{"title":"百香果皮中生物活性物质的提取和浓缩方法的经济评价","authors":"Débora Tamires Vitor Pereira , Giovani Leone Zabot , Julian Martínez","doi":"10.1016/j.fbp.2025.08.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This work evaluated the economic feasibility of integrating Ultrasound-Assisted Pressurized Liquid Extraction (UAPLE) and Nanofiltration (NF) for the extraction and concentration of bioactive compounds from passion fruit rinds at different production scales. Furthermore, it analyzed the main cost components and profitability indicators to assess its potential for industrial implementation. A techno-economic analysis was performed using SuperPro Designer 9.0® to simulate three production scales: 2 × 30 L, 2 × 300 L, and 2 × 3000 L. The study evaluated key economic indicators, including Cost of Manufacturing (COM), Total Capital Investment (TCI), Gross Margin (GM), Return on Investment (ROI), Net Present Value (NPV), and Payback time. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the impact of extract selling prices on profitability. Scaling up significantly reduced COM due to fixed cost dilution and increased productivity. Raw material (CRM) and utility (CUT) costs were the primary cost drivers, while fixed capital investment (FCI) and operational labor (COL) had lower relative impact at larger scales. The DK and DL membranes provided the lowest COM due to their higher recovery efficiency of bioactive compounds. Sensitivity analysis indicated that profitability is highly dependent on selling price, with payback time under two years in the most favorable scenarios. The UAPLE-NF process proved to have strong economic feasibility at an industrial scale, with significant cost reductions and promising profitability indicators. These findings support its application as a sustainable alternative for bioactive compound extraction. Future research should explore process integration within biorefinery models to enhance sustainability and resource efficiency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12134,"journal":{"name":"Food and Bioproducts Processing","volume":"153 ","pages":"Pages 536-545"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic evaluation of a promising strategy for the extraction and concentration of bioactive compounds from passion fruit rinds\",\"authors\":\"Débora Tamires Vitor Pereira , Giovani Leone Zabot , Julian Martínez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fbp.2025.08.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This work evaluated the economic feasibility of integrating Ultrasound-Assisted Pressurized Liquid Extraction (UAPLE) and Nanofiltration (NF) for the extraction and concentration of bioactive compounds from passion fruit rinds at different production scales. Furthermore, it analyzed the main cost components and profitability indicators to assess its potential for industrial implementation. A techno-economic analysis was performed using SuperPro Designer 9.0® to simulate three production scales: 2 × 30 L, 2 × 300 L, and 2 × 3000 L. The study evaluated key economic indicators, including Cost of Manufacturing (COM), Total Capital Investment (TCI), Gross Margin (GM), Return on Investment (ROI), Net Present Value (NPV), and Payback time. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the impact of extract selling prices on profitability. Scaling up significantly reduced COM due to fixed cost dilution and increased productivity. Raw material (CRM) and utility (CUT) costs were the primary cost drivers, while fixed capital investment (FCI) and operational labor (COL) had lower relative impact at larger scales. The DK and DL membranes provided the lowest COM due to their higher recovery efficiency of bioactive compounds. Sensitivity analysis indicated that profitability is highly dependent on selling price, with payback time under two years in the most favorable scenarios. The UAPLE-NF process proved to have strong economic feasibility at an industrial scale, with significant cost reductions and promising profitability indicators. These findings support its application as a sustainable alternative for bioactive compound extraction. Future research should explore process integration within biorefinery models to enhance sustainability and resource efficiency.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food and Bioproducts Processing\",\"volume\":\"153 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 536-545\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food and Bioproducts Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960308525001579\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Bioproducts Processing","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960308525001579","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Economic evaluation of a promising strategy for the extraction and concentration of bioactive compounds from passion fruit rinds
This work evaluated the economic feasibility of integrating Ultrasound-Assisted Pressurized Liquid Extraction (UAPLE) and Nanofiltration (NF) for the extraction and concentration of bioactive compounds from passion fruit rinds at different production scales. Furthermore, it analyzed the main cost components and profitability indicators to assess its potential for industrial implementation. A techno-economic analysis was performed using SuperPro Designer 9.0® to simulate three production scales: 2 × 30 L, 2 × 300 L, and 2 × 3000 L. The study evaluated key economic indicators, including Cost of Manufacturing (COM), Total Capital Investment (TCI), Gross Margin (GM), Return on Investment (ROI), Net Present Value (NPV), and Payback time. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the impact of extract selling prices on profitability. Scaling up significantly reduced COM due to fixed cost dilution and increased productivity. Raw material (CRM) and utility (CUT) costs were the primary cost drivers, while fixed capital investment (FCI) and operational labor (COL) had lower relative impact at larger scales. The DK and DL membranes provided the lowest COM due to their higher recovery efficiency of bioactive compounds. Sensitivity analysis indicated that profitability is highly dependent on selling price, with payback time under two years in the most favorable scenarios. The UAPLE-NF process proved to have strong economic feasibility at an industrial scale, with significant cost reductions and promising profitability indicators. These findings support its application as a sustainable alternative for bioactive compound extraction. Future research should explore process integration within biorefinery models to enhance sustainability and resource efficiency.
期刊介绍:
Official Journal of the European Federation of Chemical Engineering:
Part C
FBP aims to be the principal international journal for publication of high quality, original papers in the branches of engineering and science dedicated to the safe processing of biological products. It is the only journal to exploit the synergy between biotechnology, bioprocessing and food engineering.
Papers showing how research results can be used in engineering design, and accounts of experimental or theoretical research work bringing new perspectives to established principles, highlighting unsolved problems or indicating directions for future research, are particularly welcome. Contributions that deal with new developments in equipment or processes and that can be given quantitative expression are encouraged. The journal is especially interested in papers that extend the boundaries of food and bioproducts processing.
The journal has a strong emphasis on the interface between engineering and food or bioproducts. Papers that are not likely to be published are those:
• Primarily concerned with food formulation
• That use experimental design techniques to obtain response surfaces but gain little insight from them
• That are empirical and ignore established mechanistic models, e.g., empirical drying curves
• That are primarily concerned about sensory evaluation and colour
• Concern the extraction, encapsulation and/or antioxidant activity of a specific biological material without providing insight that could be applied to a similar but different material,
• Containing only chemical analyses of biological materials.