RNA-seq数据的荟萃分析确定干扰素诱导基因参与促进神经侵入性病原体的血脑屏障穿越

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Amod Kulkarni, Dhananjay B. Alagundagi, Mangesh Bhide, Prakash Patil
{"title":"RNA-seq数据的荟萃分析确定干扰素诱导基因参与促进神经侵入性病原体的血脑屏障穿越","authors":"Amod Kulkarni,&nbsp;Dhananjay B. Alagundagi,&nbsp;Mangesh Bhide,&nbsp;Prakash Patil","doi":"10.1007/s12031-025-02400-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Neuroinvasive pathogens are capable of breaching the blood–brain barrier (BBB), and causing central nervous system infections. Although the response of human brain microvascular endothelial cells (hBMECs), the forefront cells of BBB has been extensively studied, the roles of astrocytes and pericytes in modulating BBB integrity during infection remain less defined.</p><h3>Aims</h3><p>The study aims for a meta-analysis of RNA-seq data to compare the transcriptional response of hBMECs alone and in co-culture with astrocytes and pericytes (BBB-spheroids) following infection with <i>Neisseria meningitidis</i> and <i>Borrelia bavariensis</i>. Subsequently, identifying the pathogen-specific gene signatures that regulates the signalling pathways associated with infection and BBB disruption. </p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Unique and shared differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of hBMECs and BBB-spheroids were identified and analysed for functional enrichment using DAVID. Protein–protein interaction networks were constructed and analysed in Cytoscape using MCODE and cytoHubba to identify infection-related hub genes.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A large proportion of DEGs were unique to each BBB model during infection, 49% in <i>Neisseria</i> and 66% in <i>Borrelia</i> infection, whereas only 4.9% were shared. hBMECs predominantly expressed defence-related genes, whereas BBB-spheroids expressed genes linked to barrier function. Notably, IFIH1, IFIT1, IFIT3, ISG15, MX1, OAS1, and RSAD2 were identified as regulators of the BBB’s transcriptomic response to infection.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The meta-analysis highlights distinct yet complementary roles of endothelial cells and the supporting pericytes and astrocytes in BBB regulation to bacterial invasion. The identified hub genes may serve as key regulators of infection-driven inflammation and form potential diagnostic or prognostic targets.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":652,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Molecular Neuroscience","volume":"75 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meta-analysis of RNA-seq Data Identifies Involvement of Interferon-Induced Genes to Facilitate Blood–Brain Barrier Traversal of Neuroinvasive Pathogens\",\"authors\":\"Amod Kulkarni,&nbsp;Dhananjay B. Alagundagi,&nbsp;Mangesh Bhide,&nbsp;Prakash Patil\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12031-025-02400-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Neuroinvasive pathogens are capable of breaching the blood–brain barrier (BBB), and causing central nervous system infections. Although the response of human brain microvascular endothelial cells (hBMECs), the forefront cells of BBB has been extensively studied, the roles of astrocytes and pericytes in modulating BBB integrity during infection remain less defined.</p><h3>Aims</h3><p>The study aims for a meta-analysis of RNA-seq data to compare the transcriptional response of hBMECs alone and in co-culture with astrocytes and pericytes (BBB-spheroids) following infection with <i>Neisseria meningitidis</i> and <i>Borrelia bavariensis</i>. Subsequently, identifying the pathogen-specific gene signatures that regulates the signalling pathways associated with infection and BBB disruption. </p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Unique and shared differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of hBMECs and BBB-spheroids were identified and analysed for functional enrichment using DAVID. Protein–protein interaction networks were constructed and analysed in Cytoscape using MCODE and cytoHubba to identify infection-related hub genes.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>A large proportion of DEGs were unique to each BBB model during infection, 49% in <i>Neisseria</i> and 66% in <i>Borrelia</i> infection, whereas only 4.9% were shared. hBMECs predominantly expressed defence-related genes, whereas BBB-spheroids expressed genes linked to barrier function. Notably, IFIH1, IFIT1, IFIT3, ISG15, MX1, OAS1, and RSAD2 were identified as regulators of the BBB’s transcriptomic response to infection.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The meta-analysis highlights distinct yet complementary roles of endothelial cells and the supporting pericytes and astrocytes in BBB regulation to bacterial invasion. The identified hub genes may serve as key regulators of infection-driven inflammation and form potential diagnostic or prognostic targets.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Molecular Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"75 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Molecular Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12031-025-02400-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Molecular Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12031-025-02400-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:神经侵入性病原体能够突破血脑屏障(BBB),引起中枢神经系统感染。尽管作为血脑屏障前沿细胞的人脑微血管内皮细胞(hBMECs)的反应已被广泛研究,但星形胶质细胞和周细胞在感染期间调节血脑屏障完整性中的作用仍不明确。该研究旨在对RNA-seq数据进行荟萃分析,比较hbmec单独和与星形胶质细胞和周细胞(bbb球体)共培养在感染脑膜炎奈瑟菌和巴伐利亚伯氏疏螺旋体后的转录反应。随后,确定了调节与感染和血脑屏障破坏相关的信号通路的病原体特异性基因特征。方法对hbmec和bbb -spheroid的独特和共有差异表达基因(DEGs)进行鉴定,并使用DAVID进行功能富集分析。利用MCODE和cytoHubba在Cytoscape中构建并分析了蛋白-蛋白相互作用网络,以鉴定感染相关的中心基因。结果不同血脑屏障感染时,不同血脑屏障模型的deg所占比例很大,其中奈瑟菌为49%,伯氏疏螺旋体为66%,而共有deg的比例仅为4.9%。hbmec主要表达防御相关基因,而bbb球体主要表达与屏障功能相关的基因。值得注意的是,IFIH1、IFIT1、IFIT3、ISG15、MX1、OAS1和RSAD2被鉴定为血脑屏障对感染的转录组反应的调节因子。结论荟萃分析强调了内皮细胞、周细胞和星形胶质细胞在血脑屏障调节细菌侵袭中的不同而互补的作用。已确定的枢纽基因可能是感染驱动炎症的关键调节因子,并形成潜在的诊断或预后靶点。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Meta-analysis of RNA-seq Data Identifies Involvement of Interferon-Induced Genes to Facilitate Blood–Brain Barrier Traversal of Neuroinvasive Pathogens

