Kyle Fiore Law , Zhaoquan Wang , Christian T. Elbaek , Antoinette Fage-Butler , Panagiotis Mitkidis , Theofilos Gkinopoulos , Ewa Szumowska , Gabriela Czarnek , Adrian Dominik Wojcik , Simon Fulgsang , Dominika Jurgiel , Małgorzata Dzimińska , Izabela Warwas , Michal Parzuchowski , Olga Bialobrzeska , Mariola Paruzel-Czachura , Katarzyna Pypno-Blajda , Myrto Pantazi , Grégoire Lits , Bram Spruyt , Stylianos Syropoulos
{"title":"对子孙后代的责任和减缓气候变化:欧洲亲环境主义预测因素的跨国研究","authors":"Kyle Fiore Law , Zhaoquan Wang , Christian T. Elbaek , Antoinette Fage-Butler , Panagiotis Mitkidis , Theofilos Gkinopoulos , Ewa Szumowska , Gabriela Czarnek , Adrian Dominik Wojcik , Simon Fulgsang , Dominika Jurgiel , Małgorzata Dzimińska , Izabela Warwas , Michal Parzuchowski , Olga Bialobrzeska , Mariola Paruzel-Czachura , Katarzyna Pypno-Blajda , Myrto Pantazi , Grégoire Lits , Bram Spruyt , Stylianos Syropoulos","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Feeling personally responsible for climate change is a key predictor of pro-environmental action. Recent U.S.-based research finds that people more strongly endorse responsibility to protect future generations (RFG) than responsibility to reduce climate change (RCC). Here, we conceptually replicated this finding across six European countries and tested whether RFG and RCC predicted climate-relevant attitudes beyond the U.S. context. Consistent with prior work, RFG was endorsed slightly more than RCC, and both types of responsibility significantly predicted support for climate policy. Additionally, RFG and RCC were positively associated with negative emotional responses to climate change and with attributions of increasing severe weather events, both past and anticipated, to climate change. These results suggest that even in less polarized political environments, responsibility to future generations is more widely endorsed than responsibility to mitigate climate change. Still, both constructs appear psychologically meaningful and help explain variation in climate concern and policy support.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 102729"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Responsibility for future generations and climate change mitigation: A cross-national study of predictors of pro-environmentalism in Europe\",\"authors\":\"Kyle Fiore Law , Zhaoquan Wang , Christian T. Elbaek , Antoinette Fage-Butler , Panagiotis Mitkidis , Theofilos Gkinopoulos , Ewa Szumowska , Gabriela Czarnek , Adrian Dominik Wojcik , Simon Fulgsang , Dominika Jurgiel , Małgorzata Dzimińska , Izabela Warwas , Michal Parzuchowski , Olga Bialobrzeska , Mariola Paruzel-Czachura , Katarzyna Pypno-Blajda , Myrto Pantazi , Grégoire Lits , Bram Spruyt , Stylianos Syropoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Feeling personally responsible for climate change is a key predictor of pro-environmental action. Recent U.S.-based research finds that people more strongly endorse responsibility to protect future generations (RFG) than responsibility to reduce climate change (RCC). Here, we conceptually replicated this finding across six European countries and tested whether RFG and RCC predicted climate-relevant attitudes beyond the U.S. context. Consistent with prior work, RFG was endorsed slightly more than RCC, and both types of responsibility significantly predicted support for climate policy. Additionally, RFG and RCC were positively associated with negative emotional responses to climate change and with attributions of increasing severe weather events, both past and anticipated, to climate change. These results suggest that even in less polarized political environments, responsibility to future generations is more widely endorsed than responsibility to mitigate climate change. Still, both constructs appear psychologically meaningful and help explain variation in climate concern and policy support.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"volume\":\"106 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102729\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002129\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425002129","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Responsibility for future generations and climate change mitigation: A cross-national study of predictors of pro-environmentalism in Europe
Feeling personally responsible for climate change is a key predictor of pro-environmental action. Recent U.S.-based research finds that people more strongly endorse responsibility to protect future generations (RFG) than responsibility to reduce climate change (RCC). Here, we conceptually replicated this finding across six European countries and tested whether RFG and RCC predicted climate-relevant attitudes beyond the U.S. context. Consistent with prior work, RFG was endorsed slightly more than RCC, and both types of responsibility significantly predicted support for climate policy. Additionally, RFG and RCC were positively associated with negative emotional responses to climate change and with attributions of increasing severe weather events, both past and anticipated, to climate change. These results suggest that even in less polarized political environments, responsibility to future generations is more widely endorsed than responsibility to mitigate climate change. Still, both constructs appear psychologically meaningful and help explain variation in climate concern and policy support.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space