使用基于hfa - peff的临床决策支持系统的促进因素、障碍和见解:一项概念验证研究。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Isidora Milosavljević, Ivan Petrović, Aleksandra Ilić, Dragana Dabović, Aleksandra Milovančev, Goran Remer, Vladimir Vuković, Dimitrije Zdravković, Maja Stefanović, Snežana Stojšić, Ana Balenović, Goran Lončar, Snežana Tadić, Milana Jaraković, Snežana Bjelić, Snežana Čemerlić, Marija Bjelobrk, Tatjana Miljković, Andrej Preveden, Milovan Petrović, Srdjan Maletin, Tanja Popov, Vanja Drljević Todić, Mirko Todić, Aleksandra Vulin, Milenko Čanković, Dragica Andrić, Dragoslava Živkov Šaponja, Aleksandar Redžek, Anastazija Stojšić Milosavljević
{"title":"使用基于hfa - peff的临床决策支持系统的促进因素、障碍和见解:一项概念验证研究。","authors":"Isidora Milosavljević,&nbsp;Ivan Petrović,&nbsp;Aleksandra Ilić,&nbsp;Dragana Dabović,&nbsp;Aleksandra Milovančev,&nbsp;Goran Remer,&nbsp;Vladimir Vuković,&nbsp;Dimitrije Zdravković,&nbsp;Maja Stefanović,&nbsp;Snežana Stojšić,&nbsp;Ana Balenović,&nbsp;Goran Lončar,&nbsp;Snežana Tadić,&nbsp;Milana Jaraković,&nbsp;Snežana Bjelić,&nbsp;Snežana Čemerlić,&nbsp;Marija Bjelobrk,&nbsp;Tatjana Miljković,&nbsp;Andrej Preveden,&nbsp;Milovan Petrović,&nbsp;Srdjan Maletin,&nbsp;Tanja Popov,&nbsp;Vanja Drljević Todić,&nbsp;Mirko Todić,&nbsp;Aleksandra Vulin,&nbsp;Milenko Čanković,&nbsp;Dragica Andrić,&nbsp;Dragoslava Živkov Šaponja,&nbsp;Aleksandar Redžek,&nbsp;Anastazija Stojšić Milosavljević","doi":"10.1002/ehf2.15397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and aims</h3>\n \n <p>Knowing that heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) can be difficult to diagnose, a clinical decision support system (CDSS), with functional, morphological and biomarker domains, was built. Therefore, this research aimed to analyse the possibility of implementing CDSS, compliance of the physicians with the CDSS recommendations, as well as identify obstacles and facilitators to its usage.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This mixed-methods study was conducted over a 1 year period at the Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases of Vojvodina (Sremska Kamenica, Serbia). The retrospective component included an analysis of patients who had symptoms and/or signs of HF, with an ejection fraction (EF) of ≥50%. The Heart Failure Association pre-test assessment, echocardiography and natriuretic peptide, functional testing, final aetiology (HFA-PEFF) score was used to build a CDSS and to calculate the probability scores for these patients. The prospective component involved an electronic survey that was used to gain feedback from physicians about the CDSS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The sample included 225 patients, out of which 194 (86.2%) had the HFA-PEFF score of 5–6, suggesting probable HFpEF. This syndrome was clinically documented in the discharge report in only 32 (16.5%) of these patients. The response rate of the survey was 83.3%, including physicians at different levels of education. Barriers to CDSS usage included a lack of echocardiographic skills and knowledge about phenotype profiling in HFpEF patients. An increase in explainability and transparency, as well as staff education, were mentioned as the main facilitators.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The CDSS demonstrated reasonable effectiveness in diagnosing and classifying patients with symptoms of HF if the measured EF was ≥50%. The conducted survey highlighted that physician education, in both CDSS- and HFpEF-related domains, is a key factor in the battle against HFpEF.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11864,"journal":{"name":"ESC Heart Failure","volume":"12 5","pages":"3655-3666"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ehf2.15397","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Facilitators, barriers, and insights using an HFA-PEFF-based clinical decision support system: A proof-of-concept study\",\"authors\":\"Isidora Milosavljević,&nbsp;Ivan Petrović,&nbsp;Aleksandra Ilić,&nbsp;Dragana Dabović,&nbsp;Aleksandra Milovančev,&nbsp;Goran Remer,&nbsp;Vladimir Vuković,&nbsp;Dimitrije Zdravković,&nbsp;Maja Stefanović,&nbsp;Snežana Stojšić,&nbsp;Ana Balenović,&nbsp;Goran Lončar,&nbsp;Snežana Tadić,&nbsp;Milana Jaraković,&nbsp;Snežana Bjelić,&nbsp;Snežana Čemerlić,&nbsp;Marija Bjelobrk,&nbsp;Tatjana Miljković,&nbsp;Andrej Preveden,&nbsp;Milovan Petrović,&nbsp;Srdjan Maletin,&nbsp;Tanja Popov,&nbsp;Vanja Drljević Todić,&nbsp;Mirko Todić,&nbsp;Aleksandra Vulin,&nbsp;Milenko Čanković,&nbsp;Dragica Andrić,&nbsp;Dragoslava Živkov Šaponja,&nbsp;Aleksandar Redžek,&nbsp;Anastazija Stojšić Milosavljević\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ehf2.15397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background and aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>Knowing that heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) can be difficult to diagnose, a clinical decision support system (CDSS), with functional, morphological and biomarker domains, was built. Therefore, this research aimed to analyse the possibility of implementing CDSS, compliance of the physicians with the CDSS recommendations, as well as identify obstacles and facilitators to its usage.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This mixed-methods study was conducted over a 1 year period at the Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases of Vojvodina (Sremska Kamenica, Serbia). The retrospective component included an analysis of patients who had symptoms and/or signs of HF, with an ejection fraction (EF) of ≥50%. The Heart Failure Association pre-test assessment, echocardiography and natriuretic peptide, functional testing, final aetiology (HFA-PEFF) score was used to build a CDSS and to calculate the probability scores for these patients. The prospective component involved an electronic survey that was used to gain feedback from physicians about the CDSS.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The sample included 225 patients, out of which 194 (86.2%) had the HFA-PEFF score of 5–6, suggesting probable HFpEF. This syndrome was clinically documented in the discharge report in only 32 (16.5%) of these patients. The response rate of the survey was 83.3%, including physicians at different levels of education. Barriers to CDSS usage included a lack of echocardiographic skills and knowledge about phenotype profiling in HFpEF patients. An increase in explainability and transparency, as well as staff education, were mentioned as the main facilitators.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The CDSS demonstrated reasonable effectiveness in diagnosing and classifying patients with symptoms of HF if the measured EF was ≥50%. The conducted survey highlighted that physician education, in both CDSS- and HFpEF-related domains, is a key factor in the battle against HFpEF.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ESC Heart Failure\",\"volume\":\"12 5\",\"pages\":\"3655-3666\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ehf2.15397\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ESC Heart Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ehf2.15397\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESC Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ehf2.15397","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:了解到保留射血分数(HFpEF)的心力衰竭(HF)难以诊断,我们建立了一个包含功能、形态和生物标记域的临床决策支持系统(CDSS)。因此,本研究旨在分析实施CDSS的可能性,医生对CDSS建议的依从性,以及确定其使用的障碍和促进因素。方法:这项混合方法研究在伏伊伏丁那心血管疾病研究所(塞尔维亚Sremska Kamenica)进行了为期1年的研究。回顾性分析包括对有HF症状和/或体征且射血分数(EF)≥50%的患者进行分析。采用心力衰竭协会试验前评估、超声心动图和利钠肽、功能检查、最终病因(HFA-PEFF)评分建立CDSS并计算这些患者的概率评分。前瞻性部分包括一项电子调查,用于从医生那里获得关于CDSS的反馈。结果:纳入225例患者,其中194例(86.2%)HFA-PEFF评分为5-6,提示可能为HFpEF。这些患者中只有32例(16.5%)在出院报告中有临床记录。调查的回复率为83.3%,包括不同学历的医师。CDSS使用的障碍包括缺乏超声心动图技能和HFpEF患者表型谱的知识。与会者提到,增加可解释性和透明度以及工作人员教育是主要的促进因素。结论:当测量的EF≥50%时,CDSS对HF症状的诊断和分类具有合理的有效性。进行的调查强调,在CDSS和HFpEF相关领域的医生教育是对抗HFpEF的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Facilitators, barriers, and insights using an HFA-PEFF-based clinical decision support system: A proof-of-concept study

