基于酰胺质子转移成像的多参数MRI在评价局部晚期宫颈癌同步放化疗疗效中的价值。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Chongshuang Yang , Hasyma Abu Hassan , Nur Farhayu Omar , Tze Hui Soo , Ahmad Shuib bin Yahaya , Tianliang Shi , Zhihong Qin , Min Wu , Changfu Yang
{"title":"基于酰胺质子转移成像的多参数MRI在评价局部晚期宫颈癌同步放化疗疗效中的价值。","authors":"Chongshuang Yang ,&nbsp;Hasyma Abu Hassan ,&nbsp;Nur Farhayu Omar ,&nbsp;Tze Hui Soo ,&nbsp;Ahmad Shuib bin Yahaya ,&nbsp;Tianliang Shi ,&nbsp;Zhihong Qin ,&nbsp;Min Wu ,&nbsp;Changfu Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.mri.2025.110507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the utility of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based on amide proton transfer (APT) imaging in assessing the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for locally advanced cervical cancer (CC).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed clinical and imaging data from pathologically confirmed CC patients treated at our hospital between January 2020 and May 2025. All patients underwent conventional MRI, APT imaging, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) prior to treatment. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, APT values, and semi-quantitative parameters from DCE-MRI were measured. Treatment response following CCRT was evaluated based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR) were classified as the remission group (RG), while stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) were grouped as the non-remission group (NRG). Differences in APT values, ADC values, and semi-quantitative parameters of DCE-MRI between RG and NRG were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of APT, ADC, semi-quantitative parameters of DCE-MRI, and their combinations in predicting CCRT response. The Delong test was used for statistical comparison of AUCs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 43 patients were included, with 5 (11.63 %) achieving CR, 31 (72.09 %) achieving PR, 5 (11.63 %) classified as SD, and 2 (4.65 %) as PD, resulting in a local control rate of 95.35 %. The APT value in the RG was significantly lower than in the NRG (3.13 % ± 0.24 % vs. 3.36 % ± 0.16 %, <em>P</em> = 0.02), while the ADC value was significantly higher [(0.89 ± 0.11) × 10<sup>−3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s vs. (0.80 ± 0.07) × 10<sup>−3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s, <em>P</em> = 0.034]. The NRG showed significantly higher values in wash-in rate (WIR) compared to the RG (<em>P</em> = 0.035). The AUC of APT in differentiating RG from NRG was higher than that of ADC and WIR, but the differences were not statistically significant (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). Moreover, the combined use of APT, ADC, and WIR increased the AUC to 0.893, which was significantly higher than that of WIR alone (<em>P</em> = 0.024).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Multi-parametric MRI based on APT imaging holds promise for predicting CCRT outcomes in locally advanced CC. The combination of APT, ADC, and WIR improves diagnostic accuracy compared to individual parameters, offering a potential non-invasive tool for guiding clinical management after CCRT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18165,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic resonance imaging","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 110507"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The value of multi-parameters MRI based on amide proton transfer imaging in evaluating the efficacy of concurrent radiochemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer\",\"authors\":\"Chongshuang Yang ,&nbsp;Hasyma Abu Hassan ,&nbsp;Nur Farhayu Omar ,&nbsp;Tze Hui Soo ,&nbsp;Ahmad Shuib bin Yahaya ,&nbsp;Tianliang Shi ,&nbsp;Zhihong Qin ,&nbsp;Min Wu ,&nbsp;Changfu Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mri.2025.110507\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the utility of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based on amide proton transfer (APT) imaging in assessing the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for locally advanced cervical cancer (CC).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed clinical and imaging data from pathologically confirmed CC patients treated at our hospital between January 2020 and May 2025. All patients underwent conventional MRI, APT imaging, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) prior to treatment. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, APT values, and semi-quantitative parameters from DCE-MRI were measured. Treatment response following CCRT was evaluated based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR) were classified as the remission group (RG), while stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) were grouped as the non-remission group (NRG). Differences in APT values, ADC values, and semi-quantitative parameters of DCE-MRI between RG and NRG were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of APT, ADC, semi-quantitative parameters of DCE-MRI, and their combinations in predicting CCRT response. The Delong test was used for statistical comparison of AUCs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 43 patients were included, with 5 (11.63 %) achieving CR, 31 (72.09 %) achieving PR, 5 (11.63 %) classified as SD, and 2 (4.65 %) as PD, resulting in a local control rate of 95.35 %. The APT value in the RG was significantly lower than in the NRG (3.13 % ± 0.24 % vs. 3.36 % ± 0.16 %, <em>P</em> = 0.02), while the ADC value was significantly higher [(0.89 ± 0.11) × 10<sup>−3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s vs. (0.80 ± 0.07) × 10<sup>−3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s, <em>P</em> = 0.034]. The NRG showed significantly higher values in wash-in rate (WIR) compared to the RG (<em>P</em> = 0.035). The AUC of APT in differentiating RG from NRG was higher than that of ADC and WIR, but the differences were not statistically significant (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). Moreover, the combined use of APT, ADC, and WIR increased the AUC to 0.893, which was significantly higher than that of WIR alone (<em>P</em> = 0.024).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Multi-parametric MRI based on APT imaging holds promise for predicting CCRT outcomes in locally advanced CC. The combination of APT, ADC, and WIR improves diagnostic accuracy compared to individual parameters, offering a potential non-invasive tool for guiding clinical management after CCRT.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magnetic resonance imaging\",\"volume\":\"123 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110507\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magnetic resonance imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0730725X25001912\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic resonance imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0730725X25001912","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨基于酰胺质子转移(APT)成像的多参数磁共振成像(MRI)在评估局部晚期宫颈癌同步放化疗(CCRT)疗效中的应用价值。材料和方法:我们回顾性分析2020年1月至2025年5月在我院治疗的病理证实的CC患者的临床和影像学资料。所有患者在治疗前均接受常规MRI、APT成像和动态对比增强MRI (DCE-MRI)检查。测量DCE-MRI的表观扩散系数(ADC)值、APT值及半定量参数。根据实体肿瘤反应评价标准(RECIST)评估CCRT后的治疗反应。完全缓解组(CR)和部分缓解组(PR)分为缓解组(RG),病情稳定组(SD)和病情进展组(PD)分为非缓解组(NRG)。分析RG与NRG在APT值、ADC值及DCE-MRI半定量参数上的差异。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估APT、ADC、DCE-MRI半定量参数及其组合预测CCRT反应的敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)。采用Delong检验对auc进行统计学比较。结果:共纳入43例患者,其中CR 5例(11.63 %),PR 31例(72.09 %),SD 5例(11.63 %),PD 2例(4.65 %),局部控制率95.35 %。恰当的值在RG明显低于NRG(3.13 % ±0.24  % 3.36 vs % ±0.16  %,P = 0.02),在ADC值明显高于[(0.89 ±0.11 ) × 三分 平方毫米/秒和(0.80 ±0.07 ) × 三分 平方毫米/ s, P = 0.034]。NRG组的洗入率(WIR)显著高于RG组(P = 0.035)。APT在RG与NRG鉴别中的AUC高于ADC和WIR,但差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。此外,APT、ADC和WIR联合使用的AUC为0.893,显著高于单独使用WIR (P = 0.024)。结论:基于APT成像的多参数MRI有望预测局部晚期CC的CCRT结果,与单个参数相比,APT、ADC和WIR的结合提高了诊断准确性,为指导CCRT后的临床管理提供了一种潜在的无创工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The value of multi-parameters MRI based on amide proton transfer imaging in evaluating the efficacy of concurrent radiochemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer

