Irena Grubor, Bryndís Baldvinsdóttir, Murtadha Al-Hesnawi, Henrietta Nittby Redebrandt
{"title":"与被动硬膜下引流相比，主动硬膜下引流治疗慢性硬膜下血肿的再手术风险降低。","authors":"Irena Grubor, Bryndís Baldvinsdóttir, Murtadha Al-Hesnawi, Henrietta Nittby Redebrandt","doi":"10.3171/2025.4.JNS242409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common cause of morbidity in the older population and the incidence of CSDH is likely to increase in upcoming years due to the increasing age of the population. Surgical intervention is the cornerstone of treatment, but trials have shown conflicting results regarding the optimal type of surgical drainage. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between patients with CSDH who were surgically treated with active subgaleal drainage versus passive subdural drainage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center cohort study included patients who underwent surgery for CSDH from 2020 to 2022. In a neurosurgical department in Lund, Sweden, the clinical routine changed from use of a passive subdural drain to an active subgaleal drain during this period. Data were collected from patient medical records and analyzed using univariable analysis followed by multivariable logistic regression analysis. The primary outcome was reoperation for recurrent hematoma within 3 months. Secondary outcomes were postoperative morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 452 patients (331 male, median age 78 years) included in the analysis, 3 were lost to follow-up, leaving 230 patients who received passive subdural drainage and 219 patients who received active subgaleal drainage for outcomes assessment. The risk of recurrent surgery for CSDH within 3 months was significantly lower in the active subgaleal drain group (12.7%) compared with the passive subdural drain group (20.1%) (p = 0.022). Regarding secondary outcomes, no statistically significant differences were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Risk of recurrent CSDH requiring surgery was lower in patients who received active subgaleal drainage compared with those who received passive subdural drainage, with no increased risk of postoperative complications. These findings support use of the active subgaleal drain system for CSDH surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reduced risk of reoperation of chronic subdural hematoma in patients treated with active subgaleal drainage compared with passive subdural drainage.\",\"authors\":\"Irena Grubor, Bryndís Baldvinsdóttir, Murtadha Al-Hesnawi, Henrietta Nittby Redebrandt\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2025.4.JNS242409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common cause of morbidity in the older population and the incidence of CSDH is likely to increase in upcoming years due to the increasing age of the population. Surgical intervention is the cornerstone of treatment, but trials have shown conflicting results regarding the optimal type of surgical drainage. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between patients with CSDH who were surgically treated with active subgaleal drainage versus passive subdural drainage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center cohort study included patients who underwent surgery for CSDH from 2020 to 2022. In a neurosurgical department in Lund, Sweden, the clinical routine changed from use of a passive subdural drain to an active subgaleal drain during this period. Data were collected from patient medical records and analyzed using univariable analysis followed by multivariable logistic regression analysis. The primary outcome was reoperation for recurrent hematoma within 3 months. Secondary outcomes were postoperative morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 452 patients (331 male, median age 78 years) included in the analysis, 3 were lost to follow-up, leaving 230 patients who received passive subdural drainage and 219 patients who received active subgaleal drainage for outcomes assessment. The risk of recurrent surgery for CSDH within 3 months was significantly lower in the active subgaleal drain group (12.7%) compared with the passive subdural drain group (20.1%) (p = 0.022). Regarding secondary outcomes, no statistically significant differences were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Risk of recurrent CSDH requiring surgery was lower in patients who received active subgaleal drainage compared with those who received passive subdural drainage, with no increased risk of postoperative complications. These findings support use of the active subgaleal drain system for CSDH surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.4.JNS242409\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.4.JNS242409","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reduced risk of reoperation of chronic subdural hematoma in patients treated with active subgaleal drainage compared with passive subdural drainage.
Objective: Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common cause of morbidity in the older population and the incidence of CSDH is likely to increase in upcoming years due to the increasing age of the population. Surgical intervention is the cornerstone of treatment, but trials have shown conflicting results regarding the optimal type of surgical drainage. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between patients with CSDH who were surgically treated with active subgaleal drainage versus passive subdural drainage.
Methods: This retrospective single-center cohort study included patients who underwent surgery for CSDH from 2020 to 2022. In a neurosurgical department in Lund, Sweden, the clinical routine changed from use of a passive subdural drain to an active subgaleal drain during this period. Data were collected from patient medical records and analyzed using univariable analysis followed by multivariable logistic regression analysis. The primary outcome was reoperation for recurrent hematoma within 3 months. Secondary outcomes were postoperative morbidity and mortality.
Results: Of 452 patients (331 male, median age 78 years) included in the analysis, 3 were lost to follow-up, leaving 230 patients who received passive subdural drainage and 219 patients who received active subgaleal drainage for outcomes assessment. The risk of recurrent surgery for CSDH within 3 months was significantly lower in the active subgaleal drain group (12.7%) compared with the passive subdural drain group (20.1%) (p = 0.022). Regarding secondary outcomes, no statistically significant differences were found.
Conclusions: Risk of recurrent CSDH requiring surgery was lower in patients who received active subgaleal drainage compared with those who received passive subdural drainage, with no increased risk of postoperative complications. These findings support use of the active subgaleal drain system for CSDH surgery.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
