评估加拿大分诊和敏锐度量表作为急诊科门诊护理设置的紧急护理工作量的预测因子。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Aaron Penciner, Rachael Iseman, Hassan Sheikh, Kolan Gilmour, Scott Odorizzi
{"title":"评估加拿大分诊和敏锐度量表作为急诊科门诊护理设置的紧急护理工作量的预测因子。","authors":"Aaron Penciner, Rachael Iseman, Hassan Sheikh, Kolan Gilmour, Scott Odorizzi","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2025.07.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Emergency departments face unpredictable workloads owing to diverse patient presentations, often leading to crowding and increased waiting times. Current staffing models in Canadian emergency departments lack evidence-based methods to predict emergency nursing needs, potentially affecting patient safety and outcomes. Other triage systems, such as the Emergency Severity Index and Manchester Triage System, have been shown to have some predictive impact on emergency nursing workload. This study explores the relationship between patient acuity, as determined by the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale, and emergency nursing workload in an ambulatory care area of an emergency department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational time-motion study was conducted in the ambulatory care area of a tertiary care academic emergency department. Research assistants used a custom application to observe emergency nurses and track patient presentations and the time emergency nurses spent on predefined tasks related to patient care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 40 shifts, encompassing 557 patient encounters and 719 patient-care tasks, were analyzed. Emergency nurses spent approximately 80% of their shift on patient-care activities and 20% on breaks. Regression analysis showed no significant correlation between the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale and time spent on \"Orders - Investigations\" tasks. However, there was a mild yet significant correlation between the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale and \"Orders - Treatments\" tasks (r = 0.17; P = .003) and care coordination (r = 0.21; P = .005), indicating that higher-acuity patients required more emergency nursing time for treatments and care coordination.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale triage level is a weak predictor of emergency nursing workload in an emergency department ambulatory care setting. Further research is required to fully understand the relationship between the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale and emergency nursing workload in emergency department ambulatory and nonambulatory settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale as a Predictor of Emergency Nursing Workloads in an Emergency Department Ambulatory Care Setting.\",\"authors\":\"Aaron Penciner, Rachael Iseman, Hassan Sheikh, Kolan Gilmour, Scott Odorizzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jen.2025.07.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Emergency departments face unpredictable workloads owing to diverse patient presentations, often leading to crowding and increased waiting times. Current staffing models in Canadian emergency departments lack evidence-based methods to predict emergency nursing needs, potentially affecting patient safety and outcomes. Other triage systems, such as the Emergency Severity Index and Manchester Triage System, have been shown to have some predictive impact on emergency nursing workload. This study explores the relationship between patient acuity, as determined by the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale, and emergency nursing workload in an ambulatory care area of an emergency department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational time-motion study was conducted in the ambulatory care area of a tertiary care academic emergency department. Research assistants used a custom application to observe emergency nurses and track patient presentations and the time emergency nurses spent on predefined tasks related to patient care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 40 shifts, encompassing 557 patient encounters and 719 patient-care tasks, were analyzed. Emergency nurses spent approximately 80% of their shift on patient-care activities and 20% on breaks. Regression analysis showed no significant correlation between the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale and time spent on \\\"Orders - Investigations\\\" tasks. However, there was a mild yet significant correlation between the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale and \\\"Orders - Treatments\\\" tasks (r = 0.17; P = .003) and care coordination (r = 0.21; P = .005), indicating that higher-acuity patients required more emergency nursing time for treatments and care coordination.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale triage level is a weak predictor of emergency nursing workload in an emergency department ambulatory care setting. Further research is required to fully understand the relationship between the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale and emergency nursing workload in emergency department ambulatory and nonambulatory settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Emergency Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Emergency Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2025.07.007\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2025.07.007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:急诊部门面临着不可预测的工作量,由于不同的病人表现,往往导致拥挤和增加等待时间。加拿大急诊科目前的人员配置模式缺乏基于证据的方法来预测急诊护理需求,这可能会影响患者的安全和结果。其他分诊系统,如紧急严重程度指数和曼彻斯特分诊系统,已被证明对急诊护理工作量有一定的预测影响。本研究探讨了由加拿大急诊科分诊和视力量表确定的患者视力与急诊科门诊护理区急诊护理工作量之间的关系。方法:前瞻性观察时间运动研究进行了门诊护理区三级护理学术急诊科。研究助理使用自定义应用程序来观察急诊护士,并跟踪患者的陈述以及急诊护士在与患者护理相关的预定义任务上花费的时间。结果:分析了40个班次的数据,包括557例患者就诊和719例患者护理任务。急救护士将大约80%的轮班时间用于病人护理活动,20%用于休息时间。回归分析显示,加拿大急诊科分诊和急性程度量表与“命令-调查”任务花费的时间之间没有显著相关性。然而,加拿大急诊科分诊和敏锐度量表与“医嘱-治疗”任务之间存在轻微但显著的相关性(r = 0.17;P = 0.003)和护理协调(r = 0.21;P = 0.005),说明高度度患者需要更多的急诊护理时间进行治疗和护理协调。讨论:加拿大急诊科分诊和急性分级分诊水平是急诊科门诊护理环境中急诊护理工作量的弱预测因子。需要进一步的研究来充分了解加拿大急诊科分诊和急性程度量表与急诊科门诊和非门诊环境中的急诊护理工作量之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale as a Predictor of Emergency Nursing Workloads in an Emergency Department Ambulatory Care Setting.

Introduction: Emergency departments face unpredictable workloads owing to diverse patient presentations, often leading to crowding and increased waiting times. Current staffing models in Canadian emergency departments lack evidence-based methods to predict emergency nursing needs, potentially affecting patient safety and outcomes. Other triage systems, such as the Emergency Severity Index and Manchester Triage System, have been shown to have some predictive impact on emergency nursing workload. This study explores the relationship between patient acuity, as determined by the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale, and emergency nursing workload in an ambulatory care area of an emergency department.

Methods: A prospective observational time-motion study was conducted in the ambulatory care area of a tertiary care academic emergency department. Research assistants used a custom application to observe emergency nurses and track patient presentations and the time emergency nurses spent on predefined tasks related to patient care.

Results: Data from 40 shifts, encompassing 557 patient encounters and 719 patient-care tasks, were analyzed. Emergency nurses spent approximately 80% of their shift on patient-care activities and 20% on breaks. Regression analysis showed no significant correlation between the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale and time spent on "Orders - Investigations" tasks. However, there was a mild yet significant correlation between the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale and "Orders - Treatments" tasks (r = 0.17; P = .003) and care coordination (r = 0.21; P = .005), indicating that higher-acuity patients required more emergency nursing time for treatments and care coordination.

Discussion: The Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale triage level is a weak predictor of emergency nursing workload in an emergency department ambulatory care setting. Further research is required to fully understand the relationship between the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale and emergency nursing workload in emergency department ambulatory and nonambulatory settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
132
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Nursing, the official journal of the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA), is committed to the dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed manuscripts relevant to all areas of emergency nursing practice across the lifespan. Journal content includes clinical topics, integrative or systematic literature reviews, research, and practice improvement initiatives that provide emergency nurses globally with implications for translation of new knowledge into practice. The Journal also includes focused sections such as case studies, pharmacology/toxicology, injury prevention, trauma, triage, quality and safety, pediatrics and geriatrics. The Journal aims to mirror the goal of ENA to promote: community, governance and leadership, knowledge, quality and safety, and advocacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信