Meta-analysis of RNA-seq Data Identifies Involvement of Interferon-Induced Genes to Facilitate Blood–Brain Barrier Traversal of Neuroinvasive Pathogens

Meta-analysis of RNA-seq Data Identifies Involvement of Interferon-Induced Genes to Facilitate Blood–Brain Barrier Traversal of Neuroinvasive Pathogens

Background

Neuroinvasive pathogens are capable of breaching the blood–brain barrier (BBB), and causing central nervous system infections. Although the response of human brain microvascular endothelial cells (hBMECs), the forefront cells of BBB has been extensively studied, the roles of astrocytes and pericytes in modulating BBB integrity during infection remain less defined.

Aims

The study aims for a meta-analysis of RNA-seq data to compare the transcriptional response of hBMECs alone and in co-culture with astrocytes and pericytes (BBB-spheroids) following infection with Neisseria meningitidis and Borrelia bavariensis. Subsequently, identifying the pathogen-specific gene signatures that regulates the signalling pathways associated with infection and BBB disruption.

Methods

Unique and shared differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of hBMECs and BBB-spheroids were identified and analysed for functional enrichment using DAVID. Protein–protein interaction networks were constructed and analysed in Cytoscape using MCODE and cytoHubba to identify infection-related hub genes.

Results

A large proportion of DEGs were unique to each BBB model during infection, 49% in Neisseria and 66% in Borrelia infection, whereas only 4.9% were shared. hBMECs predominantly expressed defence-related genes, whereas BBB-spheroids expressed genes linked to barrier function. Notably, IFIH1, IFIT1, IFIT3, ISG15, MX1, OAS1, and RSAD2 were identified as regulators of the BBB’s transcriptomic response to infection.

Conclusions

The meta-analysis highlights distinct yet complementary roles of endothelial cells and the supporting pericytes and astrocytes in BBB regulation to bacterial invasion. The identified hub genes may serve as key regulators of infection-driven inflammation and form potential diagnostic or prognostic targets.

Graphical Abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Molecular Neuroscience
Journal of Molecular Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
142
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Molecular Neuroscience is committed to the rapid publication of original findings that increase our understanding of the molecular structure, function, and development of the nervous system. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts will be scientific excellence, originality, and relevance to the field of molecular neuroscience. Manuscripts with clinical relevance are especially encouraged since the journal seeks to provide a means for accelerating the progression of basic research findings toward clinical utilization. All experiments described in the Journal of Molecular Neuroscience that involve the use of animal or human subjects must have been approved by the appropriate institutional review committee and conform to accepted ethical standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信