在COVID-19期间,气候变化推文中的担忧和情绪有限

IF 7 1区 心理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Oleg Smirnov , Pei-Hsun Hsieh , Ignacio Urbina
{"title":"在COVID-19期间,气候变化推文中的担忧和情绪有限","authors":"Oleg Smirnov ,&nbsp;Pei-Hsun Hsieh ,&nbsp;Ignacio Urbina","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Whether the COVID-19 pandemic diverted public attention away from the issue of climate change is a topic that divided scholars in recent years. Two competing theories have emerged: the ‘finite pool of worry’, which asserts that concerns over the pandemic have overshadowed those for climate change, and the ‘finite pool of attention’, which argues that although attention to climate change has waned, worry has remained steady or even intensified – in line with affect generalization theory. Survey research appears to support the latter hypothesis more strongly. In this study, we investigate this theoretical discourse and revisit these conclusions by conducting an emotional content analysis on a novel dataset of nearly 24 million Twitter posts related to climate change from 2018 to 2022. Employing three lexicons—LIWC, NRC Lex, and VADER—we find that climate change tweets exhibit a decline in expressions of fear, anxiety, and other negative emotions concurrent with COVID-19 surges. Our daily-level analysis incorporates controls such as media coverage of climate change, the occurrence of climate-related disasters like hurricanes and wildfires, and the impact of major political events, including the 2020 presidential election. The negative association between COVID-19 severity and climate change worry was strongest in 2020, weakening progressively in 2021 and 2022.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 102728"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finite pool of worry and emotions in climate change tweets during COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Oleg Smirnov ,&nbsp;Pei-Hsun Hsieh ,&nbsp;Ignacio Urbina\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102728\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Whether the COVID-19 pandemic diverted public attention away from the issue of climate change is a topic that divided scholars in recent years. Two competing theories have emerged: the ‘finite pool of worry’, which asserts that concerns over the pandemic have overshadowed those for climate change, and the ‘finite pool of attention’, which argues that although attention to climate change has waned, worry has remained steady or even intensified – in line with affect generalization theory. Survey research appears to support the latter hypothesis more strongly. In this study, we investigate this theoretical discourse and revisit these conclusions by conducting an emotional content analysis on a novel dataset of nearly 24 million Twitter posts related to climate change from 2018 to 2022. Employing three lexicons—LIWC, NRC Lex, and VADER—we find that climate change tweets exhibit a decline in expressions of fear, anxiety, and other negative emotions concurrent with COVID-19 surges. Our daily-level analysis incorporates controls such as media coverage of climate change, the occurrence of climate-related disasters like hurricanes and wildfires, and the impact of major political events, including the 2020 presidential election. The negative association between COVID-19 severity and climate change worry was strongest in 2020, weakening progressively in 2021 and 2022.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"volume\":\"106 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102728\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002117\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002117","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

新冠肺炎疫情是否转移了公众对气候变化问题的注意力,是近年来学者们存在分歧的一个话题。已经出现了两种相互竞争的理论:“有限的担忧池”,它断言对大流行的担忧超过了对气候变化的担忧;“有限的关注池”,它认为尽管对气候变化的关注已经减弱,但担忧仍然保持稳定甚至加剧——这与影响泛化理论一致。调查研究似乎更有力地支持后一种假设。在本研究中,我们调查了这一理论论述,并通过对2018年至2022年与气候变化相关的近2400万条Twitter帖子的新数据集进行情感内容分析,重新审视了这些结论。通过使用三个词汇——liwc、NRC Lex和vade——我们发现,在COVID-19激增的同时,气候变化推文中恐惧、焦虑和其他负面情绪的表达有所减少。我们的日常分析纳入了诸如媒体对气候变化的报道,飓风和野火等与气候有关的灾害的发生,以及包括2020年总统大选在内的重大政治事件的影响等控制。COVID-19严重程度与气候变化担忧之间的负相关关系在2020年最强,在2021年和2022年逐渐减弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Finite pool of worry and emotions in climate change tweets during COVID-19
Whether the COVID-19 pandemic diverted public attention away from the issue of climate change is a topic that divided scholars in recent years. Two competing theories have emerged: the ‘finite pool of worry’, which asserts that concerns over the pandemic have overshadowed those for climate change, and the ‘finite pool of attention’, which argues that although attention to climate change has waned, worry has remained steady or even intensified – in line with affect generalization theory. Survey research appears to support the latter hypothesis more strongly. In this study, we investigate this theoretical discourse and revisit these conclusions by conducting an emotional content analysis on a novel dataset of nearly 24 million Twitter posts related to climate change from 2018 to 2022. Employing three lexicons—LIWC, NRC Lex, and VADER—we find that climate change tweets exhibit a decline in expressions of fear, anxiety, and other negative emotions concurrent with COVID-19 surges. Our daily-level analysis incorporates controls such as media coverage of climate change, the occurrence of climate-related disasters like hurricanes and wildfires, and the impact of major political events, including the 2020 presidential election. The negative association between COVID-19 severity and climate change worry was strongest in 2020, weakening progressively in 2021 and 2022.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
140
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信