William M. Brandon, Alan Jacob, Colin Dunn, Song Zhang, Ang Gao, Fernando Torres, Adrian Lawrence, Irina Timofte, Srinivas Bollineni, Manish Mohanka, Juan Deleija-Lujano, Adnan Khan, Joseph Crossno, Michael Wait, Matthias Peltz, Christopher Heid, Lynn Huffman, Steve Ring, John Murala, Suresh Keshavamurthy, Alex Jaye Weston, Vaidehi Kaza
{"title":"社区痛苦与肺移植等待名单接受的关联","authors":"William M. Brandon, Alan Jacob, Colin Dunn, Song Zhang, Ang Gao, Fernando Torres, Adrian Lawrence, Irina Timofte, Srinivas Bollineni, Manish Mohanka, Juan Deleija-Lujano, Adnan Khan, Joseph Crossno, Michael Wait, Matthias Peltz, Christopher Heid, Lynn Huffman, Steve Ring, John Murala, Suresh Keshavamurthy, Alex Jaye Weston, Vaidehi Kaza","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Access to transplantation is not entirely equitable with several studies demonstrating racial and socioeconomic disparities affecting the transplant process and thereby outcomes. Notably, few studies have focused on disparities prior to waitlisting. This study aimed to characterize the impact of community socioeconomic factors as measured by the Distressed Community Index (DCI) on acceptance for lung transplant waitlisting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective review was performed on 463 patients evaluated for lung transplant waitlisting at our institution between 2016 and 2020. Community distress was calculated using the DCI, which yields a composite Distress Index (cDI) and includes data on various community characteristics. Statistical analysis was done using descriptive statistics and logistic regression methods.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the 463 patients included, 333 (71.9%) were accepted and 130 (28.1%) were denied for waitlisting. The mean cDI was 42.5 (±30.0) and 44.8 (±30.8) (<i>p</i> = 0.45) for the accepted and declined groups, respectively, indicating mid-tier distress for both groups by DCI metrics. The cDI was not found to be associated with odds of waitlist acceptance (OR 0.997, CI 0.99–1.004, <i>p</i> = 0.455). Furthermore, there was no association between sex, race, ethnicity, public insurance coverage, or any of the subcomponents of the DCI and the odds of successful waitlisting at our institution.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This single-center retrospective evaluation found that cDI, as calculated by the DCI, and the DCI subcomponents were not associated with transplant waitlist acceptance. Future studies should be done evaluating community-level socioeconomic disparities and the utility of community disadvantage indexing tools in the lung transplant waitlisting process, with the intentions of conceptually expanding our understanding of the link between transplant outcomes and biopsychosocial candidacy.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"39 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ctr.70289","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Community Distress With Lung Transplant Waitlist Acceptance\",\"authors\":\"William M. Brandon, Alan Jacob, Colin Dunn, Song Zhang, Ang Gao, Fernando Torres, Adrian Lawrence, Irina Timofte, Srinivas Bollineni, Manish Mohanka, Juan Deleija-Lujano, Adnan Khan, Joseph Crossno, Michael Wait, Matthias Peltz, Christopher Heid, Lynn Huffman, Steve Ring, John Murala, Suresh Keshavamurthy, Alex Jaye Weston, Vaidehi Kaza\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ctr.70289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Access to transplantation is not entirely equitable with several studies demonstrating racial and socioeconomic disparities affecting the transplant process and thereby outcomes. Notably, few studies have focused on disparities prior to waitlisting. This study aimed to characterize the impact of community socioeconomic factors as measured by the Distressed Community Index (DCI) on acceptance for lung transplant waitlisting.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A retrospective review was performed on 463 patients evaluated for lung transplant waitlisting at our institution between 2016 and 2020. Community distress was calculated using the DCI, which yields a composite Distress Index (cDI) and includes data on various community characteristics. Statistical analysis was done using descriptive statistics and logistic regression methods.