巴西版林肯犬类焦虑量表的适应和心理测量特性

IF 2 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Maria Cecília de Souza , Gabriel Quaresma Bastos , Crystian Moraes Silva Gomes , Rosana Suemi Tokumaru
{"title":"巴西版林肯犬类焦虑量表的适应和心理测量特性","authors":"Maria Cecília de Souza ,&nbsp;Gabriel Quaresma Bastos ,&nbsp;Crystian Moraes Silva Gomes ,&nbsp;Rosana Suemi Tokumaru","doi":"10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Canine anxiety is an emotional state that affects both the animal's well-being and its relationship with owners, often being associated with problematic behaviors. The Lincoln Canine Anxiety Scale (LCAS) was developed to reliably measure canine anxiety, particularly in response to loud noises such as fireworks. In this study, the LCAS was adapted into Portuguese and for the Brazilian cultural context, with its psychometric properties tested in relation to a broad set of anxiety-inducing situations, analyzed collectively. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a bidimensional structure, distinguishing behaviors related to behavioral inhibition (Passivity Factor) from those reflecting behavioral activation (Activity Factor). Reliability and consistency indicators, McDonald’s omega, Composite Reliability and ordinal Cronbach’s alpha, supported the adequacy of the factors (Passivity: ω = 0.82, CR = 0.84, α = 0.82; Activity: ω = 0.74, CR = 0.76 α = 0.74,). Confirmatory factor analysis further supported the internal structure. Item response theory analyses indicated adequate item discrimination, ordered thresholds, and no differential item functioning by dog or owner sex. These results offer evidence of internal structure and response pattern validity of the LCAS-Br.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8222,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","volume":"292 ","pages":"Article 106791"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adaptation and psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Lincoln Canine Anxiety Scale\",\"authors\":\"Maria Cecília de Souza ,&nbsp;Gabriel Quaresma Bastos ,&nbsp;Crystian Moraes Silva Gomes ,&nbsp;Rosana Suemi Tokumaru\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Canine anxiety is an emotional state that affects both the animal's well-being and its relationship with owners, often being associated with problematic behaviors. The Lincoln Canine Anxiety Scale (LCAS) was developed to reliably measure canine anxiety, particularly in response to loud noises such as fireworks. In this study, the LCAS was adapted into Portuguese and for the Brazilian cultural context, with its psychometric properties tested in relation to a broad set of anxiety-inducing situations, analyzed collectively. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a bidimensional structure, distinguishing behaviors related to behavioral inhibition (Passivity Factor) from those reflecting behavioral activation (Activity Factor). Reliability and consistency indicators, McDonald’s omega, Composite Reliability and ordinal Cronbach’s alpha, supported the adequacy of the factors (Passivity: ω = 0.82, CR = 0.84, α = 0.82; Activity: ω = 0.74, CR = 0.76 α = 0.74,). Confirmatory factor analysis further supported the internal structure. Item response theory analyses indicated adequate item discrimination, ordered thresholds, and no differential item functioning by dog or owner sex. These results offer evidence of internal structure and response pattern validity of the LCAS-Br.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Animal Behaviour Science\",\"volume\":\"292 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106791\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Animal Behaviour Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159125002898\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159125002898","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

狗的焦虑是一种情绪状态,会影响动物的健康和与主人的关系,通常与问题行为有关。林肯犬类焦虑量表(LCAS)的开发是为了可靠地测量犬类的焦虑,特别是对烟花等大声噪音的反应。在这项研究中,LCAS被改编成葡萄牙语和巴西文化背景,并在一系列广泛的焦虑诱发情况下对其心理测量特性进行了测试,并进行了集体分析。探索性因子分析揭示了行为抑制(被动因子)与行为激活(主动因子)的二元结构。信度和一致性指标McDonald’s omega、复合信度和序数Cronbach’s alpha支持了因子的充分性(被动性:ω = 0.82, CR = 0.84, α = 0.82;主动性:ω = 0.74, CR = 0.76, α = 0.74,)。验证性因子分析进一步支持了内部结构。项目反应理论分析表明,足够的项目歧视,有序的阈值,没有差异的项目功能,狗或主人的性别。这些结果为LCAS-Br的内部结构和响应模式有效性提供了证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adaptation and psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Lincoln Canine Anxiety Scale
Canine anxiety is an emotional state that affects both the animal's well-being and its relationship with owners, often being associated with problematic behaviors. The Lincoln Canine Anxiety Scale (LCAS) was developed to reliably measure canine anxiety, particularly in response to loud noises such as fireworks. In this study, the LCAS was adapted into Portuguese and for the Brazilian cultural context, with its psychometric properties tested in relation to a broad set of anxiety-inducing situations, analyzed collectively. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a bidimensional structure, distinguishing behaviors related to behavioral inhibition (Passivity Factor) from those reflecting behavioral activation (Activity Factor). Reliability and consistency indicators, McDonald’s omega, Composite Reliability and ordinal Cronbach’s alpha, supported the adequacy of the factors (Passivity: ω = 0.82, CR = 0.84, α = 0.82; Activity: ω = 0.74, CR = 0.76 α = 0.74,). Confirmatory factor analysis further supported the internal structure. Item response theory analyses indicated adequate item discrimination, ordered thresholds, and no differential item functioning by dog or owner sex. These results offer evidence of internal structure and response pattern validity of the LCAS-Br.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Applied Animal Behaviour Science 农林科学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
21.70%
发文量
191
审稿时长
18.1 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal publishes relevant information on the behaviour of domesticated and utilized animals. Topics covered include: -Behaviour of farm, zoo and laboratory animals in relation to animal management and welfare -Behaviour of companion animals in relation to behavioural problems, for example, in relation to the training of dogs for different purposes, in relation to behavioural problems -Studies of the behaviour of wild animals when these studies are relevant from an applied perspective, for example in relation to wildlife management, pest management or nature conservation -Methodological studies within relevant fields The principal subjects are farm, companion and laboratory animals, including, of course, poultry. The journal also deals with the following animal subjects: -Those involved in any farming system, e.g. deer, rabbits and fur-bearing animals -Those in ANY form of confinement, e.g. zoos, safari parks and other forms of display -Feral animals, and any animal species which impinge on farming operations, e.g. as causes of loss or damage -Species used for hunting, recreation etc. may also be considered as acceptable subjects in some instances -Laboratory animals, if the material relates to their behavioural requirements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信