先进的介入性疼痛治疗在哪里进行?

Sandy Christiansen , Rosa Garcia , Daniel A. Jimenez , Shauna Rakshe
{"title":"先进的介入性疼痛治疗在哪里进行?","authors":"Sandy Christiansen ,&nbsp;Rosa Garcia ,&nbsp;Daniel A. Jimenez ,&nbsp;Shauna Rakshe","doi":"10.1016/j.inpm.2025.100631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>An unprecedented volume of interventional procedures has entered the pain medicine market, including many “advanced” interventional pain procedures. Given the rapid influx, there is concern that there is discordance between what is taught in pain medicine fellowship programs and done in post-graduate practice.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The goal of the study was to compare sales volumes of advanced procedure devices in academic versus non-academic practice settings to better understand the status quo of procedural practice patterns. This information will be critical to establish a baseline understanding of where advanced pain procedures are happening for future comparison.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional observational study examines relative percentages of industry-reported device sales to academic versus non-academic practices from January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023 in predefined regions of the United States. The data were tabulated and reported as means with corresponding ranges.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Six companies, representing nine distinct interventional pain procedures, certified the requested data. The region with the lowest relative mean device sales at academic institutions was the West (10 %) and the highest was the Northeast (22 %). The procedure with the lowest relative mean sales at academic institutions was dorsal root ganglion stimulation (4 %) and the highest was vertebral body cooled radiofrequency for bone tumors (30 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study highlights the difference between the relative percentage sales of advanced procedure devices in non-academic versus academic institutions, favoring non-academic sites of service. Yet, for each reported pain procedure, there were device sales in academic settings for almost all regions. It will be essential to continue to monitor how academic procedural training compares to post-graduate practice realities to tailor future educational offerings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100727,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Pain Medicine","volume":"4 3","pages":"Article 100631"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where are advanced interventional pain procedures happening?\",\"authors\":\"Sandy Christiansen ,&nbsp;Rosa Garcia ,&nbsp;Daniel A. Jimenez ,&nbsp;Shauna Rakshe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.inpm.2025.100631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>An unprecedented volume of interventional procedures has entered the pain medicine market, including many “advanced” interventional pain procedures. Given the rapid influx, there is concern that there is discordance between what is taught in pain medicine fellowship programs and done in post-graduate practice.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The goal of the study was to compare sales volumes of advanced procedure devices in academic versus non-academic practice settings to better understand the status quo of procedural practice patterns. This information will be critical to establish a baseline understanding of where advanced pain procedures are happening for future comparison.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This cross-sectional observational study examines relative percentages of industry-reported device sales to academic versus non-academic practices from January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023 in predefined regions of the United States. The data were tabulated and reported as means with corresponding ranges.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Six companies, representing nine distinct interventional pain procedures, certified the requested data. The region with the lowest relative mean device sales at academic institutions was the West (10 %) and the highest was the Northeast (22 %). The procedure with the lowest relative mean sales at academic institutions was dorsal root ganglion stimulation (4 %) and the highest was vertebral body cooled radiofrequency for bone tumors (30 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study highlights the difference between the relative percentage sales of advanced procedure devices in non-academic versus academic institutions, favoring non-academic sites of service. Yet, for each reported pain procedure, there were device sales in academic settings for almost all regions. It will be essential to continue to monitor how academic procedural training compares to post-graduate practice realities to tailor future educational offerings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100631\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772594425000925\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772594425000925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前所未有的介入手术进入了疼痛药物市场,其中包括许多“先进”的介入疼痛手术。鉴于患者的快速涌入,人们担心疼痛医学研究项目中教授的内容与研究生实践中所做的不一致。目的本研究的目的是比较先进的手术器械在学术和非学术实践环境中的销量,以更好地了解手术实践模式的现状。这一信息对于建立了解高级疼痛手术发生位置的基线,以便将来进行比较至关重要。方法:本横断面观察性研究检查了2023年1月1日至2023年12月31日在美国预定义地区,行业报告的设备销售相对于学术和非学术实践的百分比。将数据制成表格,并以相应范围的平均值报告。结果6家公司,代表9种不同的介入性疼痛手术,证实了所要求的数据。学术机构的相对平均设备销售量最低的地区是西部(10%),最高的地区是东北部(22%)。学术机构中相对平均销售额最低的手术是背根神经节刺激(4%),最高的是椎体冷却射频治疗骨肿瘤(30%)。结论本研究突出了先进手术设备在非学术机构和学术机构的相对销售百分比之间的差异,有利于非学术服务场所。然而,对于每一个报告的疼痛手术,几乎所有地区的学术机构都有设备销售。继续监测学术程序培训与研究生实践现实的比较,以定制未来的教育产品,这将是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Where are advanced interventional pain procedures happening?

Background

An unprecedented volume of interventional procedures has entered the pain medicine market, including many “advanced” interventional pain procedures. Given the rapid influx, there is concern that there is discordance between what is taught in pain medicine fellowship programs and done in post-graduate practice.

Objective

The goal of the study was to compare sales volumes of advanced procedure devices in academic versus non-academic practice settings to better understand the status quo of procedural practice patterns. This information will be critical to establish a baseline understanding of where advanced pain procedures are happening for future comparison.

Methods

This cross-sectional observational study examines relative percentages of industry-reported device sales to academic versus non-academic practices from January 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023 in predefined regions of the United States. The data were tabulated and reported as means with corresponding ranges.

Results

Six companies, representing nine distinct interventional pain procedures, certified the requested data. The region with the lowest relative mean device sales at academic institutions was the West (10 %) and the highest was the Northeast (22 %). The procedure with the lowest relative mean sales at academic institutions was dorsal root ganglion stimulation (4 %) and the highest was vertebral body cooled radiofrequency for bone tumors (30 %).

Conclusion

This study highlights the difference between the relative percentage sales of advanced procedure devices in non-academic versus academic institutions, favoring non-academic sites of service. Yet, for each reported pain procedure, there were device sales in academic settings for almost all regions. It will be essential to continue to monitor how academic procedural training compares to post-graduate practice realities to tailor future educational offerings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信