{"title":"考虑性能保证的电动汽车电池租赁策略","authors":"Wei Xie , Guoxin Han , Yuanguang Zhong","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2025.103398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Electric vehicles (EVs) have gained significant popularity due to their eco-friendly benefits. However, EV batteries are capital-intensive and their performance deteriorates with usage, which undermines their market competitiveness compared to gas-powered cars. To address this issue, EV manufacturers have introduced battery-leasing services (BLS) to reduce the upfront cost for consumers and have provided a performance-guaranteed warranty policy (PGWP). Nevertheless, the high upfront production costs and maintenance expenses associated with PGWP impose a financial burden and risk on manufacturers. Therefore, based on real-world cases, this study introduces a battery asset company (BAC) to explore related pricing strategies for providing BLSs under PGWP and to examine the impact of various collaboration models with BAC on manufacturers. The findings reveal that the relationship between the total discount factors of consumers and firms significantly influences the pricing strategies of EV bodies and BLS. When consumers’ total discount factor is relatively low, the “razor-blade effect” emerges. Furthermore, we identify that the cost advantages of BAC are the primary drivers of manufacturers’ collaboration strategies. Interestingly, although the collaboration model where manufacturers sell batteries to BAC while retaining BLS operational responsibilities is theoretically the least favorable option, it can yield the highest short-term returns and cash flow protection when battery maintenance costs are relatively high. Additionally, under cost-revenue ratio constraints, this collaboration model can also effectively alleviate manufacturers’ financial pressure, enabling them to achieve maximum profitability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 103398"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Battery-leasing strategies for electric vehicles considering a performance guarantee\",\"authors\":\"Wei Xie , Guoxin Han , Yuanguang Zhong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.omega.2025.103398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Electric vehicles (EVs) have gained significant popularity due to their eco-friendly benefits. However, EV batteries are capital-intensive and their performance deteriorates with usage, which undermines their market competitiveness compared to gas-powered cars. To address this issue, EV manufacturers have introduced battery-leasing services (BLS) to reduce the upfront cost for consumers and have provided a performance-guaranteed warranty policy (PGWP). Nevertheless, the high upfront production costs and maintenance expenses associated with PGWP impose a financial burden and risk on manufacturers. Therefore, based on real-world cases, this study introduces a battery asset company (BAC) to explore related pricing strategies for providing BLSs under PGWP and to examine the impact of various collaboration models with BAC on manufacturers. The findings reveal that the relationship between the total discount factors of consumers and firms significantly influences the pricing strategies of EV bodies and BLS. When consumers’ total discount factor is relatively low, the “razor-blade effect” emerges. Furthermore, we identify that the cost advantages of BAC are the primary drivers of manufacturers’ collaboration strategies. Interestingly, although the collaboration model where manufacturers sell batteries to BAC while retaining BLS operational responsibilities is theoretically the least favorable option, it can yield the highest short-term returns and cash flow protection when battery maintenance costs are relatively high. Additionally, under cost-revenue ratio constraints, this collaboration model can also effectively alleviate manufacturers’ financial pressure, enabling them to achieve maximum profitability.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19529,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Omega-international Journal of Management Science\",\"volume\":\"138 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103398\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Omega-international Journal of Management Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048325001240\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048325001240","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
Battery-leasing strategies for electric vehicles considering a performance guarantee
Electric vehicles (EVs) have gained significant popularity due to their eco-friendly benefits. However, EV batteries are capital-intensive and their performance deteriorates with usage, which undermines their market competitiveness compared to gas-powered cars. To address this issue, EV manufacturers have introduced battery-leasing services (BLS) to reduce the upfront cost for consumers and have provided a performance-guaranteed warranty policy (PGWP). Nevertheless, the high upfront production costs and maintenance expenses associated with PGWP impose a financial burden and risk on manufacturers. Therefore, based on real-world cases, this study introduces a battery asset company (BAC) to explore related pricing strategies for providing BLSs under PGWP and to examine the impact of various collaboration models with BAC on manufacturers. The findings reveal that the relationship between the total discount factors of consumers and firms significantly influences the pricing strategies of EV bodies and BLS. When consumers’ total discount factor is relatively low, the “razor-blade effect” emerges. Furthermore, we identify that the cost advantages of BAC are the primary drivers of manufacturers’ collaboration strategies. Interestingly, although the collaboration model where manufacturers sell batteries to BAC while retaining BLS operational responsibilities is theoretically the least favorable option, it can yield the highest short-term returns and cash flow protection when battery maintenance costs are relatively high. Additionally, under cost-revenue ratio constraints, this collaboration model can also effectively alleviate manufacturers’ financial pressure, enabling them to achieve maximum profitability.
期刊介绍:
Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.