72个低、中、高收入市场基本药物的价格和可负担性。

IF 11.3 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Olivier J Wouters, Cyprien Denolle, Jinru Wei, Irene Papanicolas
{"title":"72个低、中、高收入市场基本药物的价格和可负担性。","authors":"Olivier J Wouters, Cyprien Denolle, Jinru Wei, Irene Papanicolas","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.2043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Little is known about how the prices and affordability of medicines included on the World Health Organization's Model List of Essential Medicines vary across the globe.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the list prices and affordability of essential medicines across high-, middle-, and low-income markets.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>This cross-sectional study examined data from 2022 on list prices and volumes of 549 essential medicines in 72 high-, middle-, and low-income markets (covering 87 countries). These data were obtained from IQVIA. The statistical analyses were performed between August 2024 and March 2025.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Laspeyres price indices were used to compare average drug prices across countries, both in nominal and purchasing power parity-adjusted terms. The affordability of 8 essential medicines, used to treat major causes of death and disability globally, was assessed by calculating how many days of minimum wage would be required to pay for 1 month of treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The availability of essential medicines ranged from 225 (41%) in Kuwait to 438 (80%) in Germany (base country). After accounting for purchasing power parities, prices of essential medicines in Lebanon were, on average, 18.1% of those in Germany (Lebanon price index, 18.1 vs Germany price index, 100), while average prices in the US were 3.0 times higher than in Germany (US price index, 298.2). A positive association was observed between countries' gross domestic product per capita (expressed in logarithmic terms) and nominal drug prices (R = 0.30; P = .01), indicating that richer countries generally had higher drug prices. However, when adjusting for the purchasing power of different currencies, an inverse association was observed (R = -0.35; P = .003), suggesting that richer countries had lower real prices. Drug affordability, as measured by the number of days' minimum wage needed to purchase a month's treatment, varied widely, with median affordability highest in Europe and the Western Pacific, and lowest in Africa and Southeast Asia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The results of this cross-sectional analysis showed significant variation in the prices and affordability of 549 essential medicines across 72 markets in 2022. Strategies to promote equitable drug prices and improve drug affordability are urgently needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"6 8","pages":"e252043"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12357183/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prices and Affordability of Essential Medicines in 72 Low-, Middle-, and High-Income Markets.\",\"authors\":\"Olivier J Wouters, Cyprien Denolle, Jinru Wei, Irene Papanicolas\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.2043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Little is known about how the prices and affordability of medicines included on the World Health Organization's Model List of Essential Medicines vary across the globe.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the list prices and affordability of essential medicines across high-, middle-, and low-income markets.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>This cross-sectional study examined data from 2022 on list prices and volumes of 549 essential medicines in 72 high-, middle-, and low-income markets (covering 87 countries). These data were obtained from IQVIA. The statistical analyses were performed between August 2024 and March 2025.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Laspeyres price indices were used to compare average drug prices across countries, both in nominal and purchasing power parity-adjusted terms. The affordability of 8 essential medicines, used to treat major causes of death and disability globally, was assessed by calculating how many days of minimum wage would be required to pay for 1 month of treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The availability of essential medicines ranged from 225 (41%) in Kuwait to 438 (80%) in Germany (base country). After accounting for purchasing power parities, prices of essential medicines in Lebanon were, on average, 18.1% of those in Germany (Lebanon price index, 18.1 vs Germany price index, 100), while average prices in the US were 3.0 times higher than in Germany (US price index, 298.2). A positive association was observed between countries' gross domestic product per capita (expressed in logarithmic terms) and nominal drug prices (R = 0.30; P = .01), indicating that richer countries generally had higher drug prices. However, when adjusting for the purchasing power of different currencies, an inverse association was observed (R = -0.35; P = .003), suggesting that richer countries had lower real prices. Drug affordability, as measured by the number of days' minimum wage needed to purchase a month's treatment, varied widely, with median affordability highest in Europe and the Western Pacific, and lowest in Africa and Southeast Asia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The results of this cross-sectional analysis showed significant variation in the prices and affordability of 549 essential medicines across 72 markets in 2022. Strategies to promote equitable drug prices and improve drug affordability are urgently needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"volume\":\"6 8\",\"pages\":\"e252043\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12357183/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.2043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.2043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:关于世界卫生组织《基本药物标准清单》所列药物的价格和可负担性在全球范围内的差异,我们知之甚少。目的:比较高、中、低收入市场基本药物的标价和可负担性。设计和环境:本横断面研究检查了2022年72个高、中、低收入市场(覆盖87个国家)549种基本药物的目录价格和数量数据。这些数据来自IQVIA。统计分析时间为2024年8月至2025年3月。主要成果和措施:使用Laspeyres价格指数比较各国的平均药品价格,包括名义价格和经购买力平价调整后的价格。通过计算支付1个月的治疗费所需的最低工资天数,评估了全球用于治疗主要死亡和残疾原因的8种基本药物的可负担性。结果:基本药物可获得性从科威特的225种(41%)到德国(基地国)的438种(80%)不等。在考虑购买力平价后,黎巴嫩的基本药物价格平均为德国的18.1%(黎巴嫩价格指数18.1 vs德国价格指数100),而美国的平均价格是德国的3.0倍(美国价格指数298.2)。观察到各国的人均国内生产总值(以对数形式表示)与名义药品价格之间存在正相关关系(R = 0.30;P = 0.01),这表明富裕国家的药品价格普遍较高。然而,当调整不同货币的购买力时,观察到反向关联(R = -0.35;P = 0.003),表明较富裕国家的实际价格较低。以购买一个月的治疗所需的最低工资天数来衡量,各国的药品负担能力差异很大,欧洲和西太平洋地区的负担能力中位数最高,非洲和东南亚最低。结论和相关性:这一横断面分析的结果显示,2022年72个市场中549种基本药物的价格和可负担性存在显著差异。迫切需要促进公平药品价格和提高药品可负担性的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Prices and Affordability of Essential Medicines in 72 Low-, Middle-, and High-Income Markets.

