应用治疗计划的前列腺癌CT图像自动分割锥束CT图像。

IF 1.5 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yoshiki Takayama, Noriyuki Kadoya, Takaya Yamamoto, Yuya Miyasaka, Yosuke Kusano, Tomohiro Kajikawa, Seiji Tomori, Yoshiyuki Katsuta, Shohei Tanaka, Kazuhiro Arai, Ken Takeda, Keiichi Jingu
{"title":"应用治疗计划的前列腺癌CT图像自动分割锥束CT图像。","authors":"Yoshiki Takayama, Noriyuki Kadoya, Takaya Yamamoto, Yuya Miyasaka, Yosuke Kusano, Tomohiro Kajikawa, Seiji Tomori, Yoshiyuki Katsuta, Shohei Tanaka, Kazuhiro Arai, Ken Takeda, Keiichi Jingu","doi":"10.1007/s12194-025-00946-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cone-beam computed tomography-based online adaptive radiotherapy (CBCT-based online ART) is currently used in clinical practice; however, deep learning-based segmentation of CBCT images remains challenging. Previous studies generated CBCT datasets for segmentation by adding contours outside clinical practice or synthesizing tissue contrast-enhanced diagnostic images paired with CBCT images. This study aimed to improve CBCT segmentation by matching the treatment planning CT (tpCT) image quality to CBCT images without altering the tpCT image or its contours. A deep-learning-based CBCT segmentation model was trained for the male pelvis using only the tpCT dataset. To bridge the quality gap between tpCT and routine CBCT images, an artificial pseudo-CBCT dataset was generated using Gaussian noise and Fourier domain adaptation (FDA) for 80 tpCT datasets (the hybrid FDA method). A five-fold cross-validation approach was used for model training. For comparison, atlas-based segmentation was performed with a registered tpCT dataset. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) assessed contour quality between the model-predicted and reference manual contours. The average DSC values for the clinical target volume, bladder, and rectum using the hybrid FDA method were 0.71 ± 0.08, 0.84 ± 0.08, and 0.78 ± 0.06, respectively. Conversely, the values for the model using plain tpCT were 0.40 ± 0.12, 0.17 ± 0.21, and 0.18 ± 0.14, and for the atlas-based model were 0.66 ± 0.13, 0.59 ± 0.16, and 0.66 ± 0.11, respectively. The segmentation model using the hybrid FDA method demonstrated significantly higher accuracy than models trained on plain tpCT datasets and those using atlas-based segmentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":46252,"journal":{"name":"Radiological Physics and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automatic segmentation of cone beam CT images using treatment planning CT images in patients with prostate cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Yoshiki Takayama, Noriyuki Kadoya, Takaya Yamamoto, Yuya Miyasaka, Yosuke Kusano, Tomohiro Kajikawa, Seiji Tomori, Yoshiyuki Katsuta, Shohei Tanaka, Kazuhiro Arai, Ken Takeda, Keiichi Jingu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12194-025-00946-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cone-beam computed tomography-based online adaptive radiotherapy (CBCT-based online ART) is currently used in clinical practice; however, deep learning-based segmentation of CBCT images remains challenging. Previous studies generated CBCT datasets for segmentation by adding contours outside clinical practice or synthesizing tissue contrast-enhanced diagnostic images paired with CBCT images. This study aimed to improve CBCT segmentation by matching the treatment planning CT (tpCT) image quality to CBCT images without altering the tpCT image or its contours. A deep-learning-based CBCT segmentation model was trained for the male pelvis using only the tpCT dataset. To bridge the quality gap between tpCT and routine CBCT images, an artificial pseudo-CBCT dataset was generated using Gaussian noise and Fourier domain adaptation (FDA) for 80 tpCT datasets (the hybrid FDA method). A five-fold cross-validation approach was used for model training. For comparison, atlas-based segmentation was performed with a registered tpCT dataset. