{"title":"房间隔缺损装置关闭后6个月出血性心包积液:是否有侵蚀?","authors":"Alaina Zameer, Chetan Patel, Lamk Kadiyani, Damandeep Singh, Shivam Goel, Sivasubramanian Ramakrishnan","doi":"10.4103/apc.apc_216_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect (ASD) is the preferred modality of treatment. Pericardial effusion occurring late after ASD device closure is extremely rare, and device-related erosion is the most likely possibility. We describe a 41-year-old male who underwent ASD device closure with a 32-mm Amplatzer Septal Occluder device and who developed cardiac tamponade 6 months after the procedure. Extensive investigations did not reveal any evidence of erosion. Given the endemicity of tuberculosis in India, exudative pericardial effusion, a positive tuberculin skin test, and the presence of a few matted mediastinal lymph nodes, the patient was started on antitubercular therapy. There was no reaccumulation of pericardial fluid at subsequent follow-ups. To conclude, not all hemorrhagic pericardial effusions following device closure of ASD are secondary to erosions. After ruling out device erosion, other etiologies for pericardial effusion should be carefully searched for.</p>","PeriodicalId":8026,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pediatric Cardiology","volume":"18 1","pages":"53-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12348705/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hemorrhagic pericardial effusion 6 months following atrial septal defect device closure: Has it eroded?\",\"authors\":\"Alaina Zameer, Chetan Patel, Lamk Kadiyani, Damandeep Singh, Shivam Goel, Sivasubramanian Ramakrishnan\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/apc.apc_216_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect (ASD) is the preferred modality of treatment. Pericardial effusion occurring late after ASD device closure is extremely rare, and device-related erosion is the most likely possibility. We describe a 41-year-old male who underwent ASD device closure with a 32-mm Amplatzer Septal Occluder device and who developed cardiac tamponade 6 months after the procedure. Extensive investigations did not reveal any evidence of erosion. Given the endemicity of tuberculosis in India, exudative pericardial effusion, a positive tuberculin skin test, and the presence of a few matted mediastinal lymph nodes, the patient was started on antitubercular therapy. There was no reaccumulation of pericardial fluid at subsequent follow-ups. To conclude, not all hemorrhagic pericardial effusions following device closure of ASD are secondary to erosions. After ruling out device erosion, other etiologies for pericardial effusion should be carefully searched for.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Pediatric Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"53-56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12348705/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Pediatric Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/apc.apc_216_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Pediatric Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/apc.apc_216_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hemorrhagic pericardial effusion 6 months following atrial septal defect device closure: Has it eroded?
Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect (ASD) is the preferred modality of treatment. Pericardial effusion occurring late after ASD device closure is extremely rare, and device-related erosion is the most likely possibility. We describe a 41-year-old male who underwent ASD device closure with a 32-mm Amplatzer Septal Occluder device and who developed cardiac tamponade 6 months after the procedure. Extensive investigations did not reveal any evidence of erosion. Given the endemicity of tuberculosis in India, exudative pericardial effusion, a positive tuberculin skin test, and the presence of a few matted mediastinal lymph nodes, the patient was started on antitubercular therapy. There was no reaccumulation of pericardial fluid at subsequent follow-ups. To conclude, not all hemorrhagic pericardial effusions following device closure of ASD are secondary to erosions. After ruling out device erosion, other etiologies for pericardial effusion should be carefully searched for.