Mosab I. Tabash , Umaid A. Sheikh , David Roubaud , Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al-Faryan , Oksana Grebinevych
{"title":"股票市场分位数是否会干预商品期货和外汇市场收益中正负冲击的传导?","authors":"Mosab I. Tabash , Umaid A. Sheikh , David Roubaud , Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al-Faryan , Oksana Grebinevych","doi":"10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This is first study to examine the asymmetric effects of positive and negative innovations in commodity futures (oil and gold) and foreign exchange market returns across the quantiles of stock returns of all of the 22 developed economies, while accounting for different investment horizons (short- and long-term). Methodologically, we used an integrated framework by combining the Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag (NARDL) model with quantile regression and thereby utilized the Quantile-based NARDL (QNARDL) approach. Further, for the COVID-19 subsample, we augmented the QNARDL model by incorporating control variables such as pandemic-related news sentiment and disaggregated positive and negative returns from the U.S. non-financial sector. Overall, the empirical results indicated that equity market sensitivities to macroeconomic and non-macroeconomic disturbances are conditional upon four critical dimensions: (1) prevailing stock market regimes (bullish, bearish, or neutral); (2) investment horizon (short- vs. long-term); (3) asymmetric transmission mechanisms of negative and positive shocks that originate from forex markets and commodity futures, and (4) temporal segmentation (pre-, during-, and post-COVID-19 periods).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51430,"journal":{"name":"Research in International Business and Finance","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 103081"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do stock market quantiles intervene in the transmission of positive and negative shocks in the commodity futures and forex market returns?\",\"authors\":\"Mosab I. Tabash , Umaid A. Sheikh , David Roubaud , Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al-Faryan , Oksana Grebinevych\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This is first study to examine the asymmetric effects of positive and negative innovations in commodity futures (oil and gold) and foreign exchange market returns across the quantiles of stock returns of all of the 22 developed economies, while accounting for different investment horizons (short- and long-term). Methodologically, we used an integrated framework by combining the Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag (NARDL) model with quantile regression and thereby utilized the Quantile-based NARDL (QNARDL) approach. Further, for the COVID-19 subsample, we augmented the QNARDL model by incorporating control variables such as pandemic-related news sentiment and disaggregated positive and negative returns from the U.S. non-financial sector. Overall, the empirical results indicated that equity market sensitivities to macroeconomic and non-macroeconomic disturbances are conditional upon four critical dimensions: (1) prevailing stock market regimes (bullish, bearish, or neutral); (2) investment horizon (short- vs. long-term); (3) asymmetric transmission mechanisms of negative and positive shocks that originate from forex markets and commodity futures, and (4) temporal segmentation (pre-, during-, and post-COVID-19 periods).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in International Business and Finance\",\"volume\":\"79 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103081\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in International Business and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027553192500337X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in International Business and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027553192500337X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Do stock market quantiles intervene in the transmission of positive and negative shocks in the commodity futures and forex market returns?
This is first study to examine the asymmetric effects of positive and negative innovations in commodity futures (oil and gold) and foreign exchange market returns across the quantiles of stock returns of all of the 22 developed economies, while accounting for different investment horizons (short- and long-term). Methodologically, we used an integrated framework by combining the Nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag (NARDL) model with quantile regression and thereby utilized the Quantile-based NARDL (QNARDL) approach. Further, for the COVID-19 subsample, we augmented the QNARDL model by incorporating control variables such as pandemic-related news sentiment and disaggregated positive and negative returns from the U.S. non-financial sector. Overall, the empirical results indicated that equity market sensitivities to macroeconomic and non-macroeconomic disturbances are conditional upon four critical dimensions: (1) prevailing stock market regimes (bullish, bearish, or neutral); (2) investment horizon (short- vs. long-term); (3) asymmetric transmission mechanisms of negative and positive shocks that originate from forex markets and commodity futures, and (4) temporal segmentation (pre-, during-, and post-COVID-19 periods).
期刊介绍:
Research in International Business and Finance (RIBAF) seeks to consolidate its position as a premier scholarly vehicle of academic finance. The Journal publishes high quality, insightful, well-written papers that explore current and new issues in international finance. Papers that foster dialogue, innovation, and intellectual risk-taking in financial studies; as well as shed light on the interaction between finance and broader societal concerns are particularly appreciated. The Journal welcomes submissions that seek to expand the boundaries of academic finance and otherwise challenge the discipline. Papers studying finance using a variety of methodologies; as well as interdisciplinary studies will be considered for publication. Papers that examine topical issues using extensive international data sets are welcome. Single-country studies can also be considered for publication provided that they develop novel methodological and theoretical approaches or fall within the Journal''s priority themes. It is especially important that single-country studies communicate to the reader why the particular chosen country is especially relevant to the issue being investigated. [...] The scope of topics that are most interesting to RIBAF readers include the following: -Financial markets and institutions -Financial practices and sustainability -The impact of national culture on finance -The impact of formal and informal institutions on finance -Privatizations, public financing, and nonprofit issues in finance -Interdisciplinary financial studies -Finance and international development -International financial crises and regulation -Financialization studies -International financial integration and architecture -Behavioral aspects in finance -Consumer finance -Methodologies and conceptualization issues related to finance