高精度机载激光雷达对城市林业仍然至关重要:揭示了最近在城市环境中大规模冠层高度产品的局限性

IF 8.6 Q1 REMOTE SENSING
Hesong Dong , Zhibang Xu , Jinzhou Wu , Ting Lan , Lin Wang , Guofan Shao , Lina Tang
{"title":"高精度机载激光雷达对城市林业仍然至关重要:揭示了最近在城市环境中大规模冠层高度产品的局限性","authors":"Hesong Dong ,&nbsp;Zhibang Xu ,&nbsp;Jinzhou Wu ,&nbsp;Ting Lan ,&nbsp;Lin Wang ,&nbsp;Guofan Shao ,&nbsp;Lina Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.jag.2025.104791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban trees play a crucial role in delivering ecosystem services, yet their structural complexity poses significant challenges for remote sensing. Although recent large-scale, open-access canopy height models (CHMs) offer potential alternatives to airborne LiDAR, their suitability for urban environments remains uncertain. This study systematically evaluated four prominent CHMs (Potapov, Lang, Tolan, and Malambo) using high-resolution airborne LiDAR data from Washington, D.C., with complementary analyses from four additional cities. We assessed their performance in both canopy classification and height prediction using classification and regression metrics, spatial autocorrelation, consistency tests, and explainable machine learning. Results revealed consistent limitations across products, including widespread misclassification of canopy, systematic tree height prediction biases — characterized by overestimation of low and underestimation of high canopies (the OLUH effect) — and pronounced spatial clustering of errors along urban–forest edges. Among the models, only the Lang CHM passed the Bland–Altman consistency test, showing marginal statistical agreement with reference data. Tree characteristic variables, especially canopy height itself, emerged as dominant drivers of height errors, while topography and built-up context also contributed. Consistent patterns observed across four additional cities indicated that these limitations are systemic rather than location-specific. We conclude that high-precision airborne LiDAR remains essential for urban forestry and recommend enhancing canopy height mapping techniques to better capture the structure of urban trees. A promising direction is the development of urban-specific CHMs with finer spatial and temporal resolution, improved temporal consistency, and integration with high-resolution imagery, contextual deep learning models, and local calibration strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73423,"journal":{"name":"International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 104791"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High-precision airborne LiDAR remains essential for urban forestry: Revealing the limitations of recent large-scale canopy height products in urban contexts\",\"authors\":\"Hesong Dong ,&nbsp;Zhibang Xu ,&nbsp;Jinzhou Wu ,&nbsp;Ting Lan ,&nbsp;Lin Wang ,&nbsp;Guofan Shao ,&nbsp;Lina Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jag.2025.104791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Urban trees play a crucial role in delivering ecosystem services, yet their structural complexity poses significant challenges for remote sensing. Although recent large-scale, open-access canopy height models (CHMs) offer potential alternatives to airborne LiDAR, their suitability for urban environments remains uncertain. This study systematically evaluated four prominent CHMs (Potapov, Lang, Tolan, and Malambo) using high-resolution airborne LiDAR data from Washington, D.C., with complementary analyses from four additional cities. We assessed their performance in both canopy classification and height prediction using classification and regression metrics, spatial autocorrelation, consistency tests, and explainable machine learning. Results revealed consistent limitations across products, including widespread misclassification of canopy, systematic tree height prediction biases — characterized by overestimation of low and underestimation of high canopies (the OLUH effect) — and pronounced spatial clustering of errors along urban–forest edges. Among the models, only the Lang CHM passed the Bland–Altman consistency test, showing marginal statistical agreement with reference data. Tree characteristic variables, especially canopy height itself, emerged as dominant drivers of height errors, while topography and built-up context also contributed. Consistent patterns observed across four additional cities indicated that these limitations are systemic rather than location-specific. We conclude that high-precision airborne LiDAR remains