结合电子健康记录和急诊筛查措施的老年人跌倒风险评分的发展

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Brian Suffoletto, Micaela Steube, Waverly Mayer, Caitlin Toth, Nick Ashenburg, Michelle Lin, Michael Losak
{"title":"结合电子健康记录和急诊筛查措施的老年人跌倒风险评分的发展","authors":"Brian Suffoletto, Micaela Steube, Waverly Mayer, Caitlin Toth, Nick Ashenburg, Michelle Lin, Michael Losak","doi":"10.1111/acem.70121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older adults have high rates of falls after Emergency Department (ED) discharge; yet existing screening tools either underperform or are too difficult to deploy. This study aimed to evaluate a parsimonious predictive model for falls within 6 months post-ED discharge, utilizing both typical electronic health record (EHR) data and brief ED-based screenings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective cohort study from September 2023 to May 2024, 412 community-dwelling adults aged ≥ 60 years who ambulate without assistance were enrolled during ED visits. Baseline data included EHR-derived variables (e.g., comorbidities, medication use) and ED screens (e.g., living situation, fall history). Participants were followed for 6 months to document fall occurrences. Multivariable LASSO logistic regression models to predict any fall were then constructed: Model 1 (EHR), Model 2 (ED screens), and Model 3 (combined). Model performance was evaluated using discrimination and calibration metrics, including area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 356 participants with complete follow-up, 104 (29.2%) experienced at least one fall. Model 3 demonstrated superior predictive performance (AUC = 0.75) compared to Model 1 (AUC = 0.67) and Model 2 (AUC = 0.71). Significant predictors in the combined model included anemia (OR = 3.19), use of oral hypoglycemics (OR = 2.26), living with less than two other people (OR = 3.79), infrequently leaving home (OR = 1.97), and a history of ≥ 3 falls in the prior 6 months (OR = 12.11). A risk score made up of 9 items (6 EHR; 3 ED screen) categorizing participants as high risk (score 6-25) or low risk (score 0-5) resulted in sensitivity = 64%, specificity = 75%, positive likelihood ratio = 2.54, and negative likelihood ratio = 0.49.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integrating EHR data with brief ED-based screenings enhances the prediction of fall risk among older adults post-ED discharge. The developed risk score effectively stratifies patients into low versus high risk, facilitating targeted prevention interventions. Further validation in independent cohorts is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a Fall Risk Score for Older Adults Incorporating Electronic Health Record and Emergency Department Screening Measures.\",\"authors\":\"Brian Suffoletto, Micaela Steube, Waverly Mayer, Caitlin Toth, Nick Ashenburg, Michelle Lin, Michael Losak\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/acem.70121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older adults have high rates of falls after Emergency Department (ED) discharge; yet existing screening tools either underperform or are too difficult to deploy. This study aimed to evaluate a parsimonious predictive model for falls within 6 months post-ED discharge, utilizing both typical electronic health record (EHR) data and brief ED-based screenings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective cohort study from September 2023 to May 2024, 412 community-dwelling adults aged ≥ 60 years who ambulate without assistance were enrolled during ED visits. Baseline data included EHR-derived variables (e.g., comorbidities, medication use) and ED screens (e.g., living situation, fall history). Participants were followed for 6 months to document fall occurrences. Multivariable LASSO logistic regression models to predict any fall were then constructed: Model 1 (EHR), Model 2 (ED screens), and Model 3 (combined). Model performance was evaluated using discrimination and calibration metrics, including area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 356 participants with complete follow-up, 104 (29.2%) experienced at least one fall. Model 3 demonstrated superior predictive performance (AUC = 0.75) compared to Model 1 (AUC = 0.67) and Model 2 (AUC = 0.71). Significant predictors in the combined model included anemia (OR = 3.19), use of oral hypoglycemics (OR = 2.26), living with less than two other people (OR = 3.79), infrequently leaving home (OR = 1.97), and a history of ≥ 3 falls in the prior 6 months (OR = 12.11). A risk score made up of 9 items (6 EHR; 3 ED screen) categorizing participants as high risk (score 6-25) or low risk (score 0-5) resulted in sensitivity = 64%, specificity = 75%, positive likelihood ratio = 2.54, and negative likelihood ratio = 0.49.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Integrating EHR data with brief ED-based screenings enhances the prediction of fall risk among older adults post-ED discharge. The developed risk score effectively stratifies patients into low versus high risk, facilitating targeted prevention interventions. Further validation in independent cohorts is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.70121\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.70121","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:老年人在急诊科(ED)出院后跌倒的发生率很高;然而,现有的筛选工具要么表现不佳,要么难以部署。本研究旨在利用典型的电子健康记录(EHR)数据和基于ed的简短筛查,评估ed出院后6个月内跌倒的简约预测模型。方法:在一项前瞻性队列研究中,从2023年9月至2024年5月,412名≥60岁的社区居民在ED就诊期间没有辅助行走。基线数据包括ehr衍生变量(如合并症、药物使用)和ED筛查(如生活状况、跌倒史)。参与者被跟踪了6个月,以记录跌倒的发生情况。然后构建多变量LASSO逻辑回归模型来预测任何跌倒:模型1 (EHR),模型2 (ED屏幕)和模型3(组合)。使用判别和校准指标评估模型性能,包括接收器工作特性(AUC)曲线下面积。结果:在356名完全随访的参与者中,104名(29.2%)经历了至少一次跌倒。与模型1 (AUC = 0.67)和模型2 (AUC = 0.71)相比,模型3表现出更好的预测性能(AUC = 0.75)。联合模型的显著预测因子包括贫血(OR = 3.19)、使用口服降糖药(OR = 2.26)、与少于2人一起生活(OR = 3.79)、很少离开家(OR = 1.97)以及在过去6个月内跌倒3次以上(OR = 12.11)。风险评分由9个项目(6个EHR, 3个ED屏幕)组成,将参与者分为高风险(6 -25分)或低风险(0-5分),结果敏感性= 64%,特异性= 75%,阳性似然比= 2.54,阴性似然比= 0.49。结论:将EHR数据与基于ed的简短筛查相结合,可以增强对老年人ed出院后跌倒风险的预测。开发的风险评分有效地将患者分为低风险和高风险,促进有针对性的预防干预。需要在独立队列中进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a Fall Risk Score for Older Adults Incorporating Electronic Health Record and Emergency Department Screening Measures.

