二十年来护士主导的血液肿瘤学研究:绘图回顾。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Maura Dowling, Orlaith Hernon, Vanessa Boland, Ciara Nic Giolla Chomhaill, Teresa Meenaghan, Sarah Connolly, Fidelma Hackett, Caroline McCaughey, Barry Quinn, Tracy King, Bethany Maynard, Stavroula Chante, Geraldine Walpole, Orlaith Cormican, Karen Campbell
{"title":"二十年来护士主导的血液肿瘤学研究:绘图回顾。","authors":"Maura Dowling, Orlaith Hernon, Vanessa Boland, Ciara Nic Giolla Chomhaill, Teresa Meenaghan, Sarah Connolly, Fidelma Hackett, Caroline McCaughey, Barry Quinn, Tracy King, Bethany Maynard, Stavroula Chante, Geraldine Walpole, Orlaith Cormican, Karen Campbell","doi":"10.1016/j.soncn.2025.151958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Nurse-led research in hemato-oncology is diverse, but its nature and extent are unknown. This review aimed to identify and map nurse-led research in hemato-oncology over 20 years (2004-2024) to highlight under-researched gaps, describe methodological and topic trends, and allow comparison between geographical regions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mapping review was undertaken following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. Five databases were systematically searched: Medline (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase (Elsevier), ProQuest, and Scopus (Elsevier). Independent screening and data extraction were undertaken on the web-based platform Covidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,916 sources were included (n = 1,618 journal publications; n = 262 published conference abstracts; n = 36 doctoral dissertations). The most common methodology was non-experimental (60.5%), followed by qualitative (19.2%), experimental (12.5%), evidence syntheses (6.3%), and mixed methods (1.5%). Most of the studies were undertaken by nurses working in the USA, followed by nurses in China, Türkiye, Canada, Australia and Iran. Studies in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult settings represented 42.4% of the included studies. A high number of studies undertaken in hematopoietic stem cell transplant settings were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The number of research studies led by nurses in hemato-oncology settings, particularly in the USA, is upward. Most of the research undertaken has adopted a descriptive quantitative methodology. More interventional research is needed to contribute meaningfully to scientific knowledge that enhances the quality of care for individuals affected by blood cancer across the disease trajectory.</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing practice: </strong>To support more nurse-led interventional research, strategic investment in mentorship, protected research time, interdisciplinary collaboration, structured clinical-academic posts, and funding pathways is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54253,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"151958"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Twenty Years of Nurse-Led Research in Hemato-Oncology: A Mapping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Maura Dowling, Orlaith Hernon, Vanessa Boland, Ciara Nic Giolla Chomhaill, Teresa Meenaghan, Sarah Connolly, Fidelma Hackett, Caroline McCaughey, Barry Quinn, Tracy King, Bethany Maynard, Stavroula Chante, Geraldine Walpole, Orlaith Cormican, Karen Campbell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soncn.2025.151958\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Nurse-led research in hemato-oncology is diverse, but its nature and extent are unknown. This review aimed to identify and map nurse-led research in hemato-oncology over 20 years (2004-2024) to highlight under-researched gaps, describe methodological and topic trends, and allow comparison between geographical regions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mapping review was undertaken following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. Five databases were systematically searched: Medline (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase (Elsevier), ProQuest, and Scopus (Elsevier). Independent screening and data extraction were undertaken on the web-based platform Covidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,916 sources were included (n = 1,618 journal publications; n = 262 published conference abstracts; n = 36 doctoral dissertations). The most common methodology was non-experimental (60.5%), followed by qualitative (19.2%), experimental (12.5%), evidence syntheses (6.3%), and mixed methods (1.5%). Most of the studies were undertaken by nurses working in the USA, followed by nurses in China, Türkiye, Canada, Australia and Iran. Studies in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult settings represented 42.4% of the included studies. A high number of studies undertaken in hematopoietic stem cell transplant settings were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The number of research studies led by nurses in hemato-oncology settings, particularly in the USA, is upward. Most of the research undertaken has adopted a descriptive quantitative methodology. More interventional research is needed to contribute meaningfully to scientific knowledge that enhances the quality of care for individuals affected by blood cancer across the disease trajectory.</p><p><strong>Implications for nursing practice: </strong>To support more nurse-led interventional research, strategic investment in mentorship, protected research time, interdisciplinary collaboration, structured clinical-academic posts, and funding pathways is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Oncology Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"151958\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Oncology Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2025.151958\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2025.151958","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:护士主导的血液肿瘤学研究是多种多样的,但其性质和程度是未知的。本综述旨在确定和绘制20年来(2004-2024年)护士主导的血液肿瘤学研究,以突出研究不足的差距,描述方法和主题趋势,并允许在地理区域之间进行比较。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目,范围审查(PRISMA-ScR)清单进行制图审查。系统检索了5个数据库:Medline (Ovid)、CINAHL (EBSCOhost)、Embase (Elsevier)、ProQuest和Scopus (Elsevier)。在网络平台covid - ence上进行独立筛选和数据提取。结果:共纳入1,916个来源(n = 1,618篇期刊出版物;N = 262篇已发表的会议摘要;N = 36篇博士论文)。最常见的方法为非实验法(60.5%),其次为定性法(19.2%)、实验法(12.5%)、证据综合法(6.3%)和混合法(1.5%)。大多数研究是由在美国工作的护士进行的,其次是中国、土耳其、加拿大、澳大利亚和伊朗的护士。儿童、青少年和年轻人的研究占纳入研究的42.4%。在造血干细胞移植环境中进行了大量的研究。结论:由护士领导的血液肿瘤学研究的数量正在上升,尤其是在美国。所进行的大多数研究都采用了描述性定量方法。需要更多的介入性研究,为科学知识做出有意义的贡献,从而提高整个疾病轨迹中受血癌影响的个体的护理质量。对护理实践的影响:为了支持更多护士主导的介入研究,需要在指导、保护研究时间、跨学科合作、结构化临床学术职位和资助途径方面进行战略投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Twenty Years of Nurse-Led Research in Hemato-Oncology: A Mapping Review.