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) assessed contour quality between the model-predicted and reference manual contours. The average DSC values for the clinical target volume, bladder, and rectum using the hybrid FDA method were 0.71 ± 0.08, 0.84 ± 0.08, and 0.78 ± 0.06, respectively. Conversely, the values for the model using plain tpCT were 0.40 ± 0.12, 0.17 ± 0.21, and 0.18 ± 0.14, and for the atlas-based model were 0.66 ± 0.13, 0.59 ± 0.16, and 0.66 ± 0.11, respectively. The segmentation model using the hybrid FDA method demonstrated significantly higher accuracy than models trained on plain tpCT datasets and those using atlas-based segmentation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiological Physics and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiological Physics and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-025-00946-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiological Physics and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-025-00946-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于锥形束计算机断层成像的在线自适应放疗(基于cbct的在线ART)目前在临床应用;然而,基于深度学习的CBCT图像分割仍然具有挑战性。以前的研究通过在临床实践之外添加轮廓或合成与CBCT图像配对的组织对比度增强诊断图像来生成CBCT数据集进行分割。本研究的目的是在不改变治疗计划CT (tpCT)图像及其轮廓的情况下,通过将治疗计划CT (tpCT)图像质量与CBCT图像进行匹配,从而改善CBCT分割。仅使用tpCT数据集训练基于深度学习的男性骨盆CBCT分割模型。为了弥合tpCT和常规CBCT图像之间的质量差距,对80个tpCT数据集(混合FDA方法)使用高斯噪声和傅里叶域自适应(FDA)生成人工伪CBCT数据集。采用五重交叉验证方法进行模型训练。为了进行比较,使用注册的tpCT数据集进行基于地图集的分割。Dice相似系数(DSC)评估模型预测和参考手工轮廓之间的轮廓质量。混合FDA法对临床靶体积、膀胱和直肠的平均DSC值分别为0.71±0.08、0.84±0.08和0.78±0.06。相反,使用平原tpCT的模型的值分别为0.40±0.12、0.17±0.21和0.18±0.14,而基于atlas的模型的值分别为0.66±0.13、0.59±0.16和0.66±0.11。使用混合FDA方法的分割模型比使用普通tpCT数据集训练的模型和使用基于atlas的分割模型显示出更高的准确率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Automatic segmentation of cone beam CT images using treatment planning CT images in patients with prostate cancer.

Cone-beam computed tomography-based online adaptive radiotherapy (CBCT-based online ART) is currently used in clinical practice; however, deep learning-based segmentation of CBCT images remains challenging. Previous studies generated CBCT datasets for segmentation by adding contours outside clinical practice or synthesizing tissue contrast-enhanced diagnostic images paired with CBCT images. This study aimed to improve CBCT segmentation by matching the treatment planning CT (tpCT) image quality to CBCT images without altering the tpCT image or its contours. A deep-learning-based CBCT segmentation model was trained for the male pelvis using only the tpCT dataset. To bridge the quality gap between tpCT and routine CBCT images, an artificial pseudo-CBCT dataset was generated using Gaussian noise and Fourier domain adaptation (FDA) for 80 tpCT datasets (the hybrid FDA method). A five-fold cross-validation approach was used for model training. For comparison, atlas-based segmentation was performed with a registered tpCT dataset. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) assessed contour quality between the model-predicted and reference manual contours. The average DSC values for the clinical target volume, bladder, and rectum using the hybrid FDA method were 0.71 ± 0.08, 0.84 ± 0.08, and 0.78 ± 0.06, respectively. Conversely, the values for the model using plain tpCT were 0.40 ± 0.12, 0.17 ± 0.21, and 0.18 ± 0.14, and for the atlas-based model were 0.66 ± 0.13, 0.59 ± 0.16, and 0.66 ± 0.11, respectively. The segmentation model using the hybrid FDA method demonstrated significantly higher accuracy than models trained on plain tpCT datasets and those using atlas-based segmentation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiological Physics and Technology
Radiological Physics and Technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal Radiological Physics and Technology is to provide a forum for sharing new knowledge related to research and development in radiological science and technology, including medical physics and radiological technology in diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy among many other radiological disciplines, as well as to contribute to progress and improvement in medical practice and patient health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信