Objective

To evaluate the utility of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based on amide proton transfer (APT) imaging in assessing the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for locally advanced cervical cancer (CC).

Materials and methods

We retrospectively analyzed clinical and imaging data from pathologically confirmed CC patients treated at our hospital between January 2020 and May 2025. All patients underwent conventional MRI, APT imaging, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) prior to treatment. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, APT values, and semi-quantitative parameters from DCE-MRI were measured. Treatment response following CCRT was evaluated based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR) were classified as the remission group (RG), while stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) were grouped as the non-remission group (NRG). Differences in APT values, ADC values, and semi-quantitative parameters of DCE-MRI between RG and NRG were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of APT, ADC, semi-quantitative parameters of DCE-MRI, and their combinations in predicting CCRT response. The Delong test was used for statistical comparison of AUCs.

Results

A total of 43 patients were included, with 5 (11.63 %) achieving CR, 31 (72.09 %) achieving PR, 5 (11.63 %) classified as SD, and 2 (4.65 %) as PD, resulting in a local control rate of 95.35 %. The APT value in the RG was significantly lower than in the NRG (3.13 % ± 0.24 % vs. 3.36 % ± 0.16 %, P = 0.02), while the ADC value was significantly higher [(0.89 ± 0.11) × 10−3 mm2/s vs. (0.80 ± 0.07) × 10−3 mm2/s, P = 0.034]. The NRG showed significantly higher values in wash-in rate (WIR) compared to the RG (P = 0.035). The AUC of APT in differentiating RG from NRG was higher than that of ADC and WIR, but the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Moreover, the combined use of APT, ADC, and WIR increased the AUC to 0.893, which was significantly higher than that of WIR alone (P = 0.024).

Conclusion

Multi-parametric MRI based on APT imaging holds promise for predicting CCRT outcomes in locally advanced CC. The combination of APT, ADC, and WIR improves diagnostic accuracy compared to individual parameters, offering a potential non-invasive tool for guiding clinical management after CCRT.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic resonance imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the first international multidisciplinary journal encompassing physical, life, and clinical science investigations as they relate to the development and use of magnetic resonance imaging. MRI is dedicated to both basic research, technological innovation and applications, providing a single forum for communication among radiologists, physicists, chemists, biochemists, biologists, engineers, internists, pathologists, physiologists, computer scientists, and mathematicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信