堪萨斯大学站立平衡量表在急性至亚急性脑卒中患者中使用两种外锚的最小临床重要差异

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Asall Kim, Younji Kim, Myungki Ji, Jae-Young Lim
{"title":"堪萨斯大学站立平衡量表在急性至亚急性脑卒中患者中使用两种外锚的最小临床重要差异","authors":"Asall Kim, Younji Kim, Myungki Ji, Jae-Young Lim","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2025.2547293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke-related balance impairments reduce independence, making accurate assessment vital for rehabilitation. However, research on the minimal clinically important difference for the Kansas University Standing Balance Scale (KUSBS) is limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study determined the minimal clinically important difference for the KUSBS based on reduced assistance in walking and daily living activities for inpatients with acute-to-subacute stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 407 inpatients diagnosed with acute-to-subacute stroke who were referred to the rehabilitation department between 2016 and 2022. Clinical outcomes - including the Kansas University Standing Balance Scale (KUSBS), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Functional Ambulation Category (FAC), and Modified Barthel Index (MBI) - were assessed at both admission and discharge. The minimal clinically important difference was determined using anchor-based methods, including receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The minimal clinically important difference for the KUSBS was 0.5 for both anchors; for the BBS, it ranged from 5.5 to 9.5. Subgroup analysis demonstrated statistical significance for patients requiring assistance with activities. Multivariate analysis indicated that functional improvements varied according to the initial functional levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The minimal clinically important difference for the KUSBS was 0.5 for patients requiring walking assistance and 1.5 for those needing maximal assistance with daily activities. Alternative balance assessment tools may be more suitable for patients who do not require assistance. Our study findings emphasize the importance of incorporating qualitative balance assessment tools, such as the KUSBS, alongside traditional quantitative measures, such as the BBS, to provide a more comprehensive evaluation of post-stroke balance function.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimal clinically important difference of the Kansas University standing balance scale in patients with acute-to-subacute stroke using two external anchors.\",\"authors\":\"Asall Kim, Younji Kim, Myungki Ji, Jae-Young Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09593985.2025.2547293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke-related balance impairments reduce independence, making accurate assessment vital for rehabilitation. However, research on the minimal clinically important difference for the Kansas University Standing Balance Scale (KUSBS) is limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study determined the minimal clinically important difference for the KUSBS based on reduced assistance in walking and daily living activities for inpatients with acute-to-subacute stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 407 inpatients diagnosed with acute-to-subacute stroke who were referred to the rehabilitation department between 2016 and 2022. Clinical outcomes - including the Kansas University Standing Balance Scale (KUSBS), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Functional Ambulation Category (FAC), and Modified Barthel Index (MBI) - were assessed at both admission and discharge. The minimal clinically important difference was determined using anchor-based methods, including receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The minimal clinically important difference for the KUSBS was 0.5 for both anchors; for the BBS, it ranged from 5.5 to 9.5. Subgroup analysis demonstrated statistical significance for patients requiring assistance with activities. Multivariate analysis indicated that functional improvements varied according to the initial functional levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The minimal clinically important difference for the KUSBS was 0.5 for patients requiring walking assistance and 1.5 for those needing maximal assistance with daily activities. Alternative balance assessment tools may be more suitable for patients who do not require assistance. Our study findings emphasize the importance of incorporating qualitative balance assessment tools, such as the KUSBS, alongside traditional quantitative measures, such as the BBS, to provide a more comprehensive evaluation of post-stroke balance function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2025.2547293\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2025.2547293","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:卒中相关的平衡障碍降低了独立性,因此准确的评估对康复至关重要。然而,关于堪萨斯大学站立平衡量表(KUSBS)的最小临床重要差异的研究是有限的。目的:本研究确定了急性至亚急性脑卒中住院患者基于行走和日常生活活动辅助减少的KUSBS的最小临床重要差异。方法:本回顾性研究纳入2016年至2022年间转介康复科诊断为急性至亚急性脑卒中的住院患者407例。临床结果-包括堪萨斯大学站立平衡量表(KUSBS), Berg平衡量表(BBS),功能活动分类(FAC)和改良Barthel指数(MBI) -在入院和出院时进行评估。使用基于锚定的方法确定最小临床重要差异,包括受试者工作特征曲线分析。结果:两种锚的KUSBS最小临床重要差异为0.5;而BBS的评分则在5.5到9.5之间。亚组分析显示需要辅助活动的患者有统计学意义。多变量分析表明,根据初始功能水平,功能改善有所不同。结论:对于需要行走辅助的患者,KUSBS的最小临床重要差异为0.5,对于需要最大程度日常活动辅助的患者,最小临床重要差异为1.5。替代平衡评估工具可能更适合不需要帮助的患者。我们的研究结果强调了将定性平衡评估工具(如KUSBS)与传统的定量测量(如BBS)结合起来的重要性,以提供更全面的卒中后平衡功能评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Minimal clinically important difference of the Kansas University standing balance scale in patients with acute-to-subacute stroke using two external anchors.

Background: Stroke-related balance impairments reduce independence, making accurate assessment vital for rehabilitation. However, research on the minimal clinically important difference for the Kansas University Standing Balance Scale (KUSBS) is limited.

Objectives: This study determined the minimal clinically important difference for the KUSBS based on reduced assistance in walking and daily living activities for inpatients with acute-to-subacute stroke.

Methods: This retrospective study included 407 inpatients diagnosed with acute-to-subacute stroke who were referred to the rehabilitation department between 2016 and 2022. Clinical outcomes - including the Kansas University Standing Balance Scale (KUSBS), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Functional Ambulation Category (FAC), and Modified Barthel Index (MBI) - were assessed at both admission and discharge. The minimal clinically important difference was determined using anchor-based methods, including receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

Results: The minimal clinically important difference for the KUSBS was 0.5 for both anchors; for the BBS, it ranged from 5.5 to 9.5. Subgroup analysis demonstrated statistical significance for patients requiring assistance with activities. Multivariate analysis indicated that functional improvements varied according to the initial functional levels.

Conclusion: The minimal clinically important difference for the KUSBS was 0.5 for patients requiring walking assistance and 1.5 for those needing maximal assistance with daily activities. Alternative balance assessment tools may be more suitable for patients who do not require assistance. Our study findings emphasize the importance of incorporating qualitative balance assessment tools, such as the KUSBS, alongside traditional quantitative measures, such as the BBS, to provide a more comprehensive evaluation of post-stroke balance function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信