安全选择:儿科门诊手术中心排除标准的多中心分析。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pediatric Anesthesia Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-14 DOI:10.1111/pan.70037
Vasili Chernishof, Sameh Nour, Shiu-Yi Emily Chen, Yu Bin Na, Laura Prichett, Samuel M Vanderhoek
{"title":"安全选择:儿科门诊手术中心排除标准的多中心分析。","authors":"Vasili Chernishof, Sameh Nour, Shiu-Yi Emily Chen, Yu Bin Na, Laura Prichett, Samuel M Vanderhoek","doi":"10.1111/pan.70037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the United States, over a quarter of outpatient pediatric procedures take place in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). Previous studies have identified substantial variability in clinical staffing, pediatric-specific training, and policy development among ASCs that provide pediatric care.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To characterize and compare the exclusion criteria currently used in ASCs affiliated with pediatric hospital systems across the continental United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this descriptive study, we solicited exclusion guidelines from the 30 largest pediatric hospitals representing each geographic region in the continental United States. Additionally, we surveyed each institution regarding the physical configuration of its ambulatory surgery center, as well as the availability of ancillary site support and the center's proximity to the parent institution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While there was general consistency in excluding children with a history of congenital heart disease, pulmonary conditions, and difficult airway, we found considerable heterogeneity in minimum age thresholds, obesity criteria, and recent respiratory infection. Additionally, there was variation in ambulatory surgery center proximity to its parent institution, resources available at the facility, and capacity for extended observation beyond same-day discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight the need for standardized, evidence-based guidelines that balance consistency with site-specific flexibility to ensure safe and efficient care for pediatric patients in ambulatory surgery settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19745,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":"962-968"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safe Selection: A Multi-Center Analysis of Exclusion Criteria in Pediatric Ambulatory Surgery Centers.\",\"authors\":\"Vasili Chernishof, Sameh Nour, Shiu-Yi Emily Chen, Yu Bin Na, Laura Prichett, Samuel M Vanderhoek\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pan.70037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the United States, over a quarter of outpatient pediatric procedures take place in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). Previous studies have identified substantial variability in clinical staffing, pediatric-specific training, and policy development among ASCs that provide pediatric care.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To characterize and compare the exclusion criteria currently used in ASCs affiliated with pediatric hospital systems across the continental United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this descriptive study, we solicited exclusion guidelines from the 30 largest pediatric hospitals representing each geographic region in the continental United States. Additionally, we surveyed each institution regarding the physical configuration of its ambulatory surgery center, as well as the availability of ancillary site support and the center's proximity to the parent institution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While there was general consistency in excluding children with a history of congenital heart disease, pulmonary conditions, and difficult airway, we found considerable heterogeneity in minimum age thresholds, obesity criteria, and recent respiratory infection. Additionally, there was variation in ambulatory surgery center proximity to its parent institution, resources available at the facility, and capacity for extended observation beyond same-day discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight the need for standardized, evidence-based guidelines that balance consistency with site-specific flexibility to ensure safe and efficient care for pediatric patients in ambulatory surgery settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"962-968\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.70037\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.70037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在美国,超过四分之一的儿科门诊手术在门诊手术中心(ASCs)进行。以前的研究已经确定了在提供儿科护理的ASCs中临床人员配置、儿科专门培训和政策制定方面的实质性差异。目的:描述和比较目前在美国大陆儿科医院系统附属ASCs中使用的排除标准。方法:在这项描述性研究中,我们从代表美国大陆每个地理区域的30家最大的儿科医院征求排除指南。此外,我们调查了每家机构关于其门诊手术中心的物理配置,以及辅助场地支持的可用性和中心与母机构的距离。结果:虽然在排除有先天性心脏病、肺部疾病和气道困难病史的儿童方面基本一致,但我们发现在最低年龄阈值、肥胖标准和近期呼吸道感染方面存在相当大的异质性。此外,门诊手术中心与其母机构的距离、设施的可用资源以及当日出院后延长观察的能力也存在差异。结论:这些发现强调需要标准化的、基于证据的指南,以平衡一致性和特定地点的灵活性,以确保门诊手术环境中儿科患者的安全和有效护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safe Selection: A Multi-Center Analysis of Exclusion Criteria in Pediatric Ambulatory Surgery Centers.

Background: In the United States, over a quarter of outpatient pediatric procedures take place in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). Previous studies have identified substantial variability in clinical staffing, pediatric-specific training, and policy development among ASCs that provide pediatric care.

Aims: To characterize and compare the exclusion criteria currently used in ASCs affiliated with pediatric hospital systems across the continental United States.

Methods: In this descriptive study, we solicited exclusion guidelines from the 30 largest pediatric hospitals representing each geographic region in the continental United States. Additionally, we surveyed each institution regarding the physical configuration of its ambulatory surgery center, as well as the availability of ancillary site support and the center's proximity to the parent institution.

Results: While there was general consistency in excluding children with a history of congenital heart disease, pulmonary conditions, and difficult airway, we found considerable heterogeneity in minimum age thresholds, obesity criteria, and recent respiratory infection. Additionally, there was variation in ambulatory surgery center proximity to its parent institution, resources available at the facility, and capacity for extended observation beyond same-day discharge.

Conclusions: These findings highlight the need for standardized, evidence-based guidelines that balance consistency with site-specific flexibility to ensure safe and efficient care for pediatric patients in ambulatory surgery settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Anesthesia
Pediatric Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Devoted to the dissemination of research of interest and importance to practising anesthetists everywhere, the scientific and clinical content of Pediatric Anesthesia covers a wide selection of medical disciplines in all areas relevant to paediatric anaesthesia, pain management and peri-operative medicine. The International Editorial Board is supported by the Editorial Advisory Board and a team of Senior Advisors, to ensure that the journal is publishing the best work from the front line of research in the field. The journal publishes high-quality, relevant scientific and clinical research papers, reviews, commentaries, pro-con debates, historical vignettes, correspondence, case presentations and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信