Sofie Langergaard, Rhiannon Evans, Jane Andreasen, Kirsten Schultz Petersen, Charlotte Overgaard
{"title":"解决丹麦老年中心老年人的社会孤立问题:工作人员对提供干预措施的接受程度。","authors":"Sofie Langergaard, Rhiannon Evans, Jane Andreasen, Kirsten Schultz Petersen, Charlotte Overgaard","doi":"10.1093/heapro/daaf136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social isolation is a significant challenge among the aging population. A newly developed intervention was implemented in municipal senior centres to support new users to become part of the social community, with the intention of reducing social isolation. The intervention consisted of a starting conversation with staff members, a 'buddy' from existing users and monthly follow-up conversations. This study aims to explore the acceptability of the intervention among senior centre staff members as part of a process evaluation, drawing upon the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability by Sekhon et al. Data were collected through observation and interviews with senior centre staff members (N = 10) involved in the implementation and delivery of the intervention. Data analysis was inspired by thematic analysis. The results indicated a decline in acceptability during the intervention period. Underlying reasons were organized in three main themes: 'Why do it this way, when I can do it my way'; 'I don't like to place these demands on the user'; and 'We just had to prioritise'. Overall, participants suggested a preference for a noninstitutional approach to welcoming new users and felt the intervention misaligned with the organizational goals to improve health. High staff turnover and workload further negatively affected intervention acceptability. This study highlights the complexities of implementing interventions in senior centres, where staff hesitance and a misalignment with values can affect intervention acceptability.</p>","PeriodicalId":54256,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion International","volume":"40 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing social isolation among older people in Danish senior centres: staff acceptability of intervention delivery.\",\"authors\":\"Sofie Langergaard, Rhiannon Evans, Jane Andreasen, Kirsten Schultz Petersen, Charlotte Overgaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/heapro/daaf136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Social isolation is a significant challenge among the aging population. A newly developed intervention was implemented in municipal senior centres to support new users to become part of the social community, with the intention of reducing social isolation. The intervention consisted of a starting conversation with staff members, a 'buddy' from existing users and monthly follow-up conversations. This study aims to explore the acceptability of the intervention among senior centre staff members as part of a process evaluation, drawing upon the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability by Sekhon et al. Data were collected through observation and interviews with senior centre staff members (N = 10) involved in the implementation and delivery of the intervention. Data analysis was inspired by thematic analysis. The results indicated a decline in acceptability during the intervention period. Underlying reasons were organized in three main themes: 'Why do it this way, when I can do it my way'; 'I don't like to place these demands on the user'; and 'We just had to prioritise'. Overall, participants suggested a preference for a noninstitutional approach to welcoming new users and felt the intervention misaligned with the organizational goals to improve health. High staff turnover and workload further negatively affected intervention acceptability. This study highlights the complexities of implementing interventions in senior centres, where staff hesitance and a misalignment with values can affect intervention acceptability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion International\",\"volume\":\"40 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaf136\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaf136","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Addressing social isolation among older people in Danish senior centres: staff acceptability of intervention delivery.
Social isolation is a significant challenge among the aging population. A newly developed intervention was implemented in municipal senior centres to support new users to become part of the social community, with the intention of reducing social isolation. The intervention consisted of a starting conversation with staff members, a 'buddy' from existing users and monthly follow-up conversations. This study aims to explore the acceptability of the intervention among senior centre staff members as part of a process evaluation, drawing upon the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability by Sekhon et al. Data were collected through observation and interviews with senior centre staff members (N = 10) involved in the implementation and delivery of the intervention. Data analysis was inspired by thematic analysis. The results indicated a decline in acceptability during the intervention period. Underlying reasons were organized in three main themes: 'Why do it this way, when I can do it my way'; 'I don't like to place these demands on the user'; and 'We just had to prioritise'. Overall, participants suggested a preference for a noninstitutional approach to welcoming new users and felt the intervention misaligned with the organizational goals to improve health. High staff turnover and workload further negatively affected intervention acceptability. This study highlights the complexities of implementing interventions in senior centres, where staff hesitance and a misalignment with values can affect intervention acceptability.
期刊介绍:
Health Promotion International contains refereed original articles, reviews, and debate articles on major themes and innovations in the health promotion field. In line with the remits of the series of global conferences on health promotion the journal expressly invites contributions from sectors beyond health. These may include education, employment, government, the media, industry, environmental agencies, and community networks. As the thought journal of the international health promotion movement we seek in particular theoretical, methodological and activist advances to the field. Thus, the journal provides a unique focal point for articles of high quality that describe not only theories and concepts, research projects and policy formulation, but also planned and spontaneous activities, organizational change, as well as social and environmental development.