Objectives: Nurse-led research in hemato-oncology is diverse, but its nature and extent are unknown. This review aimed to identify and map nurse-led research in hemato-oncology over 20 years (2004-2024) to highlight under-researched gaps, describe methodological and topic trends, and allow comparison between geographical regions.

Methods: A mapping review was undertaken following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. Five databases were systematically searched: Medline (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase (Elsevier), ProQuest, and Scopus (Elsevier). Independent screening and data extraction were undertaken on the web-based platform Covidence.

Results: A total of 1,916 sources were included (n = 1,618 journal publications; n = 262 published conference abstracts; n = 36 doctoral dissertations). The most common methodology was non-experimental (60.5%), followed by qualitative (19.2%), experimental (12.5%), evidence syntheses (6.3%), and mixed methods (1.5%). Most of the studies were undertaken by nurses working in the USA, followed by nurses in China, Türkiye, Canada, Australia and Iran. Studies in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult settings represented 42.4% of the included studies. A high number of studies undertaken in hematopoietic stem cell transplant settings were found.

Conclusions: The number of research studies led by nurses in hemato-oncology settings, particularly in the USA, is upward. Most of the research undertaken has adopted a descriptive quantitative methodology. More interventional research is needed to contribute meaningfully to scientific knowledge that enhances the quality of care for individuals affected by blood cancer across the disease trajectory.

Implications for nursing practice: To support more nurse-led interventional research, strategic investment in mentorship, protected research time, interdisciplinary collaboration, structured clinical-academic posts, and funding pathways is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Oncology Nursing
Seminars in Oncology Nursing Nursing-Oncology (nursing)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Oncology Nursing is a unique international journal published six times a year. Each issue offers a multi-faceted overview of a single cancer topic from a selection of expert review articles and disseminates oncology nursing research relevant to patient care, nursing education, management, and policy development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信