Fredrica Nyqvist , Laura Coll-Planas , Joanna McHugh Power
{"title":"老年人孤独感宏观层面的研究现状","authors":"Fredrica Nyqvist , Laura Coll-Planas , Joanna McHugh Power","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this article, we review and categorize recent evidence exploring loneliness in older adults from a macro-level perspective to i) provide insights into current research and ii) propose future research directions. We categorize recent studies into three types: observational studies, intervention studies, and conceptual papers. Recent observational studies analyze loneliness using large European datasets such as SHARE, or harmonized datasets from other continents — mostly from a cross-sectional perspective, but also using longitudinal designs. In contrast, macro-level intervention studies are infrequent and mostly focused on the negative impact of COVID restrictive policies on loneliness. Current conceptual papers highlight the very need for macro-level perspectives and emphasize the importance of integrating these approaches into future research to more accurately identify etiological and sustaining factors shaping loneliness. Although macro-level causes of loneliness have been theoretically recognized, more empirical evidence confirming their role is needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"66 ","pages":"Article 101583"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current research trends in macro-level perspectives on loneliness in older adults\",\"authors\":\"Fredrica Nyqvist , Laura Coll-Planas , Joanna McHugh Power\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101583\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In this article, we review and categorize recent evidence exploring loneliness in older adults from a macro-level perspective to i) provide insights into current research and ii) propose future research directions. We categorize recent studies into three types: observational studies, intervention studies, and conceptual papers. Recent observational studies analyze loneliness using large European datasets such as SHARE, or harmonized datasets from other continents — mostly from a cross-sectional perspective, but also using longitudinal designs. In contrast, macro-level intervention studies are infrequent and mostly focused on the negative impact of COVID restrictive policies on loneliness. Current conceptual papers highlight the very need for macro-level perspectives and emphasize the importance of integrating these approaches into future research to more accurately identify etiological and sustaining factors shaping loneliness. Although macro-level causes of loneliness have been theoretically recognized, more empirical evidence confirming their role is needed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences\",\"volume\":\"66 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101583\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154625001020\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154625001020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Current research trends in macro-level perspectives on loneliness in older adults
In this article, we review and categorize recent evidence exploring loneliness in older adults from a macro-level perspective to i) provide insights into current research and ii) propose future research directions. We categorize recent studies into three types: observational studies, intervention studies, and conceptual papers. Recent observational studies analyze loneliness using large European datasets such as SHARE, or harmonized datasets from other continents — mostly from a cross-sectional perspective, but also using longitudinal designs. In contrast, macro-level intervention studies are infrequent and mostly focused on the negative impact of COVID restrictive policies on loneliness. Current conceptual papers highlight the very need for macro-level perspectives and emphasize the importance of integrating these approaches into future research to more accurately identify etiological and sustaining factors shaping loneliness. Although macro-level causes of loneliness have been theoretically recognized, more empirical evidence confirming their role is needed.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences is a systematic, integrative review journal that provides a unique and educational platform for updates on the expanding volume of information published in the field of behavioral sciences.