急性冠脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后大出血与院内主要不良心血管事件的关系

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Özkan Bekler, Alparslan Kurtul, Emirhan Hancıoğlu, Süleyman Diren Kazan, Fatih Şen
{"title":"急性冠脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后大出血与院内主要不良心血管事件的关系","authors":"Özkan Bekler, Alparslan Kurtul, Emirhan Hancıoğlu, Süleyman Diren Kazan, Fatih Şen","doi":"10.1055/a-2663-7161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Major bleeding (MB) is a serious complication in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although its association with long-term adverse outcomes is well documented, the impact of in-hospital MB on early cardiovascular prognosis remains incompletely characterized.To investigate the association between in-hospital MB and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with ACS treated with PCI.We conducted a retrospective cohort study on 829 consecutive ACS patients who underwent successful PCI between January 2021 and December 2023. MB was defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5 bleeding events. MACE was defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, urgent target vessel revascularization, or new-onset/decompensated heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <30%. Clinical data and outcomes were extracted from hospital records and independently adjudicated.MB occurred in 4.5% of patients (<i>n</i> = 37). The incidence of in-hospital MACE was significantly higher among patients with MB compared to those without (40.5% vs. 8.1%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression, MB was the strongest independent predictor of in-hospital MACE (OR: 12.43, 95% CI: 3.43-44.98, <i>p</i> < 0.001), followed by reduced LVEF (OR per % increase: 0.794, 95% CI: 0.747-0.843, <i>p</i> < 0.001), age, and white blood cell count.In-hospital MB is a potent and independent predictor of early MACE in patients with ACS undergoing PCI. These findings emphasize the need for careful risk stratification, bleeding prevention strategies, and individualized antithrombotic management in this high-risk population.</p>","PeriodicalId":55074,"journal":{"name":"Hamostaseologie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Major Bleeding and In-Hospital Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndromes.\",\"authors\":\"Özkan Bekler, Alparslan Kurtul, Emirhan Hancıoğlu, Süleyman Diren Kazan, Fatih Şen\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2663-7161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Major bleeding (MB) is a serious complication in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although its association with long-term adverse outcomes is well documented, the impact of in-hospital MB on early cardiovascular prognosis remains incompletely characterized.To investigate the association between in-hospital MB and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with ACS treated with PCI.We conducted a retrospective cohort study on 829 consecutive ACS patients who underwent successful PCI between January 2021 and December 2023. MB was defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5 bleeding events. MACE was defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, urgent target vessel revascularization, or new-onset/decompensated heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <30%. Clinical data and outcomes were extracted from hospital records and independently adjudicated.MB occurred in 4.5% of patients (<i>n</i> = 37). The incidence of in-hospital MACE was significantly higher among patients with MB compared to those without (40.5% vs. 8.1%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression, MB was the strongest independent predictor of in-hospital MACE (OR: 12.43, 95% CI: 3.43-44.98, <i>p</i> < 0.001), followed by reduced LVEF (OR per % increase: 0.794, 95% CI: 0.747-0.843, <i>p</i> < 0.001), age, and white blood cell count.In-hospital MB is a potent and independent predictor of early MACE in patients with ACS undergoing PCI. These findings emphasize the need for careful risk stratification, bleeding prevention strategies, and individualized antithrombotic management in this high-risk population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hamostaseologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hamostaseologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2663-7161\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hamostaseologie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2663-7161","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大出血(MB)是急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的严重并发症。尽管其与长期不良后果的关联已被充分证明,但住院MB对早期心血管预后的影响仍不完全明确。探讨行PCI治疗的ACS患者住院MB与主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的关系。我们对829名在2021年1月至2023年12月期间连续成功接受PCI治疗的ACS患者进行了回顾性队列研究。MB定义为出血学术研究联盟(BARC) 3型或5型出血事件。MACE被定义为全因死亡率、复发性心肌梗死、缺血性卒中、紧急靶血管重建术或新发/失代偿性心力衰竭伴左室射血分数(LVEF) n = 37的综合指标。MB患者的住院MACE发生率明显高于无MB患者(40.5% vs 8.1%, p p p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association Between Major Bleeding and In-Hospital Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Coronary Syndromes.

Major bleeding (MB) is a serious complication in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although its association with long-term adverse outcomes is well documented, the impact of in-hospital MB on early cardiovascular prognosis remains incompletely characterized.To investigate the association between in-hospital MB and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with ACS treated with PCI.We conducted a retrospective cohort study on 829 consecutive ACS patients who underwent successful PCI between January 2021 and December 2023. MB was defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5 bleeding events. MACE was defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, urgent target vessel revascularization, or new-onset/decompensated heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <30%. Clinical data and outcomes were extracted from hospital records and independently adjudicated.MB occurred in 4.5% of patients (n = 37). The incidence of in-hospital MACE was significantly higher among patients with MB compared to those without (40.5% vs. 8.1%, p < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression, MB was the strongest independent predictor of in-hospital MACE (OR: 12.43, 95% CI: 3.43-44.98, p < 0.001), followed by reduced LVEF (OR per % increase: 0.794, 95% CI: 0.747-0.843, p < 0.001), age, and white blood cell count.In-hospital MB is a potent and independent predictor of early MACE in patients with ACS undergoing PCI. These findings emphasize the need for careful risk stratification, bleeding prevention strategies, and individualized antithrombotic management in this high-risk population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hamostaseologie
Hamostaseologie HEMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
62
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hämostaseologie is an interdisciplinary specialist journal on the complex topics of haemorrhages and thromboembolism and is aimed not only at haematologists, but also at a wide range of specialists from clinic and practice. The readership consequently includes both specialists for internal medicine as well as for surgical diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信