Hanlin Yin , Wanyi Lin , Chenhan Jia , Chaoyu Gu , Zhangyi Zhao , Fenglin Wu , Qianqian Li , Yan Ma , Xinyu Li , Zhe Ding , Xuesong Liu , Xinyi Liu , Le Zhang , Liangjing Lu
{"title":"抗ro52和抗ro60抗体双重阳性与系统性硬化症中更大的器官受累和疾病进展有关","authors":"Hanlin Yin , Wanyi Lin , Chenhan Jia , Chaoyu Gu , Zhangyi Zhao , Fenglin Wu , Qianqian Li , Yan Ma , Xinyu Li , Zhe Ding , Xuesong Liu , Xinyi Liu , Le Zhang , Liangjing Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.semarthrit.2025.152810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To investigate the distinct and combined effects of anti-Ro52/TRIM21 and anti-Ro60/SSA antibodies on the clinical features and prognosis of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A single-center observational study was conducted using data from the Renji Scleroderma Longitudinal Cohort (Renji-SLOC), including 379 SSc patients with at least 1 year of follow-up. The patients were categorized into four groups based on serological status: double-negative (Ro52<sup>−</sup>/Ro60<sup>−</sup>), isolated anti-Ro52/TRIM21 positive (Ro52<sup>+</sup>), isolated anti-Ro60/SSA positive (Ro60<sup>+</sup>), double-positive (Ro52<sup>+</sup>/Ro60<sup>+</sup>). Clinical features and disease progression were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression and survival analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 379 patients, 12.7% (n=48) were double-positive. Notably, 43.6% of Ro52-positive patients were also Ro60-positive, and 62.3% of Ro60-positive patients were Ro52-positive, indicating significant co-occurrence. Double-positive patients exhibited significantly higher rates of ILD (79.2%), PAH (25.0%), digital ulcers (41.7%), and gastrointestinal symptoms (79.2%). Multivariable analysis confirmed that double positivity independently increased risks of ILD (adjusted OR=2.27, 95% CI=1.02-5.14), PAH (adjusted OR=2.24, 95% CI=1.03-4.84), digital ulcers (adjusted OR=3.12, 95% CI=1.57-6.20), and gastrointestinal involvement (adjusted OR=2.28, 95% CI=1.08-4.81). Survival analysis demonstrated significantly worse progression-free survival in double-positive patients (adjusted HR=1.90, 95% CI=1.24-2.90 for overall progression; adjusted HR=2.20, 95% CI=1.36-3.57 for ILD progression, both p<0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Dual positivity for anti-Ro52 and anti-Ro60 antibodies identifies a distinct SSc subgroup with severe organ involvement and accelerated disease progression, particularly ILD. These findings highlight the prognostic value of combined antibody testing and underscore the need for vigilant monitoring in double-positive patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21715,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 152810"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dual positivity for Anti-Ro52 and Anti-Ro60 antibodies is linked to greater organ involvement and disease progression in systemic sclerosis\",\"authors\":\"Hanlin Yin , Wanyi Lin , Chenhan Jia , Chaoyu Gu , Zhangyi Zhao , Fenglin Wu , Qianqian Li , Yan Ma , Xinyu Li , Zhe Ding , Xuesong Liu , Xinyi Liu , Le Zhang , Liangjing Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.semarthrit.2025.152810\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To investigate the distinct and combined effects of anti-Ro52/TRIM21 and anti-Ro60/SSA antibodies on the clinical features and prognosis of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A single-center observational study was conducted using data from the Renji Scleroderma Longitudinal Cohort (Renji-SLOC), including 379 SSc patients with at least 1 year of follow-up. The patients were categorized into four groups based on serological status: double-negative (Ro52<sup>−</sup>/Ro60<sup>−</sup>), isolated anti-Ro52/TRIM21 positive (Ro52<sup>+</sup>), isolated anti-Ro60/SSA positive (Ro60<sup>+</sup>), double-positive (Ro52<sup>+</sup>/Ro60<sup>+</sup>). Clinical features and disease progression were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression and survival analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 379 patients, 12.7% (n=48) were double-positive. Notably, 43.6% of Ro52-positive patients were also Ro60-positive, and 62.3% of Ro60-positive patients were Ro52-positive, indicating significant co-occurrence. Double-positive