clinical frameworks may better align diagnostic definitions with patient needs, reduce overtreatment, and optimize both everyday care and research in epilepsy prevention and management.
期刊介绍:
Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.