近年来,单单位非亲属脐带血移植后的早期死亡率有所改善吗?日本2003年至2022年全国登记数据分析。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Takaaki Konuma, Junya Kanda, Naoyuki Uchida, Masatsugu Tanaka, Fumihiko Kimura, Hideki Nakasone, Yasufumi Uehara, Masahito Tokunaga, Masako Toyosaki, Shigesaburo Miyakoshi, Noriko Doki, Kazuya Ishiwata, Hikaru Kobayashi, Yasushi Onishi, Yasuji Kozai, Koji Kato, Fumihiko Ishimaru, Takahiro Fukuda, Yoshiko Atsuta, Satoshi Takahashi
{"title":"近年来,单单位非亲属脐带血移植后的早期死亡率有所改善吗?日本2003年至2022年全国登记数据分析。","authors":"Takaaki Konuma, Junya Kanda, Naoyuki Uchida, Masatsugu Tanaka, Fumihiko Kimura, Hideki Nakasone, Yasufumi Uehara, Masahito Tokunaga, Masako Toyosaki, Shigesaburo Miyakoshi, Noriko Doki, Kazuya Ishiwata, Hikaru Kobayashi, Yasushi Onishi, Yasuji Kozai, Koji Kato, Fumihiko Ishimaru, Takahiro Fukuda, Yoshiko Atsuta, Satoshi Takahashi","doi":"10.1111/bjh.70099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Unrelated single-unit cord blood transplantation (CBT) is a valuable alternative donor source for patients without matched related or unrelated donors. Although initial concerns included limited cell dose, delayed haematopoietic recovery and higher early mortality, advancements in transplant practices may have led to improved outcomes. However, it remains uncertain whether these improvements extend to the most recent years. We conducted a nationwide, registry-based retrospective study of 15 816 patients who received unrelated single-unit CBT in Japan and analysed across four time periods: 2003-2007, 2008-2012, 2013-2017 and 2018-2022. Overall survival (OS) improved significantly across time periods, with 3-year OS increasing from 38.8% (2003-2007) to 54.4% (2018-2022; p < 0.001). Similarly, 100-day non-relapse mortality declined from 19.6% to 9.5% (p < 0.001). Neutrophil and platelet engraftment rates also rose steadily, reaching 89.6% and 78.0%, respectively, in the most recent period. The most notable improvement in 100-day OS occurred among patients aged ≥60 years. Early mortality within 100 days due to bacterial and fungal infections, graft failure, haemorrhage and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) significantly decreased over time. This study shows clear and consistent improvements in transplant outcomes, especially in the most recent 5-year period.</p>","PeriodicalId":135,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Haematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Has early mortality following single-unit unrelated cord blood transplantation improved in recent years? A nationwide registry data analysis from 2003 to 2022 in Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Takaaki Konuma, Junya Kanda, Naoyuki Uchida, Masatsugu Tanaka, Fumihiko Kimura, Hideki Nakasone, Yasufumi Uehara, Masahito Tokunaga, Masako Toyosaki, Shigesaburo Miyakoshi, Noriko Doki, Kazuya Ishiwata, Hikaru Kobayashi, Yasushi Onishi, Yasuji Kozai, Koji Kato, Fumihiko Ishimaru, Takahiro Fukuda, Yoshiko Atsuta, Satoshi Takahashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bjh.70099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Unrelated single-unit cord blood transplantation (CBT) is a valuable alternative donor source for patients without matched related or unrelated donors. Although initial concerns included limited cell dose, delayed haematopoietic recovery and higher early mortality, advancements in transplant practices may have led to improved outcomes. However, it remains uncertain whether these improvements extend to the most recent years. We conducted a nationwide, registry-based retrospective study of 15 816 patients who received unrelated single-unit CBT in Japan and analysed across four time periods: 2003-2007, 2008-2012, 2013-2017 and 2018-2022. Overall survival (OS) improved significantly across time periods, with 3-year OS increasing from 38.8% (2003-2007) to 54.4% (2018-2022; p < 0.001). Similarly, 100-day non-relapse mortality declined from 19.6% to 9.5% (p < 0.001). Neutrophil and platelet engraftment rates also rose steadily, reaching 89.6% and 78.0%, respectively, in the most recent period. The most notable improvement in 100-day OS occurred among patients aged ≥60 years. Early mortality within 100 days due to bacterial and fungal infections, graft failure, haemorrhage and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) significantly decreased over time. This study shows clear and consistent improvements in transplant outcomes, especially in the most recent 5-year period.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Haematology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Haematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.70099\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Haematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.70099","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

非亲属单单位脐带血移植(CBT)对于没有匹配亲属或非亲属供体的患者是一种有价值的替代供体来源。尽管最初的担忧包括有限的细胞剂量,延迟的造血恢复和较高的早期死亡率,移植实践的进步可能导致改善的结果。然而,目前还不确定这些改善是否会延续到最近几年。我们在日本开展了一项全国性的、基于登记的回顾性研究,对15816名接受不相关单单位CBT的患者进行了分析,并在2003-2007年、2008-2012年、2013-2017年和2018-2022年四个时间段进行了分析。总生存率(OS)在不同时期显著提高,3年生存率从38.8%(2003-2007年)增加到54.4%(2018-2022年);p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Has early mortality following single-unit unrelated cord blood transplantation improved in recent years? A nationwide registry data analysis from 2003 to 2022 in Japan.

Unrelated single-unit cord blood transplantation (CBT) is a valuable alternative donor source for patients without matched related or unrelated donors. Although initial concerns included limited cell dose, delayed haematopoietic recovery and higher early mortality, advancements in transplant practices may have led to improved outcomes. However, it remains uncertain whether these improvements extend to the most recent years. We conducted a nationwide, registry-based retrospective study of 15 816 patients who received unrelated single-unit CBT in Japan and analysed across four time periods: 2003-2007, 2008-2012, 2013-2017 and 2018-2022. Overall survival (OS) improved significantly across time periods, with 3-year OS increasing from 38.8% (2003-2007) to 54.4% (2018-2022; p < 0.001). Similarly, 100-day non-relapse mortality declined from 19.6% to 9.5% (p < 0.001). Neutrophil and platelet engraftment rates also rose steadily, reaching 89.6% and 78.0%, respectively, in the most recent period. The most notable improvement in 100-day OS occurred among patients aged ≥60 years. Early mortality within 100 days due to bacterial and fungal infections, graft failure, haemorrhage and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) significantly decreased over time. This study shows clear and consistent improvements in transplant outcomes, especially in the most recent 5-year period.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.60%
发文量
565
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Haematology publishes original research papers in clinical, laboratory and experimental haematology. The Journal also features annotations, reviews, short reports, images in haematology and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信