过渡性住房服务无庇护退伍军人低需求模式的评价。

IF 3.2
Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-14 DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.20240510
Jack Tsai, Youngran Kim, Dorota Szymkowiak, Gabrielle Haley, Rebecca Kinney
{"title":"过渡性住房服务无庇护退伍军人低需求模式的评价。","authors":"Jack Tsai, Youngran Kim, Dorota Szymkowiak, Gabrielle Haley, Rebecca Kinney","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20240510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) contracts with community-based agencies to operate its Grant and Per Diem (GPD) transitional housing programs, including a low-barrier model called low demand. This study aimed to compare characteristics and outcomes of unsheltered veterans served by the GPD Low Demand program with those of unsheltered veterans served by two other GPD programs (Clinical Treatment and Service Intensive).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>National VA administrative data on 16,059 unique unsheltered veterans who participated in GPD programs in fiscal years 2019-2023 were analyzed. Outcomes examined included rates of positive program exit, returns to homelessness within 12 months, and use of VA health care services before and after program admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Low Demand program served a higher proportion of unsheltered veterans than the two comparison programs (36.8% vs. 24.0%-26.8%, respectively). Nearly half (46.4%) of unsheltered veterans in the Low Demand program had positive program exits, but they were significantly less likely to have positive program exits and exits to permanent housing, had a shorter length of stay, and were less likely to have reduced acute care use than unsheltered veterans in the two comparison programs. Veterans who were older, were non-Hispanic Black, and had a moderate VA service-connected disability rating were more likely to have a positive exit from the Low Demand program.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings reflect challenges experienced in low-barrier programs serving unsheltered individuals, who often have high treatment needs. Unsheltered individuals with certain profiles may benefit more than others from low-barrier programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":520759,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)","volume":" ","pages":"801-808"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Low-Demand Model for Serving Unsheltered Homeless Veterans in Transitional Housing.\",\"authors\":\"Jack Tsai, Youngran Kim, Dorota Szymkowiak, Gabrielle Haley, Rebecca Kinney\",\"doi\":\"10.1176/appi.ps.20240510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) contracts with community-based agencies to operate its Grant and Per Diem (GPD) transitional housing programs, including a low-barrier model called low demand. This study aimed to compare characteristics and outcomes of unsheltered veterans served by the GPD Low Demand program with those of unsheltered veterans served by two other GPD programs (Clinical Treatment and Service Intensive).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>National VA administrative data on 16,059 unique unsheltered veterans who participated in GPD programs in fiscal years 2019-2023 were analyzed. Outcomes examined included rates of positive program exit, returns to homelessness within 12 months, and use of VA health care services before and after program admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Low Demand program served a higher proportion of unsheltered veterans than the two comparison programs (36.8% vs. 24.0%-26.8%, respectively). Nearly half (46.4%) of unsheltered veterans in the Low Demand program had positive program exits, but they were significantly less likely to have positive program exits and exits to permanent housing, had a shorter length of stay, and were less likely to have reduced acute care use than unsheltered veterans in the two comparison programs. Veterans who were older, were non-Hispanic Black, and had a moderate VA service-connected disability rating were more likely to have a positive exit from the Low Demand program.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings reflect challenges experienced in low-barrier programs serving unsheltered individuals, who often have high treatment needs. Unsheltered individuals with certain profiles may benefit more than others from low-barrier programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"801-808\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20240510\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20240510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:美国退伍军人事务部(VA)与社区机构签订合同,运营其赠款和每日津贴(GPD)过渡性住房项目,包括一种称为低需求的低门槛模式。本研究旨在比较GPD低需求项目服务的未庇护退伍军人与其他两个GPD项目(临床治疗和服务强化)服务的未庇护退伍军人的特征和结果。方法:分析2019-2023财政年度参加GPD计划的16,059名独特的无庇护退伍军人的国家VA管理数据。检查的结果包括项目积极退出率,12个月内重返无家可归者,以及项目进入前后VA医疗保健服务的使用情况。结果:低需求方案服务的无庇护退伍军人比例高于两个比较方案(分别为36.8%和24.0%-26.8%)。在低需求计划中,近一半(46.4%)的无庇护退伍军人有积极的计划退出,但与两个比较计划中的无庇护退伍军人相比,他们有积极的计划退出和永久住房退出的可能性要小得多,停留时间更短,急症护理使用减少的可能性要小得多。年龄较大的非西班牙裔黑人退伍军人,以及与退伍军人事务部服务相关的中等残疾评级,更有可能积极退出低需求计划。结论:这些发现反映了在低障碍项目中遇到的挑战,这些项目为那些通常有很高治疗需求的无庇护者提供服务。具有某些特征的未受庇护的个人可能比其他人从低门槛项目中受益更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the Low-Demand Model for Serving Unsheltered Homeless Veterans in Transitional Housing.

Objective: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) contracts with community-based agencies to operate its Grant and Per Diem (GPD) transitional housing programs, including a low-barrier model called low demand. This study aimed to compare characteristics and outcomes of unsheltered veterans served by the GPD Low Demand program with those of unsheltered veterans served by two other GPD programs (Clinical Treatment and Service Intensive).

Methods: National VA administrative data on 16,059 unique unsheltered veterans who participated in GPD programs in fiscal years 2019-2023 were analyzed. Outcomes examined included rates of positive program exit, returns to homelessness within 12 months, and use of VA health care services before and after program admission.

Results: The Low Demand program served a higher proportion of unsheltered veterans than the two comparison programs (36.8% vs. 24.0%-26.8%, respectively). Nearly half (46.4%) of unsheltered veterans in the Low Demand program had positive program exits, but they were significantly less likely to have positive program exits and exits to permanent housing, had a shorter length of stay, and were less likely to have reduced acute care use than unsheltered veterans in the two comparison programs. Veterans who were older, were non-Hispanic Black, and had a moderate VA service-connected disability rating were more likely to have a positive exit from the Low Demand program.

Conclusions: These findings reflect challenges experienced in low-barrier programs serving unsheltered individuals, who often have high treatment needs. Unsheltered individuals with certain profiles may benefit more than others from low-barrier programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信