Colton Barr, Colin Galvin, Parikshit Juvekar, Erickson Torio, Samantha Horvath, Samantha Sadler, Annie Li, Ryan Bardsley, Tina Kapur, Steve Pieper, Sonia Pujol, Sarah Frisken, Gabor Fichtinger, Alexandra Golby
{"title":"基准测试NousNav:量化空间精度和临床性能的负担得起的,开源的神经导航系统。","authors":"Colton Barr, Colin Galvin, Parikshit Juvekar, Erickson Torio, Samantha Horvath, Samantha Sadler, Annie Li, Ryan Bardsley, Tina Kapur, Steve Pieper, Sonia Pujol, Sarah Frisken, Gabor Fichtinger, Alexandra Golby","doi":"10.1007/s11548-025-03494-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>NousNav is a low-cost, open-source neuronavigation platform built to address the high costs and resource limitations that hinder access to advanced neurosurgical technologies in low-resource settings. The low-cost and accessibility of the system is made possible using consumer-grade optical tracking and open-source software packages. This study aims to assess the performance of these core enabling technologies by quantifying their spatial accuracy and comparing it to a commercial gold standard.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A series of experiments were conducted to evaluate the capabilities of the selected hardware and registration infrastructure utilized in NousNav. Each component was tested both in a simulated bench-top environment and clinically across four brain tumor resection cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Optitrack Duo tracker used by NousNav was found to have a mean localization error of 0.8mm (SD 0.4mm). In bench-top phantom testing, NousNav had an average target registration error of 5.0mm (SD 2.3mm) following patient registration. Clinical evaluations revealed a mean distance of 4.2mm (SD 1.5mm) between points reported by NousNav versus those obtained using a commercial neuronavigation system.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These experiments highlight the role of baseline camera tracking performance, tracked instrument calibration, and patient positioning on the spatial performance of NousNav. They also provide an essential benchmark assessment of the system to help inform future clinical use-cases and direct ongoing system development.</p>","PeriodicalId":51251,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469177/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmarking NousNav: quantifying the spatial accuracy and clinical performance of an affordable, open-source neuronavigation system.\",\"authors\":\"Colton Barr, Colin Galvin, Parikshit Juvekar, Erickson Torio, Samantha Horvath, Samantha Sadler, Annie Li, Ryan Bardsley, Tina Kapur, Steve Pieper, Sonia Pujol, Sarah Frisken, Gabor Fichtinger, Alexandra Golby\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11548-025-03494-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>NousNav is a low-cost, open-source neuronavigation platform built to address the high costs and resource limitations that hinder access to advanced neurosurgical technologies in low-resource settings. The low-cost and accessibility of the system is made possible using consumer-grade optical tracking and open-source software packages. This study aims to assess the performance of these core enabling technologies by quantifying their spatial accuracy and comparing it to a commercial gold standard.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A series of experiments were conducted to evaluate the capabilities of the selected hardware and registration infrastructure utilized in NousNav. Each component was tested both in a simulated bench-top environment and clinically across four brain tumor resection cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Optitrack Duo tracker used by NousNav was found to have a mean localization error of 0.8mm (SD 0.4mm). In bench-top phantom testing, NousNav had an average target registration error of 5.0mm (SD 2.3mm) following patient registration. Clinical evaluations revealed a mean distance of 4.2mm (SD 1.5mm) between points reported by NousNav versus those obtained using a commercial neuronavigation system.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These experiments highlight the role of baseline camera tracking performance, tracked instrument calibration, and patient positioning on the spatial performance of NousNav. They also provide an essential benchmark assessment of the system to help inform future clinical use-cases and direct ongoing system development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469177/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-025-03494-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-025-03494-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Benchmarking NousNav: quantifying the spatial accuracy and clinical performance of an affordable, open-source neuronavigation system.
Purpose: NousNav is a low-cost, open-source neuronavigation platform built to address the high costs and resource limitations that hinder access to advanced neurosurgical technologies in low-resource settings. The low-cost and accessibility of the system is made possible using consumer-grade optical tracking and open-source software packages. This study aims to assess the performance of these core enabling technologies by quantifying their spatial accuracy and comparing it to a commercial gold standard.
Methods: A series of experiments were conducted to evaluate the capabilities of the selected hardware and registration infrastructure utilized in NousNav. Each component was tested both in a simulated bench-top environment and clinically across four brain tumor resection cases.
Results: The Optitrack Duo tracker used by NousNav was found to have a mean localization error of 0.8mm (SD 0.4mm). In bench-top phantom testing, NousNav had an average target registration error of 5.0mm (SD 2.3mm) following patient registration. Clinical evaluations revealed a mean distance of 4.2mm (SD 1.5mm) between points reported by NousNav versus those obtained using a commercial neuronavigation system.
Conclusion: These experiments highlight the role of baseline camera tracking performance, tracked instrument calibration, and patient positioning on the spatial performance of NousNav. They also provide an essential benchmark assessment of the system to help inform future clinical use-cases and direct ongoing system development.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal for Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (IJCARS) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides a platform for closing the gap between medical and technical disciplines, and encourages interdisciplinary research and development activities in an international environment.