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of the 463 patients included, 333 (71.9%) were accepted and 130 (28.1%) were denied for waitlisting. The mean cDI was 42.5 (±30.0) and 44.8 (±30.8) (<i>p</i> = 0.45) for the accepted and declined groups, respectively, indicating mid-tier distress for both groups by DCI metrics. The cDI was not found to be associated with odds of waitlist acceptance (OR 0.997, CI 0.99–1.004, <i>p</i> = 0.455). Furthermore, there was no association between sex, race, ethnicity, public insurance coverage, or any of the subcomponents of the DCI and the odds of successful waitlisting at our institution.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This single-center retrospective evaluation found that cDI, as calculated by the DCI, and the DCI subcomponents were not associated with transplant waitlist acceptance. Future studies should be done evaluating community-level socioeconomic disparities and the utility of community disadvantage indexing tools in the lung transplant waitlisting process, with the intentions of conceptually expanding our understanding of the link between transplant outcomes and biopsychosocial candidacy.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"39 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ctr.70289\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70289\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70289","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
获得移植的机会并不完全公平,一些研究表明种族和社会经济差异影响移植过程,从而影响结果。值得注意的是,很少有研究关注等候名单之前的差异。本研究旨在描述社区社会经济因素的影响,通过贫困社区指数(DCI)来衡量肺移植等待名单的接受度。方法对2016 - 2020年我院463例肺移植候诊患者进行回顾性分析。社区痛苦是用DCI计算的,它产生了一个复合的痛苦指数(cDI),包括各种社区特征的数据。采用描述性统计和逻辑回归方法进行统计分析。结果纳入的463例患者中,333例(71.9%)被接受,130例(28.1%)被拒绝。接受组和拒绝组的平均cDI分别为42.5(±30.0)和44.8(±30.8)(p = 0.45),表明两组的DCI指标均为中等痛苦。未发现cDI与候补名单接受率相关(OR 0.997, CI 0.99-1.004, p = 0.455)。此外,性别、种族、民族、公共保险覆盖范围或DCI的任何子组成部分与我们机构成功排队的几率之间没有关联。结论:单中心回顾性评价发现,由DCI计算的cDI和DCI子成分与移植等待名单接受度无关。未来的研究应该评估社区层面的社会经济差异和社区劣势索引工具在肺移植等待列表过程中的效用,目的是在概念上扩大我们对移植结果和生物心理社会候选之间联系的理解。
Association of Community Distress With Lung Transplant Waitlist Acceptance
Introduction
Access to transplantation is not entirely equitable with several studies demonstrating racial and socioeconomic disparities affecting the transplant process and thereby outcomes. Notably, few studies have focused on disparities prior to waitlisting. This study aimed to characterize the impact of community socioeconomic factors as measured by the Distressed Community Index (DCI) on acceptance for lung transplant waitlisting.
Methods
A retrospective review was performed on 463 patients evaluated for lung transplant waitlisting at our institution between 2016 and 2020. Community distress was calculated using the DCI, which yields a composite Distress Index (cDI) and includes data on various community characteristics. Statistical analysis was done using descriptive statistics and logistic regression methods.
Results
Of the 463 patients included, 333 (71.9%) were accepted and 130 (28.1%) were denied for waitlisting. The mean cDI was 42.5 (±30.0) and 44.8 (±30.8) (p = 0.45) for the accepted and declined groups, respectively, indicating mid-tier distress for both groups by DCI metrics. The cDI was not found to be associated with odds of waitlist acceptance (OR 0.997, CI 0.99–1.004, p = 0.455). Furthermore, there was no association between sex, race, ethnicity, public insurance coverage, or any of the subcomponents of the DCI and the odds of successful waitlisting at our institution.
Conclusion
This single-center retrospective evaluation found that cDI, as calculated by the DCI, and the DCI subcomponents were not associated with transplant waitlist acceptance. Future studies should be done evaluating community-level socioeconomic disparities and the utility of community disadvantage indexing tools in the lung transplant waitlisting process, with the intentions of conceptually expanding our understanding of the link between transplant outcomes and biopsychosocial candidacy.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored.
Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include:
Immunology and immunosuppression;
Patient preparation;
Social, ethical, and psychological issues;
Complications, short- and long-term results;
Artificial organs;
Donation and preservation of organ and tissue;
Translational studies;
Advances in tissue typing;
Updates on transplant pathology;.
Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries.
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.