essential for urban forestry and recommend enhancing canopy height mapping techniques to better capture the structure of urban trees. A promising direction is the development of urban-specific CHMs with finer spatial and temporal resolution, improved temporal consistency, and integration with high-resolution imagery, contextual deep learning models, and local calibration strategies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal\",\"volume\":\"143 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104791\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569843225004388\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REMOTE SENSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569843225004388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

城市树木在提供生态系统服务方面发挥着至关重要的作用,但其结构的复杂性给遥感带来了重大挑战。尽管最近的大规模开放式冠层高度模型(CHMs)为机载激光雷达提供了潜在的替代方案,但它们对城市环境的适用性仍然不确定。本研究使用来自华盛顿特区的高分辨率机载激光雷达数据系统地评估了四个著名的chm (Potapov、Lang、Tolan和Malambo),并对另外四个城市进行了补充分析。我们使用分类和回归指标、空间自相关、一致性测试和可解释的机器学习来评估它们在冠层分类和高度预测方面的表现。结果显示,不同产品存在一致的局限性,包括冠层的普遍错误分类、系统性树高预测偏差(以高估低冠层和低估高冠层为特征(OLUH效应))以及沿城市森林边缘的明显空间聚类误差。在这些模型中,只有Lang CHM通过了Bland-Altman一致性检验,与参考数据具有边际统计一致性。树木的特征变量,尤其是冠层高度本身,是高度误差的主要驱动因素,而地形和建筑环境也有贡献。在另外四个城市观察到的一致模式表明,这些限制是系统性的,而不是具体地点的。我们得出结论,高精度机载激光雷达对城市林业仍然至关重要,并建议加强冠层高度测绘技术,以更好地捕捉城市树木的结构。一个有希望的方向是开发具有更精细的空间和时间分辨率,改进时间一致性,并与高分辨率图像,上下文深度学习模型和局部校准策略集成的城市特定chm。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
High-precision airborne LiDAR remains essential for urban forestry: Revealing the limitations of recent large-scale canopy height products in urban contexts
Urban trees play a crucial role in delivering ecosystem services, yet their structural complexity poses significant challenges for remote sensing. Although recent large-scale, open-access canopy height models (CHMs) offer potential alternatives to airborne LiDAR, their suitability for urban environments remains uncertain. This study systematically evaluated four prominent CHMs (Potapov, Lang, Tolan, and Malambo) using high-resolution airborne LiDAR data from Washington, D.C., with complementary analyses from four additional cities. We assessed their performance in both canopy classification and height prediction using classification and regression metrics, spatial autocorrelation, consistency tests, and explainable machine learning. Results revealed consistent limitations across products, including widespread misclassification of canopy, systematic tree height prediction biases — characterized by overestimation of low and underestimation of high canopies (the OLUH effect) — and pronounced spatial clustering of errors along urban–forest edges. Among the models, only the Lang CHM passed the Bland–Altman consistency test, showing marginal statistical agreement with reference data. Tree characteristic variables, especially canopy height itself, emerged as dominant drivers of height errors, while topography and built-up context also contributed. Consistent patterns observed across four additional cities indicated that these limitations are systemic rather than location-specific. We conclude that high-precision airborne LiDAR remains essential for urban forestry and recommend enhancing canopy height mapping techniques to better capture the structure of urban trees. A promising direction is the development of urban-specific CHMs with finer spatial and temporal resolution, improved temporal consistency, and integration with high-resolution imagery, contextual deep learning models, and local calibration strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal
International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation : ITC journal Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Earth-Surface Processes, Computers in Earth Sciences
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
77 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation publishes original papers that utilize earth observation data for natural resource and environmental inventory and management. These data primarily originate from remote sensing platforms, including satellites and aircraft, supplemented by surface and subsurface measurements. Addressing natural resources such as forests, agricultural land, soils, and water, as well as environmental concerns like biodiversity, land degradation, and hazards, the journal explores conceptual and data-driven approaches. It covers geoinformation themes like capturing, databasing, visualization, interpretation, data quality, and spatial uncertainty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信