patients exhibited significantly higher rates of ILD (79.2%), PAH (25.0%), digital ulcers (41.7%), and gastrointestinal symptoms (79.2%). Multivariable analysis confirmed that double positivity independently increased risks of ILD (adjusted OR=2.27, 95% CI=1.02-5.14), PAH (adjusted OR=2.24, 95% CI=1.03-4.84), digital ulcers (adjusted OR=3.12, 95% CI=1.57-6.20), and gastrointestinal involvement (adjusted OR=2.28, 95% CI=1.08-4.81). Survival analysis demonstrated significantly worse progression-free survival in double-positive patients (adjusted HR=1.90, 95% CI=1.24-2.90 for overall progression; adjusted HR=2.20, 95% CI=1.36-3.57 for ILD progression, both p<0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Dual positivity for anti-Ro52 and anti-Ro60 antibodies identifies a distinct SSc subgroup with severe organ involvement and accelerated disease progression, particularly ILD. These findings highlight the prognostic value of combined antibody testing and underscore the need for vigilant monitoring in double-positive patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism\",\"volume\":\"74 \",\"pages\":\"Article 152810\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049017225001817\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049017225001817","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dual positivity for Anti-Ro52 and Anti-Ro60 antibodies is linked to greater organ involvement and disease progression in systemic sclerosis
Objectives
To investigate the distinct and combined effects of anti-Ro52/TRIM21 and anti-Ro60/SSA antibodies on the clinical features and prognosis of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc).
Methods
A single-center observational study was conducted using data from the Renji Scleroderma Longitudinal Cohort (Renji-SLOC), including 379 SSc patients with at least 1 year of follow-up. The patients were categorized into four groups based on serological status: double-negative (Ro52−/Ro60−), isolated anti-Ro52/TRIM21 positive (Ro52+), isolated anti-Ro60/SSA positive (Ro60+), double-positive (Ro52+/Ro60+). Clinical features and disease progression were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression and survival analysis.
Results
Among 379 patients, 12.7% (n=48) were double-positive. Notably, 43.6% of Ro52-positive patients were also Ro60-positive, and 62.3% of Ro60-positive patients were Ro52-positive, indicating significant co-occurrence. Double-positive patients exhibited significantly higher rates of ILD (79.2%), PAH (25.0%), digital ulcers (41.7%), and gastrointestinal symptoms (79.2%). Multivariable analysis confirmed that double positivity independently increased risks of ILD (adjusted OR=2.27, 95% CI=1.02-5.14), PAH (adjusted OR=2.24, 95% CI=1.03-4.84), digital ulcers (adjusted OR=3.12, 95% CI=1.57-6.20), and gastrointestinal involvement (adjusted OR=2.28, 95% CI=1.08-4.81). Survival analysis demonstrated significantly worse progression-free survival in double-positive patients (adjusted HR=1.90, 95% CI=1.24-2.90 for overall progression; adjusted HR=2.20, 95% CI=1.36-3.57 for ILD progression, both p<0.05).
Conclusion
Dual positivity for anti-Ro52 and anti-Ro60 antibodies identifies a distinct SSc subgroup with severe organ involvement and accelerated disease progression, particularly ILD. These findings highlight the prognostic value of combined antibody testing and underscore the need for vigilant monitoring in double-positive patients.
期刊介绍:
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism provides access to the highest-quality clinical, therapeutic and translational research about arthritis, rheumatology and musculoskeletal disorders that affect the joints and connective tissue. Each bimonthly issue includes articles giving you the latest diagnostic criteria, consensus statements, systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as clinical and translational research studies. Read this journal for the latest groundbreaking research and to gain insights from scientists and clinicians on the management and treatment of musculoskeletal and autoimmune rheumatologic diseases. The journal is of interest to rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, internal medicine physicians, immunologists and specialists in bone and mineral metabolism.