Facilitators, barriers, and insights using an HFA-PEFF-based clinical decision support system: A proof-of-concept study

Background and aims

Knowing that heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) can be difficult to diagnose, a clinical decision support system (CDSS), with functional, morphological and biomarker domains, was built. Therefore, this research aimed to analyse the possibility of implementing CDSS, compliance of the physicians with the CDSS recommendations, as well as identify obstacles and facilitators to its usage.

Methods

This mixed-methods study was conducted over a 1 year period at the Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases of Vojvodina (Sremska Kamenica, Serbia). The retrospective component included an analysis of patients who had symptoms and/or signs of HF, with an ejection fraction (EF) of ≥50%. The Heart Failure Association pre-test assessment, echocardiography and natriuretic peptide, functional testing, final aetiology (HFA-PEFF) score was used to build a CDSS and to calculate the probability scores for these patients. The prospective component involved an electronic survey that was used to gain feedback from physicians about the CDSS.

Results

The sample included 225 patients, out of which 194 (86.2%) had the HFA-PEFF score of 5–6, suggesting probable HFpEF. This syndrome was clinically documented in the discharge report in only 32 (16.5%) of these patients. The response rate of the survey was 83.3%, including physicians at different levels of education. Barriers to CDSS usage included a lack of echocardiographic skills and knowledge about phenotype profiling in HFpEF patients. An increase in explainability and transparency, as well as staff education, were mentioned as the main facilitators.

Conclusions

The CDSS demonstrated reasonable effectiveness in diagnosing and classifying patients with symptoms of HF if the measured EF was ≥50%. The conducted survey highlighted that physician education, in both CDSS- and HFpEF-related domains, is a key factor in the battle against HFpEF.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ESC Heart Failure
ESC Heart Failure Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
7.90%
发文量
461
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: ESC Heart Failure is the open access journal of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology dedicated to the advancement of knowledge in the field of heart failure. The journal aims to improve the understanding, prevention, investigation and treatment of heart failure. Molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, as well as the clinical, social and population sciences all form part of the discipline that is heart failure. Accordingly, submission of manuscripts on basic, translational, clinical and population sciences is invited. Original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics and other specialist fields related to heart failure are also welcome, as are case reports that highlight interesting aspects of heart failure care and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信