缓解植被覆盖度验证空间尺度效应的多层代表性框架——基于无人机的青藏高原高寒草原全球产品评估

IF 8.6 Q1 REMOTE SENSING
Jianjun Chen , Renjie Huang , Lihui Luo , Shuhua Yi , Yu Qin , Wenbo Qi , Haotian You , Xiaowen Han , Guoqing Zhou
{"title":"缓解植被覆盖度验证空间尺度效应的多层代表性框架——基于无人机的青藏高原高寒草原全球产品评估","authors":"Jianjun Chen ,&nbsp;Renjie Huang ,&nbsp;Lihui Luo ,&nbsp;Shuhua Yi ,&nbsp;Yu Qin ,&nbsp;Wenbo Qi ,&nbsp;Haotian You ,&nbsp;Xiaowen Han ,&nbsp;Guoqing Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.jag.2025.104794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ground-measured fractional vegetation cover (FVC) data are critical for validating satellite-derived FVC products. However, spatial scale mismatches between ground plots and satellite pixels, compounded by the scarcity of field data in remote regions, introduce significant uncertainties in product validation. This study proposes a novel multi-tiered representativeness framework integrating three key indices: the absolute difference of spatial upscaling transformations, the heterogeneity of the surrounding environment, and FVC temporal stability. The framework’s implementation leveraged an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) observation network (870 monitoring plots, 2015–2024) within the alpine grassland ecosystem of the Three-River Source Region on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, classified into four levels, with levels 1–2 indicating high level and 3–4 lower. Our results reveal that both the environmental heterogeneity of monitoring plots and scale mismatches substantially impact the validation accuracy of FVC products. By applying the proposed framework, validation using high-level monitoring plots reduced uncertainty by approximately 40 % compared to using all monitoring plots (GEOV3: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.964, RMSE = 0.075 vs. R<sup>2</sup> = 0.830, RMSE = 0.138; GLASS: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.957, RMSE = 0.068 vs. R<sup>2</sup> = 0.812, RMSE = 0.121), highlighting its effectiveness in mitigating spatial representativeness errors. Furthermore, the validation results for two global FVC products (GEOV3 and GLASS) highlight systematic biases in their performance within alpine ecosystems. These findings advance validation methodologies for remote sensing products in heterogeneous landscapes and provide actionable insights for improving algorithm parameterization. The framework’s modular design enables adaptation to other critical validation scenarios requiring spatial representativeness quantification.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73423,"journal":{"name":"International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 104794"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multi-tiered representativeness framework mitigating spatial scale effects in FVC validation: UAV-based assessment of global products in Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau alpine grasslands\",\"authors\":\"Jianjun Chen ,&nbsp;Renjie Huang ,&nbsp;Lihui Luo ,&nbsp;Shuhua Yi ,&nbsp;Yu Qin ,&nbsp;Wenbo Qi ,&nbsp;Haotian You ,&nbsp;Xiaowen Han ,&nbsp;Guoqing Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jag.2025.104794\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Ground-measured fractional vegetation cover (FVC) data are critical for validating satellite-derived FVC products. However, spatial scale mismatches between ground plots and satellite pixels, compounded by the scarcity of field data in remote regions, introduce significant uncertainties in product validation. This study proposes a novel multi-tiered representativeness framework integrating three key indices: the absolute difference of spatial upscaling transformations, the heterogeneity of the surrounding environment, and FVC temporal stability. The framework’s implementation leveraged an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) observation network (870 monitoring plots, 2015–2024) within the alpine grassland ecosystem of the Three-River Source Region on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, classified into four levels, with levels 1–2 indicating high level and 3–4 lower. Our results reveal that both the environmental heterogeneity of monitoring plots and scale mismatches substantially impact the validation accuracy of FVC products. By applying the proposed framework, validation using high-level monitoring plots reduced uncertainty by approximately 40 % compared to using all monitoring plots (GEOV3: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.964, RMSE = 0.075 vs. R<sup>2</sup> = 0.830, RMSE = 0.138; GLASS: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.957, RMSE = 0.068 vs. R<sup>2</sup> = 0.812, RMSE = 0.121), highlighting its effectiveness in mitigating spatial representativeness errors. Furthermore, the validation results for two global FVC products (GEOV3 and GLASS) highlight systematic biases in their performance within alpine ecosystems. These findings advance validation methodologies for remote sensing products in heterogeneous landscapes and provide actionable insights for improving algorithm parameterization. The framework’s modular design enables adaptation to other critical validation scenarios requiring spatial representativeness quantification.