意大利物理治疗师在治疗腰痛患者时是否遵循循证指南?横断面调查。

IF 1.6 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Ryan D Muller, Samuel M Schut, Paolo Perna, Alberto Ferrara, Daniele Banchetto, Joshua R Zadro
{"title":"意大利物理治疗师在治疗腰痛患者时是否遵循循证指南?横断面调查。","authors":"Ryan D Muller, Samuel M Schut, Paolo Perna, Alberto Ferrara, Daniele Banchetto, Joshua R Zadro","doi":"10.1002/msc.70164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Guideline-recommended management of low back pain (LBP) is associated with improved patient outcomes and costs. This study aimed to assess Italian physiotherapists' attitudes towards and adherence to LBP clinical practice guidelines (CPGs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an online cross-sectional survey of Italian physiotherapists. Participants' demographics, attitudes towards, and familiarity with CPGs were collected. Six vignettes of patients with LBP were presented. For each, participants selected management options from a pre-specified list. Management options were categorised as recommended, not recommended, and no recommendation based on CPG recommendations and systematic reviews. Ordinal logistic regression assessed associations between participant characteristics and the number of vignettes for which recommended and not recommended care options were selected (stratified by non-specific LBP and red flag vignettes).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 272 participants completing the demographic section of the survey, 142 completed all vignettes. Care that was recommended, not recommended, and had no recommendation was selected by 87%, 32%, and 93% of participants on average in the six vignettes, respectively. Working in a hospital setting was associated with a reduced likelihood of selecting recommended care for non-specific LBP (coefficient: -1.28; 95% CI: -2.20, -0.36). Stronger self-reported familiarity with three published CPGs was associated with decreased likelihood of selecting not recommended care but was not associated with selecting recommended care for non-specific LBP. All other variables were not associated with selecting recommended and not recommended care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Physiotherapists commonly selected recommended care options for patients with LBP, yet there remains considerable scope to reduce selection of care which is not recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":46945,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Care","volume":"23 3","pages":"e70164"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Italian Physiotherapists Follow Evidence-Based Guidelines When Managing Patients With Low Back Pain? A Cross-Sectional Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Ryan D Muller, Samuel M Schut, Paolo Perna, Alberto Ferrara, Daniele Banchetto, Joshua R Zadro\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/msc.70164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Guideline-recommended management of low back pain (LBP) is associated with improved patient outcomes and costs. This study aimed to assess Italian physiotherapists' attitudes towards and adherence to LBP clinical practice guidelines (CPGs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an online cross-sectional survey of Italian physiotherapists. Participants' demographics, attitudes towards, and familiarity with CPGs were collected. Six vignettes of patients with LBP were presented. For each, participants selected management options from a pre-specified list. Management options were categorised as recommended, not recommended, and no recommendation based on CPG recommendations and systematic reviews. Ordinal logistic regression assessed associations between participant characteristics and the number of vignettes for which recommended and not recommended care options were selected (stratified by non-specific LBP and red flag vignettes).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 272 participants completing the demographic section of the survey, 142 completed all vignettes. Care that was recommended, not recommended, and had no recommendation was selected by 87%, 32%, and 93% of participants on average in the six vignettes, respectively. Working in a hospital setting was associated with a reduced likelihood of selecting recommended care for non-specific LBP (coefficient: -1.28; 95% CI: -2.20, -0.36). Stronger self-reported familiarity with three published CPGs was associated with decreased likelihood of selecting not recommended care but was not associated with selecting recommended care for non-specific LBP. All other variables were not associated with selecting recommended and not recommended care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Physiotherapists commonly selected recommended care options for patients with LBP, yet there remains considerable scope to reduce selection of care which is not recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Musculoskeletal Care\",\"volume\":\"23 3\",\"pages\":\"e70164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Musculoskeletal Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.70164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.70164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导论:指南推荐的腰痛(LBP)管理与改善患者预后和成本相关。本研究旨在评估意大利物理治疗师对LBP临床实践指南(CPGs)的态度和依从性。方法:我们对意大利物理治疗师进行了在线横断面调查。收集了参与者的人口统计、对cpg的态度和熟悉程度。本文报道了6例腰痛患者。对于每个项目,参与者从预先指定的列表中选择管理选项。根据CPG建议和系统评价,将管理方案分为推荐、不推荐和不推荐。有序逻辑回归评估参与者特征与选择推荐和不推荐护理方案的小插曲数量之间的关联(通过非特异性LBP和红旗小插曲分层)。结果:在完成人口统计部分调查的272名参与者中,142人完成了所有小插曲。在六个小插曲中,平均分别有87%、32%和93%的参与者选择了推荐、不推荐和不推荐的治疗方案。在医院工作与选择推荐治疗非特异性腰痛的可能性降低相关(系数:-1.28;95% ci: -2.20, -0.36)。更强的自我报告熟悉三个已发表的CPGs与选择不推荐治疗的可能性降低相关,但与选择非特异性LBP推荐治疗的可能性无关。所有其他变量与选择推荐和不推荐的护理无关。结论:物理治疗师通常为腰痛患者选择推荐的护理方案,但仍有相当大的余地减少不推荐的护理方案的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do Italian Physiotherapists Follow Evidence-Based Guidelines When Managing Patients With Low Back Pain? A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Introduction: Guideline-recommended management of low back pain (LBP) is associated with improved patient outcomes and costs. This study aimed to assess Italian physiotherapists' attitudes towards and adherence to LBP clinical practice guidelines (CPGs).

Methods: We conducted an online cross-sectional survey of Italian physiotherapists. Participants' demographics, attitudes towards, and familiarity with CPGs were collected. Six vignettes of patients with LBP were presented. For each, participants selected management options from a pre-specified list. Management options were categorised as recommended, not recommended, and no recommendation based on CPG recommendations and systematic reviews. Ordinal logistic regression assessed associations between participant characteristics and the number of vignettes for which recommended and not recommended care options were selected (stratified by non-specific LBP and red flag vignettes).

Results: Of the 272 participants completing the demographic section of the survey, 142 completed all vignettes. Care that was recommended, not recommended, and had no recommendation was selected by 87%, 32%, and 93% of participants on average in the six vignettes, respectively. Working in a hospital setting was associated with a reduced likelihood of selecting recommended care for non-specific LBP (coefficient: -1.28; 95% CI: -2.20, -0.36). Stronger self-reported familiarity with three published CPGs was associated with decreased likelihood of selecting not recommended care but was not associated with selecting recommended care for non-specific LBP. All other variables were not associated with selecting recommended and not recommended care.

Conclusions: Physiotherapists commonly selected recommended care options for patients with LBP, yet there remains considerable scope to reduce selection of care which is not recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Care
Musculoskeletal Care RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Care is a peer-reviewed journal for all health professionals committed to the clinical delivery of high quality care for people with musculoskeletal conditions and providing knowledge to support decision making by professionals, patients and policy makers. This journal publishes papers on original research, applied research, review articles and clinical guidelines. Regular topics include patient education, psychological and social impact, patient experiences of health care, clinical up dates and the effectiveness of therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信