Background: Older adults have high rates of falls after Emergency Department (ED) discharge; yet existing screening tools either underperform or are too difficult to deploy. This study aimed to evaluate a parsimonious predictive model for falls within 6 months post-ED discharge, utilizing both typical electronic health record (EHR) data and brief ED-based screenings.

Methods: In a prospective cohort study from September 2023 to May 2024, 412 community-dwelling adults aged ≥ 60 years who ambulate without assistance were enrolled during ED visits. Baseline data included EHR-derived variables (e.g., comorbidities, medication use) and ED screens (e.g., living situation, fall history). Participants were followed for 6 months to document fall occurrences. Multivariable LASSO logistic regression models to predict any fall were then constructed: Model 1 (EHR), Model 2 (ED screens), and Model 3 (combined). Model performance was evaluated using discrimination and calibration metrics, including area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curves.

Results: Of the 356 participants with complete follow-up, 104 (29.2%) experienced at least one fall. Model 3 demonstrated superior predictive performance (AUC = 0.75) compared to Model 1 (AUC = 0.67) and Model 2 (AUC = 0.71). Significant predictors in the combined model included anemia (OR = 3.19), use of oral hypoglycemics (OR = 2.26), living with less than two other people (OR = 3.79), infrequently leaving home (OR = 1.97), and a history of ≥ 3 falls in the prior 6 months (OR = 12.11). A risk score made up of 9 items (6 EHR; 3 ED screen) categorizing participants as high risk (score 6-25) or low risk (score 0-5) resulted in sensitivity = 64%, specificity = 75%, positive likelihood ratio = 2.54, and negative likelihood ratio = 0.49.

Conclusions: Integrating EHR data with brief ED-based screenings enhances the prediction of fall risk among older adults post-ED discharge. The developed risk score effectively stratifies patients into low versus high risk, facilitating targeted prevention interventions. Further validation in independent cohorts is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine. The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more. Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信