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal\",\"volume\":\"143 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104794\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569843225004418\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REMOTE SENSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569843225004418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地面测量植被覆盖度(FVC)数据对于验证卫星衍生的植被覆盖度产品至关重要。然而,地面地块和卫星像素之间的空间尺度不匹配,加上偏远地区实地数据的稀缺,给产品验证带来了重大的不确定性。本文提出了一种新的多层代表性框架,该框架综合了空间上尺度转换的绝对差异、周围环境的异质性和植被覆盖度的时间稳定性三个关键指标。该框架的实施利用了青藏高原三江源区高寒草地生态系统内的无人机(UAV)观测网络(2015-2024年,870个监测地块),分为四个级别,1-2级表示高水平,3-4级表示低水平。研究结果表明,监测地块的环境异质性和尺度失配对植被覆盖度产品的验证精度有很大影响。通过应用所提出的框架,与使用所有监测地块相比,使用高水平监测地块进行验证可减少约40%的不确定性(GEOV3: R2 = 0.964, RMSE = 0.075 vs. R2 = 0.830, RMSE = 0.138;GLASS: R2 = 0.957, RMSE = 0.068 vs. R2 = 0.812, RMSE = 0.121),突出了其在缓解空间代表性误差方面的有效性。此外,两种全球植被覆盖度产品(GEOV3和GLASS)的验证结果表明,它们在高山生态系统中的表现存在系统性偏差。这些发现促进了异质景观遥感产品的验证方法,并为改进算法参数化提供了可行的见解。该框架的模块化设计能够适应其他需要空间代表性量化的关键验证场景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A multi-tiered representativeness framework mitigating spatial scale effects in FVC validation: UAV-based assessment of global products in Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau alpine grasslands
Ground-measured fractional vegetation cover (FVC) data are critical for validating satellite-derived FVC products. However, spatial scale mismatches between ground plots and satellite pixels, compounded by the scarcity of field data in remote regions, introduce significant uncertainties in product validation. This study proposes a novel multi-tiered representativeness framework integrating three key indices: the absolute difference of spatial upscaling transformations, the heterogeneity of the surrounding environment, and FVC temporal stability. The framework’s implementation leveraged an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) observation network (870 monitoring plots, 2015–2024) within the alpine grassland ecosystem of the Three-River Source Region on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, classified into four levels, with levels 1–2 indicating high level and 3–4 lower. Our results reveal that both the environmental heterogeneity of monitoring plots and scale mismatches substantially impact the validation accuracy of FVC products. By applying the proposed framework, validation using high-level monitoring plots reduced uncertainty by approximately 40 % compared to using all monitoring plots (GEOV3: R2 = 0.964, RMSE = 0.075 vs. R2 = 0.830, RMSE = 0.138; GLASS: R2 = 0.957, RMSE = 0.068 vs. R2 = 0.812, RMSE = 0.121), highlighting its effectiveness in mitigating spatial representativeness errors. Furthermore, the validation results for two global FVC products (GEOV3 and GLASS) highlight systematic biases in their performance within alpine ecosystems. These findings advance validation methodologies for remote sensing products in heterogeneous landscapes and provide actionable insights for improving algorithm parameterization. The framework’s modular design enables adaptation to other critical validation scenarios requiring spatial representativeness quantification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal
International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Earth-Surface Processes, Computers in Earth Sciences
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
77 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation publishes original papers that utilize earth observation data for natural resource and environmental inventory and management. These data primarily originate from remote sensing platforms, including satellites and aircraft, supplemented by surface and subsurface measurements. Addressing natural resources such as forests, agricultural land, soils, and water, as well as environmental concerns like biodiversity, land degradation, and hazards, the journal explores conceptual and data-driven approaches. It covers geoinformation themes like capturing, databasing, visualization, interpretation, data quality, and spatial uncertainty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信