患者和医疗保健专业人员对间质性肺病远程医疗的看法。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Chronic Respiratory Disease Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-17 DOI:10.1177/14799731251366945
Sheetal Deshpande, Gabriella Tikellis, Hayley Barnes, Karen Symons, Anne E Holland, Ian Glaspole, Yet Hong Khor
{"title":"患者和医疗保健专业人员对间质性肺病远程医疗的看法。","authors":"Sheetal Deshpande, Gabriella Tikellis, Hayley Barnes, Karen Symons, Anne E Holland, Ian Glaspole, Yet Hong Khor","doi":"10.1177/14799731251366945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundWhile telehealth has been used for specialist care during the COVID-19 pandemic, its benefits and barriers to use for delivering care in interstitial lung disease (ILD) remain unclear. We aimed to explore perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) towards telehealth use in ILD.MethodThis qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was undertaken in 18 patients with ILD from a single quaternary ILD centre and 18 HCPs of four different disciplines from various ILD centres around Australia. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded by two investigators independently using thematic analysis. Themes were developed by consensus.ResultsPatients and HCPs had experienced telehealth via video and telephone, predominantly for teleconsultation and/or telerehabilitation. For patients, benefits included provision of ongoing access to healthcare and significant reduction in travel. Healthcare professionals reported teleconsultations played an important role in patient follow-up rather than at initial contact. Concerns of suboptimal rapport and communication and a lack of physical examination were raised by both groups. Individual patient suitability, improvement in technological platform and support, and improved workflow for clinicians were important factors for utilisation of telehealth. Patients were open to the use of home monitoring devices, however, HCPs felt further research was required prior to clinical implementation.ConclusionThis study highlights positive and negative experiences of telehealth for patients and HCPs in the management of ILD . It also identifies areas for improvement to create a tailored telehealth model for ILD care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"22 ","pages":"14799731251366945"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12361724/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient and healthcare professional perspectives on telehealth in the care of interstitial lung disease.\",\"authors\":\"Sheetal Deshpande, Gabriella Tikellis, Hayley Barnes, Karen Symons, Anne E Holland, Ian Glaspole, Yet Hong Khor\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14799731251366945\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundWhile telehealth has been used for specialist care during the COVID-19 pandemic, its benefits and barriers to use for delivering care in interstitial lung disease (ILD) remain unclear. We aimed to explore perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) towards telehealth use in ILD.MethodThis qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was undertaken in 18 patients with ILD from a single quaternary ILD centre and 18 HCPs of four different disciplines from various ILD centres around Australia. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded by two investigators independently using thematic analysis. Themes were developed by consensus.ResultsPatients and HCPs had experienced telehealth via video and telephone, predominantly for teleconsultation and/or telerehabilitation. For patients, benefits included provision of ongoing access to healthcare and significant reduction in travel. Healthcare professionals reported teleconsultations played an important role in patient follow-up rather than at initial contact. Concerns of suboptimal rapport and communication and a lack of physical examination were raised by both groups. Individual patient suitability, improvement in technological platform and support, and improved workflow for clinicians were important factors for utilisation of telehealth. Patients were open to the use of home monitoring devices, however, HCPs felt further research was required prior to clinical implementation.ConclusionThis study highlights positive and negative experiences of telehealth for patients and HCPs in the management of ILD . It also identifies areas for improvement to create a tailored telehealth model for ILD care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chronic Respiratory Disease\",\"volume\":\"22 \",\"pages\":\"14799731251366945\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12361724/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chronic Respiratory Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14799731251366945\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14799731251366945","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,远程医疗已被用于专科护理,但其用于提供间质性肺疾病(ILD)护理的益处和障碍仍不清楚。我们的目的是探讨患者和医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)对ILD远程医疗使用的看法。方法采用半结构化访谈的定性研究方法,对来自澳大利亚各个ILD中心的18名ILD患者和来自四个不同学科的18名HCPs进行了研究。访谈由两名调查人员逐字记录,并使用主题分析独立编码。主题是通过协商一致制定的。结果患者和医务人员通过视频和电话进行远程医疗,以远程会诊和/或远程康复为主。对患者而言,福利包括提供持续的医疗保健和大大减少旅行。医疗保健专业人员报告,远程咨询在患者随访中发挥了重要作用,而不是在初次接触中。两组都提出了不理想的关系和沟通以及缺乏身体检查的担忧。个别患者的适用性、技术平台和支持的改进以及临床医生工作流程的改进是利用远程保健的重要因素。患者对使用家庭监测设备持开放态度,然而,HCPs认为在临床实施之前需要进一步研究。结论本研究突出了远程医疗对ILD患者和医护人员的正面和负面影响。它还确定了需要改进的领域,以创建适合ILD护理的远程医疗模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Patient and healthcare professional perspectives on telehealth in the care of interstitial lung disease.

Patient and healthcare professional perspectives on telehealth in the care of interstitial lung disease.

Patient and healthcare professional perspectives on telehealth in the care of interstitial lung disease.

Patient and healthcare professional perspectives on telehealth in the care of interstitial lung disease.

BackgroundWhile telehealth has been used for specialist care during the COVID-19 pandemic, its benefits and barriers to use for delivering care in interstitial lung disease (ILD) remain unclear. We aimed to explore perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) towards telehealth use in ILD.MethodThis qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was undertaken in 18 patients with ILD from a single quaternary ILD centre and 18 HCPs of four different disciplines from various ILD centres around Australia. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded by two investigators independently using thematic analysis. Themes were developed by consensus.ResultsPatients and HCPs had experienced telehealth via video and telephone, predominantly for teleconsultation and/or telerehabilitation. For patients, benefits included provision of ongoing access to healthcare and significant reduction in travel. Healthcare professionals reported teleconsultations played an important role in patient follow-up rather than at initial contact. Concerns of suboptimal rapport and communication and a lack of physical examination were raised by both groups. Individual patient suitability, improvement in technological platform and support, and improved workflow for clinicians were important factors for utilisation of telehealth. Patients were open to the use of home monitoring devices, however, HCPs felt further research was required prior to clinical implementation.ConclusionThis study highlights positive and negative experiences of telehealth for patients and HCPs in the management of ILD . It also identifies areas for improvement to create a tailored telehealth model for ILD care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chronic Respiratory Disease
Chronic Respiratory Disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Chronic Respiratory Disease is a peer-reviewed, open access, scholarly journal, created in response to the rising incidence of chronic respiratory diseases worldwide. It publishes high quality research papers and original articles that have immediate relevance to clinical practice and its multi-disciplinary perspective reflects the nature of modern treatment. The journal provides a high quality, multi-disciplinary focus for the publication of original papers, reviews and commentary in the broad area of chronic respiratory disease, particularly its treatment and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信