{"title":"校对Polδ和Polε的核酸外切酶活性对链终止核苷类似物的去除有不同的作用","authors":"Eri Nishizawa , Hiromori Ohkubo , Ryotaro Kawasumi , Masataka Tsuda , Kouji Hirota","doi":"10.1016/j.dnarep.2025.103885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Chain-terminating nucleoside analogs (CTNAs) are incorporated into genome during replication by replicative polymerase delta (Polδ) and epsilon (Polε), then inhibit DNA synthesis by preventing subsequent polymerization. The proofreading exonuclease activity of Polε removes the incorporated CTNAs, thereby contributing to cellular tolerance to these drugs. However, the contribution of Polδ’s proofreading exonuclease activity has not been clarified, nor has the relationship between Polδ and Polε been well understood. We here show that Polδ’s exonuclease activity contributes to the cellular tolerance to CTNAs, with the role of Polδ and Polε exonucleases differing depending on the kinds of CTNAs. We tested the sensitivity of <em>POLD1</em><sup><em>exo−/+</em></sup> cells to a CTNA, Ara-C, and found that expression of the exonuclease deficient Polδ sensitizes cells to Ara-C. Furthermore, the exonuclease deficient Polδ reduced cell viability upon Ara-C to the same extent in both Polε exonuclease-proficient and -deficient cells, indicating that these two polymerases independently contribute to cellular tolerance to Ara-C. In contrast, wild-type, <em>POLD1</em><sup><em>exo−/+</em></sup>, and <em>POLE1</em><sup><em>exo−/−</em></sup> cells exhibited similar sensitivity to ddC, AZT, and alovudine, whilst <em>POLD1</em><sup><em>exo−/+</em></sup>/<em>POLE1</em><sup><em>exo−/−</em></sup> cells were considerably more sensitive compared with these cells, indicating that Polδ and Polε compensate for each other. Finally, we found that exonuclease activities of replicative polymerases cannot remove ACV from the end of nascent DNA. Taken together, our findings show that CTNAs have a differential impact on the replication fork, and the requirement of the exonuclease activities of replicative polymerases varies depending on the kinds of CTNAs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":300,"journal":{"name":"DNA Repair","volume":"153 ","pages":"Article 103885"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proofreading exonuclease activities of Polδ and Polε differentially contribute to the removal of chain-terminating nucleoside analogs\",\"authors\":\"Eri Nishizawa , Hiromori Ohkubo , Ryotaro Kawasumi , Masataka Tsuda , Kouji Hirota\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dnarep.2025.103885\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Chain-terminating nucleoside analogs (CTNAs) are incorporated into genome during replication by replicative polymerase delta (Polδ) and epsilon (Polε), then inhibit DNA synthesis by preventing subsequent polymerization. The proofreading exonuclease activity of Polε removes the incorporated CTNAs, thereby contributing to cellular tolerance to these drugs. However, the contribution of Polδ’s proofreading exonuclease activity has not been clarified, nor has the relationship between Polδ and Polε been well understood. We here show that Polδ’s exonuclease activity contributes to the cellular tolerance to CTNAs, with the role of Polδ and Polε exonucleases differing depending on the kinds of CTNAs. We tested the sensitivity of <em>POLD1</em><sup><em>exo−/+</em></sup> cells to a CTNA, Ara-C, and found that expression of the exonuclease deficient Polδ sensitizes cells to Ara-C. Furthermore, the exonuclease deficient Polδ reduced cell viability upon Ara-C to the same extent in both Polε exonuclease-proficient and -deficient cells, indicating that these two polymerases independently contribute to cellular tolerance to Ara-C. In contrast, wild-type, <em>POLD1</em><sup><em>exo−/+</em></sup>, and <em>POLE1</em><sup><em>exo−/−</em></sup> cells exhibited similar sensitivity to ddC, AZT, and alovudine, whilst <em>POLD1</em><sup><em>exo−/+</em></sup>/<em>POLE1</em><sup><em>exo−/−</em></sup> cells were considerably more sensitive compared with these cells, indicating that Polδ and Polε compensate for each other. Finally, we found that exonuclease activities of replicative polymerases cannot remove ACV from the end of nascent DNA. Taken together, our findings show that CTNAs have a differential impact on the replication fork, and the requirement of the exonuclease activities of replicative polymerases varies depending on the kinds of CTNAs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DNA Repair\",\"volume\":\"153 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103885\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DNA Repair\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568786425000813\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DNA Repair","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1568786425000813","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Proofreading exonuclease activities of Polδ and Polε differentially contribute to the removal of chain-terminating nucleoside analogs
Chain-terminating nucleoside analogs (CTNAs) are incorporated into genome during replication by replicative polymerase delta (Polδ) and epsilon (Polε), then inhibit DNA synthesis by preventing subsequent polymerization. The proofreading exonuclease activity of Polε removes the incorporated CTNAs, thereby contributing to cellular tolerance to these drugs. However, the contribution of Polδ’s proofreading exonuclease activity has not been clarified, nor has the relationship between Polδ and Polε been well understood. We here show that Polδ’s exonuclease activity contributes to the cellular tolerance to CTNAs, with the role of Polδ and Polε exonucleases differing depending on the kinds of CTNAs. We tested the sensitivity of POLD1exo−/+ cells to a CTNA, Ara-C, and found that expression of the exonuclease deficient Polδ sensitizes cells to Ara-C. Furthermore, the exonuclease deficient Polδ reduced cell viability upon Ara-C to the same extent in both Polε exonuclease-proficient and -deficient cells, indicating that these two polymerases independently contribute to cellular tolerance to Ara-C. In contrast, wild-type, POLD1exo−/+, and POLE1exo−/− cells exhibited similar sensitivity to ddC, AZT, and alovudine, whilst POLD1exo−/+/POLE1exo−/− cells were considerably more sensitive compared with these cells, indicating that Polδ and Polε compensate for each other. Finally, we found that exonuclease activities of replicative polymerases cannot remove ACV from the end of nascent DNA. Taken together, our findings show that CTNAs have a differential impact on the replication fork, and the requirement of the exonuclease activities of replicative polymerases varies depending on the kinds of CTNAs.
期刊介绍:
DNA Repair provides a forum for the comprehensive coverage of DNA repair and cellular responses to DNA damage. The journal publishes original observations on genetic, cellular, biochemical, structural and molecular aspects of DNA repair, mutagenesis, cell cycle regulation, apoptosis and other biological responses in cells exposed to genomic insult, as well as their relationship to human disease.
DNA Repair publishes full-length research articles, brief reports on research, and reviews. The journal welcomes articles describing databases, methods and new technologies supporting research on DNA repair and responses to DNA damage. Letters to the Editor, hot topics and classics in DNA repair, historical reflections, book reviews and meeting reports also will be considered for publication.