老年人孤独感宏观层面的研究现状

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Fredrica Nyqvist , Laura Coll-Planas , Joanna McHugh Power
{"title":"老年人孤独感宏观层面的研究现状","authors":"Fredrica Nyqvist ,&nbsp;Laura Coll-Planas ,&nbsp;Joanna McHugh Power","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this article, we review and categorize recent evidence exploring loneliness in older adults from a macro-level perspective to i) provide insights into current research and ii) propose future research directions. We categorize recent studies into three types: observational studies, intervention studies, and conceptual papers. Recent observational studies analyze loneliness using large European datasets such as SHARE, or harmonized datasets from other continents — mostly from a cross-sectional perspective, but also using longitudinal designs. In contrast, macro-level intervention studies are infrequent and mostly focused on the negative impact of COVID restrictive policies on loneliness. Current conceptual papers highlight the very need for macro-level perspectives and emphasize the importance of integrating these approaches into future research to more accurately identify etiological and sustaining factors shaping loneliness. Although macro-level causes of loneliness have been theoretically recognized, more empirical evidence confirming their role is needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 101583"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current research trends in macro-level perspectives on loneliness in older adults\",\"authors\":\"Fredrica Nyqvist ,&nbsp;Laura Coll-Planas ,&nbsp;Joanna McHugh Power\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101583\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In this article, we review and categorize recent evidence exploring loneliness in older adults from a macro-level perspective to i) provide insights into current research and ii) propose future research directions. We categorize recent studies into three types: observational studies, intervention studies, and conceptual papers. Recent observational studies analyze loneliness using large European datasets such as SHARE, or harmonized datasets from other continents — mostly from a cross-sectional perspective, but also using longitudinal designs. In contrast, macro-level intervention studies are infrequent and mostly focused on the negative impact of COVID restrictive policies on loneliness. Current conceptual papers highlight the very need for macro-level perspectives and emphasize the importance of integrating these approaches into future research to more accurately identify etiological and sustaining factors shaping loneliness. Although macro-level causes of loneliness have been theoretically recognized, more empirical evidence confirming their role is needed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences\",\"volume\":\"66 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101583\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154625001020\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154625001020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,我们从宏观的角度回顾和分类了最近关于老年人孤独的研究证据,以i)为当前的研究提供见解,ii)提出未来的研究方向。我们将最近的研究分为三种类型:观察性研究、干预研究和概念性论文。最近的观察性研究使用SHARE等大型欧洲数据集或来自其他大陆的统一数据集分析孤独感——主要是从横截面角度分析,但也使用纵向设计。相比之下,宏观层面的干预研究很少,而且主要集中在COVID限制政策对孤独感的负面影响上。目前的概念性论文强调了宏观层面视角的必要性,并强调了将这些方法整合到未来研究中的重要性,以更准确地识别形成孤独感的病因和持续因素。虽然孤独的宏观原因在理论上已经得到承认,但还需要更多的经验证据来证实它们的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current research trends in macro-level perspectives on loneliness in older adults
In this article, we review and categorize recent evidence exploring loneliness in older adults from a macro-level perspective to i) provide insights into current research and ii) propose future research directions. We categorize recent studies into three types: observational studies, intervention studies, and conceptual papers. Recent observational studies analyze loneliness using large European datasets such as SHARE, or harmonized datasets from other continents — mostly from a cross-sectional perspective, but also using longitudinal designs. In contrast, macro-level intervention studies are infrequent and mostly focused on the negative impact of COVID restrictive policies on loneliness. Current conceptual papers highlight the very need for macro-level perspectives and emphasize the importance of integrating these approaches into future research to more accurately identify etiological and sustaining factors shaping loneliness. Although macro-level causes of loneliness have been theoretically recognized, more empirical evidence confirming their role is needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Neuroscience-Cognitive Neuroscience
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
2.00%
发文量
135
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences is a systematic, integrative review journal that provides a unique and educational platform for updates on the expanding volume of information published in the field of behavioral sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信