Prices and Affordability of Essential Medicines in 72 Low-, Middle-, and High-Income Markets.

Prices and Affordability of Essential Medicines in 72 Low-, Middle-, and High-Income Markets.

Prices and Affordability of Essential Medicines in 72 Low-, Middle-, and High-Income Markets.

Importance: Little is known about how the prices and affordability of medicines included on the World Health Organization's Model List of Essential Medicines vary across the globe.

Objective: To compare the list prices and affordability of essential medicines across high-, middle-, and low-income markets.

Design and setting: This cross-sectional study examined data from 2022 on list prices and volumes of 549 essential medicines in 72 high-, middle-, and low-income markets (covering 87 countries). These data were obtained from IQVIA. The statistical analyses were performed between August 2024 and March 2025.

Main outcomes and measures: Laspeyres price indices were used to compare average drug prices across countries, both in nominal and purchasing power parity-adjusted terms. The affordability of 8 essential medicines, used to treat major causes of death and disability globally, was assessed by calculating how many days of minimum wage would be required to pay for 1 month of treatment.

Results: The availability of essential medicines ranged from 225 (41%) in Kuwait to 438 (80%) in Germany (base country). After accounting for purchasing power parities, prices of essential medicines in Lebanon were, on average, 18.1% of those in Germany (Lebanon price index, 18.1 vs Germany price index, 100), while average prices in the US were 3.0 times higher than in Germany (US price index, 298.2). A positive association was observed between countries' gross domestic product per capita (expressed in logarithmic terms) and nominal drug prices (R = 0.30; P = .01), indicating that richer countries generally had higher drug prices. However, when adjusting for the purchasing power of different currencies, an inverse association was observed (R = -0.35; P = .003), suggesting that richer countries had lower real prices. Drug affordability, as measured by the number of days' minimum wage needed to purchase a month's treatment, varied widely, with median affordability highest in Europe and the Western Pacific, and lowest in Africa and Southeast Asia.

Conclusions and relevance: The results of this cross-sectional analysis showed significant variation in the prices and affordability of 549 essential medicines across 72 markets in 2022. Strategies to promote equitable drug prices and improve drug affordability are urgently needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信